(In)direct framing effects: The effects of news media framing on public support for Turkish membership in the European Union

Communication Research

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 179-205

  de Vreese, Claes H ^a   Boomgaarden, Hajo G ^a   Semetko, Holli A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

EU; framing; media; news; public opinion; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952303910     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650210384934     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bilgin, P. (2004). A Return to Civilsational Geopolitics in the Mediterranean? Changing Geopolitical Images of the European Union in the Post-Cold War Era. Geopolitics, 9, 269-291.
2. Boomgaarden, H.G., Vliegenthart, R., Schuck, A.R.T., de Vreese, C.H. (2010). News on the move: Exogenous events and news coverage of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 506-526.
3. Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L., & Bernston, G.G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3-25.
4. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., & Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley.
5. Cappella, J.N., & Jamieson, K.H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Carey, S., & Burton, J. (2004). The influence of the press in shaping public opinion towards the European Union in Britain. Political Studies, 52, 623-640.
7. Chong, D., & Druckman, J.N. (2007). Atheory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118.
8. Cobb, M.D., & Kuklinski, J.H. (1997). Changing minds: Political arguments and political persuasion. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 88-121.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regession/correlation analysis for the behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. de Vreese, C.H. (2002). Framing Europe. Television news and European integration. Amsterdam: Aksant/ Transaction.
12. de Vreese, C.H. (2010). The effects of journalistic news frames. In P. D'Angelo & J. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing Framing Analysis (pp. 187-214). Routledge.
13. de Vreese, C.H., & Boomgaarden, H.G. (2005). Projecting EU Referendums: Fear of immigration and support for European integration. European Union Politics, 6(1), 59.
14. de Vreese, C.H., & Boomgaarden, H.G. (2006). Media effects on public opinion about the enlargement of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 419-436.
15. de Vreese, C.H., Boomgaarden, H.G., & Semetko, H.A. (2008). Hard and soft: Public support for Turkish membership in the EU. European Union Politics, 9, 511-530.
16. de Vreese, C.H., Peter, J., & Semetko, H.A. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the euro: Across-national comparative study of frames in the news, Political Communication, 18(2), 107-122.
17. de Vreese, C.H., & Semetko, H.A. (2004). Political campaigning in referendums: Framing the referendum issue. London: Routledge.
18. Druckman, J.N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225-256.
19. Druckman, J.N., & Nelson, K.R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversation limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 729-745.
20. Entman, R. (1991). Framing US coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air accidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27.
21. Gabel, M. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics, 60, 333-354.
22. Gamson, W.A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Guild, E. (2003). International terrorism and EU immigration, asylum and borders policy: The unexpected victims of 11 September 2001. European Foreign Affairs, 8, 331-346.
24. Haider-Markel, D., P., & Joslyn, M.R. (2001). Gun policy, opinion, tragedy, and blame attribution: The conditional influence of issue frames. Journal of Politics, 63, 520-543.
25. Holbrook, A.L., Krosnick, J.A., Visser, P.S., Gardner, W.L., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2001). Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 930-950.
26. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, community and cues public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 6, 419-443.
27. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Johnson-Cartee, K.S., & Copland, G.A. (1991). Negative political advertising: Coming of age. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.
31. Karp, J.A., & Bowler, S. (2006). Broadening and deepening or broadening versus deepening: The question of enlargement and Europe's hesitant Europeans. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 369-390.
32. Kepplinger, H.M., & Weissbecker, H. (1991). Negativität als Nachrichtenideologie [Negativity as news ideology]. Publizistik, 36, 330-342.
33. Kinder, D.R., & Sanders, L.M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social cognition, 8(1), 73-103.
34. Koenig, T., Mihelj, S., Downey, J., & Bek, M.G. (2006). Media framing of the issue of Turkish accession to the EU. AEuropean or national process? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 19, 149-169.
35. Lau, R.R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 119-138.
36. Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C.H. (in press). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication.
37. Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2003) National Identity and Support for European Integration. Discussion paper SP IV 2003-202. Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fuer Sozialforschung (WZB).
38. McLaren, L. (2007). Explaining opposition to Turkish membership of the EU. European Union Politics, 8, 251-278.
39. Nabi, R., & Oliver, M.B. (2009). The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
40. Nelson, T.E., Clawson, R.A., & Oxley, Z.M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberty conflict and its effects on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583.
41. Nelson, T.E., & Willey, E.A. (2001). Issue frames that strike a value balance: Apolitical psychology perspective. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 245-270). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Norris, P. (2000). Avirtuous circle. Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Page, B.I., & Shapiro, R.Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Patterson, T.E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Vintage.
45. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion. Atheoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication science (pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Abiex.
46. Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), p. 103-122.
47. Scheufele, D. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297-316.
48. Schneider, T.R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A.M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo, J.,et al.(2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20, 256-266.
49. Schuck, A.R.T., & de Vreese, C.H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 5-32.
50. Schuck, A.R.T., & de Vreese, C.H. (2009). Reversed mobilization in referendum campaigns: How positive news framing can mobilize the skeptics. International Journal of Press/ Politics, 1, 40-66.
51. Semetko, H.A., & Valkenburg, P.M. (2000). Framing European politics: Acontent analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93-109.
52. Shah, D., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 102-120.
53. Slater, M.D. (2004). Operationalizing and analyzing exposure: The foundation of media effects research. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 168-183.
54. Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: Adual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29, 1-28.
55. Slothuus, R., & de Vreese, C.H. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning and framing effects. Journal of Politics, 72, 630-645.
56. Sniderman, P., & Theriault, S.M. (2004). The structure of political arguments and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion-Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 133-166). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57. Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp.290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58. Soroka, S.N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68, 372-385.
59. Terkildsen, N., & Schnell, F. (1997). How media frames move public opinion. An analysis of the women's movement. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 879-900.
60. Valentino, N.A., Beckmann, M.N., & Buhr, T.A. (2001). Aspiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18, 347-367.
61. Van der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62. Wessler, B., Peters, B., Sifft, A., Bruggeman, M., & van Konigslow, K. (2008). Transnationalization of public spheres. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
63. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.