Effects of news frames on perceived risk, emotions, and learning

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Otieno, Christine ^a   Spada, Hans ^a   Renkl, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; INVASIVE SPECIES; LEARNING; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRETEST POSTTEST DESIGN; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LEARNING; MALE; MASS MEDIA; RISK; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891897693     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079696     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. De Vreese CH (2005) News framing: Theory and typology. Information. Des J 13: 51-62. doi:10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre.
2. López WL, Sabucedo JM (2007) Culture of peace and mass media. Eur Psychol 12: 147-155. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.12.2.147.
3. Price V, Tewksbury D, Powers E (1997) Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Commun Res 24: 481-506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002.
4. Valkenburg PM, Semetko HA, de Vreese CH (1999) The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Commun Res 26: 550-569. doi:10.1177/ 009365099026005002.
5. Iyengar S (1991) Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Gross K (2008) Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Pol Psychol 29: 169-192. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x.
7. Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP (2002) Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ Psychol 37: 91-105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702-4.
8. Um ER, Plass JL, Hayward EO, Homer BD (2012) Emotional design in multimedia learning. J Educ Psychol 104: 485-498. doi:10.1037/a0026609.
9. Pan Z, Kosicki G (1993) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Pol Commun 10: 55-75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963.
10. Shen F (2004) Effects of news frames and schemas on individuals' issue interpretations and attitudes. Journalism Mass Commun Q 81: 400-416. doi:10.1177/107769900408100211.
11. Lecheler SK, de Vreese CH, Slothuus R (2009) Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Commun Res 36: 400-425. doi:10.1177/ 0093650209333028.
12. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Schumann D (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J Consum Res 10: 135. doi:10.1086/208954.
13. Von Sikorski C, Schierl T (2012) Effects of news frames on recipients' information processing in disability sports communications. J Media Psych Theor Methods And Applications 24: 113-123. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000069.
14. Chong D, Druckman JN (2007) Framing theory. Annu Rev Pol Sci 10: 103-126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
15. Igartua J-J, Moral-Toranzo F, Fernández I (2011) Cognitive, attitudinal, and emotional effects of news frame and group cues, on processing news about immigration. J Media Psych Theor Methods And Applications 23: 174-185. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000050.
16. Van Gorp B, Vettehen PH, Beentjes JWJ (2009) Challenging the frame in the news. Media Psychol 21: 161-170. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.21.4.161.
17. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1984) Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 39: 341-350. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341.
18. Scheufele DA, Iyengar S (2012) The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In: K KenskiKH Jamieson. The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Entman RM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun 43: 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
20. Tankard JW (2001) The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In: OH GandyAE GrantSD Reese. Framing public life perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 95-106.
21. Lang A, Bradley SD, Chung Y, Lee S (2003) Where the mind meets the message: Reflections on ten years of measuring psychological responses to media. J Broadcasting Electron Media 47: 650-655. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4704-11.
22. Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Kintsch W, van Dijk TA (1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychol Rev 85: 363-394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363.
24. Scheufele B (2004) Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications 29: 401-428. doi:10.1515/comm.2004.29.4. 401.
25. Kintsch W, Welsch DM (1991) The construction-integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. In: WE HockleyS Lewandowsky. Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B Murdock. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 367-385.
26. Kinder DR (2007) Curmudgeonly advice. J Commun 57: 155-162. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00335.x.
27. Shah DV, Kwak N, Schmierbach M, Zubric J (2004) The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Hum Commun Res 30: 102-120. doi:10.1093/hcr/30. 1.102.
28. Berinsky AJ, Kinder DR (2006) Making sense of issues through media frames: Understanding the Kosovo crisis. J Polit 68. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508. 2006.00451.x.
29. Kintsch W (1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Scheufele DA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. J Commun 49: 103. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x.
31. Scheufele DA (2000) Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Commun Soc 3: 297. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0323-07.
32. Garner R, Gillingham MG, White CS (1989) Effects of "seductive details" on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cogn Instruction 6: 41-57. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0601-2.
33. Otieno C, Renkl A, Liebler K, Deil U, Ludemann T, Spada H (2013) Informing about climate change and invasive species: How the presentation of information affects perception of risk, emotions, and learning. Environ Educ Res (In press). doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.833589.
34. De Vreese CH (2012) New avenues for framing research. Am Behav Sci 56: 365-375. doi:10.1177/0002764211426331.
35. Semetko H, Valkenburg P (2000) Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. J Commun 50: 93-109. doi:10.1111/j.1460- 2466.2000.tb02843.x.
36. Neuman WR, Just MR, Crigler AN (1992) Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Gross K, D'Ambrosio L (2004) Framing emotional response. Pol Psychol 25: 1-29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00354.x.
38. Yegiyan NS, Lang A (2010) Processing central and peripheral detail: How content arousal and emotional tone influence encoding. Media Psychol 13: 77-99. doi:10.1080/15213260903563014.
39. Frijda NH (2009) Emotion experience and its varieties. Emotion. ReView 1: 264-271. doi:10.1177/1754073909103595.
40. Lazarus RS (1991) Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41. Ortony A, Clore GL, Collins A (1988) The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Ellsworth PC, Scherer KR (2003) Appraisal processes in emotion. In: RJ DavidsonKR SchererHH Goldsmith. Handbook of affective sciences. Series in affective science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 572-595.
43. Yates JF, Stone ER (1992) The risk construct. In: JF Yates. Risk-taking behavior. Wiley series in human performance and cognition. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 1-25.
44. Renn O, Burns WJ, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (1992) The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications. J Soc Issues 48: 137-160. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01949.x.
45. Böhm G, Brun W (2008) Introduction to the special issue: Intuition and affect in risk perception and decision making. Judgment Decision Mak 3: 1-4.
46. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24: 311-322. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x. PubMed: 15078302.
47. Böhm G (2003) Emotional reactions to environmental risks: Consequentialist versus ethical evaluation. J Environ Psychol 23: 199-212. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00114-7.
48. Bolte A, Goschke T, Kuhl J (2003) Emotion and intuition: Effects of positive and negative mood on implicit judgments of semantic coherence. Psychol Sci 14: 416-421. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01456. PubMed: 12930470.
49. Forgas JP (1995) Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychol Bull 117: 39-66. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39. PubMed: 7870863.
50. Nelson TE, Oxley ZM, Clawson RA (1997) Toward a psychology of framing effects. Pol Behav 19: 221-246. doi:10.1023/A:1024834831093.
51. Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ, Lugo AE, Ewel JJ et al. (2011) Don't judge species on their origins. Nature 474: 153-154. doi:10.1038/474153a. PubMed: 21654782.
52. Hulme PE, Pysek P, Nentwig W, Vilà M (2009) Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science 324: 40-41. doi:10.1126/science.1171111. PubMed: 19342572.
53. Wegner-Kiss G, Breuer M (2008) Der Neuling breitet sich aus. Der Badische Winzer: 26.
54. McDaniels T, Axelrod LJ, Slovic P (1995) Characterizing perception of ecological risk. Risk Anal 15: 575-588. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00754.x. PubMed: 7501876.
55. Lazo JK, Kinnell JC, Fisher A (2000) Expert and layperson perceptions of ecosystem risk. Risk Anal 20: 179-194. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202019. PubMed: 10859779.
56. Nerb J, Spada H (2001) Evaluation of environmental problems: A coherence model of cognition and emotion. Cogn Emotion 15: 521-551. doi:10.1080/ 02699930143000013.
57. Perkins DN, Simmons R (1988) Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming. Rev Educ Res 58: 303-326. doi:10.3102/00346543058003303.
58. Chi MTH (1997) Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. J Learn Sci 6: 271-315. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603-1.
59. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC, Fleiss J (2003) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
60. MacKinnon DP (2008) Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40: 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879. PubMed: 18697684.
62. Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis a regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
63. Hayes AF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun Monogr 76: 408-420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360.
64. DiCiccio TJ, Efron B (1996) Bootstrap confidence intervals. Stat Sci 11: 189-228. doi:10.1214/ss/1032280214.
65. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Claes de Vreese HB (2003) Valenced news frames and public support for the EU. Communications 28: 361-381. doi:10.1515/comm.2003.024.
67. De Vreese CH, Boomgaarden HG, Semetko HA (2011) (In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union. Commun Res 38: 179-205. doi:10.1177/ 0093650210384934.
68. Pekrun R (2006) The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educ Psychol Rev 18: 315-341. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
69. Livingstone DW (2006) Informal learning: Conceptual distinctions and preliminary findings. In: Z BekermanNC BurbulesD Silberman-Keller. Learning in places: The informal education reader. Counterpoints: Studies in the postmodern theory of education; Vol 249. pp. 1058-1634 (Print); New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Vol. 249. pp. 203-227
70. Tewksbury D, Jones J, Peske MW, Raymond A, Vig W (2000) The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism Mass Commun Q 77: 804-829. doi:10.1177/ 107769900007700406.
71. Matthes J (2007) Beyond accessibility? Toward an on-line and memory-based model of framing effects. Communications 32: 51-78. doi:10.1515/COMMUN.2007. 003.
72. De Vreese CH (2004) The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment. Mass Commun Soc 7: 191-214. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0702-4.
73. Lecheler SK, de Vreese CH (2011) Getting real: The duration of framing effects. J Commun 61: 959-983. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01580.x.
74. Lecheler SK, Matthes J (2012) Framing effects over time: Comparing affective and cognitive news frames. AZ, USA: Phoenix and Publishing House. Available: http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p-mla-apa-research-citation/5/5/ 4/4/0/p554401-index.html. Accessed 25 February 2013.