Bridging the students' and instructor's experiences: Exploring instructional potential of videoconference in multi-campus universities

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 64-72

  Szeto, Elson ^a  

^a THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891639768     PISSN: 13036521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akyol, Z., Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C. (2009). A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 123-136.
2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.
3. Andrews, T, and Klease. G. (1998). Challenges of multisite video conferencing: The development of an alternative teaching/learning model. Australian Journal of Education Technology, 14(2), 88-97.
4. Chen, N.-S., Ko, H.-C., Kinshuk, & Lin, T. (2005). A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 181-194.
5. Ebden, M. (2010). We're on a steep learning curve: The benefits and challenges of multi-campus university course delivery. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy and A. Lichtenberg (Eds.), Research and Development in Higher Education: Reshaping Higher Education, Melbourne: HERDSA.
6. Freeman, M. (1998). Videoconferencing: A solution to the multi-campus large classes problem?" British Journal of Educational Technology, 29 (3), 197-210.
7. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
8. Hammond, M. (2009). What is an affordance and can it help us understand the use of ICT in education? Education and Information Technology, Access: http://www.springerlink.com/content/bur02423905713k1/.
9. Hastie, M., Hung, I.-C., Chen, N.-S., & Kinshuk. (2010). A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 9-24.
10. Jacobs, G. and Rodgers, C. (1997). Remote teaching with digital video: A trans-national experience. " British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 292-304.
11. Johnson, B. and Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research-quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oak: Sage Publications.
12. Karal, H. (2010). New perspective to educational technology: Interdisciplinary cooperation "an example of faculties of education and engineering". Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 132-142.
13. Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55, p.808-820.
14. Kirkgöz, Y. (2011). A blended learning study on implementing video recorded speaking tasks in task-based classroom instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 1-13.
15. Knipe, D. and Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301-311.
16. Lawson, T., Comber, C, Gage, J., and Cullum-Hanshaw, A. (2010). Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 58(6), 729-753.
17. Li, Q., Moorman, L, and Dyjur, P. (2010). Inquiry-based learning and e-mentoring via videoconference: A study of mathematics and science learning of Canadian rural students. Education Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 729-753.
18. Marton, F. and Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcomes and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11.
19. Pearson, Murray, and Chris Jesshope. 1998. Multi-campus teaching using computer networks. In Third Australasian Conference on Computer Science Education. Australia
20. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
21. Rourke, L. and Kanuka, H. (2009). Learning in communities of inquiry: A review of literature. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 19-48.
22. Salehi, K. and Golafshani, N. (2010). Using mixed methods in research studies: An opportunity with its challenges. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4, 186-191.
23. Schrire, S. (2004). Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science, 32(6), 475-502.
24. Scott, G., Grebennikov, L. and Johnston, K. 2007. Study of Australian Multi-Campus Universities. Journal of Institutional Research, 13(1), 1-23.
25. Smyth, R. 2005. Broadband videoconferencing as a tool for learner-centred distance learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 805-820.
26. Smyth, R. 2011. Enhancing learner-learner interaction using video communications in higher education: Implications from theorising about a new model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 113-127.
27. Stephenson, J., Brown, C. and Griffin, D. (2008). Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles. Computers and Education, 50(3), 640-651.
28. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Szeto, E. (In Press, 2014). A comparison of online/face-to-face students' and instructor's experiences: Examining blended synchronous learning effects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences.
30. Szeto, E. (2013). Extending the community of inquiry framework as an instructional approach: A study of educational experiences in blended synchronous learning, The Internet and Higher Education, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.11.002.
31. Szeto, E. (2011). Transforming learning and teaching in higher education: The impact of ICT on pedagogy, peer interaction and support in a networked virtual learning environment. The International Journal of Learning, 17(11), 205-214.
32. The University Grants Committee of HKSAR. (2010). General Statistics on UGC-funded Institutions. Hong Kong: UGC-HKSAR.
33. Whipp, J. and Lorentz, R. (2009). Cognitive and social help giving in online teaching: An exploratory study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(2), 169-192.
34. Woo, K., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Preston, G., Green, D. and Phillips, R. (2008). Web-based lecture technologies: blurring the boundaries between face-to-face and distance learning. ALT-J, 16(2), 81-93.
35. Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centred communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers & Education, 52(4), 820-833.