A blended learning study on implementing video recorded speaking tasks in task-based classroom instruction

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1-13

  Kirkgöz, Yasemin ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Mixed research method; Speaking skills; Student teachers of english; Task based speaking course (TBSC); Video camera

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053965398     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 241-249.
2. Beauvois, M. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in a computer-assisted classroom Discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28(1), 177-190.
3. Beauvois, M. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 198-217.
4. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.
5. Brindley, G. (2009). Task-centred language assessment in language learning: The promise and the challenge. Assessment in TBLL. In K. Van den Branden, K. M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 435-454). John Benjamins.
6. Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods. NSW: Pearson Education.
7. Chandra, S. (2007). Lecture video capture for the masses. In Proceedings of ITiCSE'07, June 23-27 (pp. 276-280). Dundee, Scotland, UK: ACM.
8. Christel, M. G., & Frisch, M. H. (2008). Evaluating the contributions of video representation for a life oral history collection. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Pittsburgh PA, (pp. 241-250). ACM.
9. Collentine, J. (2000). Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge provided by user behavior tracking technologies. Language Learning and Technology, 3, 44-57.
10. Dewar, T., & Whittington, D. (2004). Blended learning research report. Calliope Learning, 2(1), 1-12.
11. Felix, U. (2003). Language learning online: Deconstructing the myths. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 118-138.
12. Foster, P. (1999). Key concepts in ELT: Task based learning and pedagogy. ELT Journal, 53(1), 69-70.
13. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. SSLA, 18, 299-323.
14. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15. Kiernan, P. (2005). Storytelling with low-level learners. Developing narrative tasks. In B. L. Leaver, & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 58-68). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
16. Levy, M. (2000) Scope, goals and methods in CALL research: Questions of coherence and autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(2), 170-195.
17. Lonergan, J. (1984). Video in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Long, M. H. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interactions. University of Hawaii's Working Papers in ESL, 8(2), 1-26.
19. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27-55.
20. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp.15-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Loumpourdi, L. (2005). Developing from PPP to TBL: A focused grammar task. In B. L. Leaver, & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp.33-39). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. MacDonald, J. (2006). Blended learning and online tutoring: A good practice guide. Aldershot, England: Gower Publishing.
23. Motteram, G. (1999). Changing the research paradigm: Qualitative research methodology and the CALL classroom. In Worldcall: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp.201-213). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.
24. Muller, T. (2005). Adding tasks to textbooks for beginner learners. In B. L. Leaver, & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp. 69-77). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning: Parameters for designing a blended language environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17, 163-178.
26. Nunan, D. (1993). Task-based syllabus design: Selecting, grading and sequencing task. In G. Crookes, & S. M.Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp.55-68). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
27. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Odhabi, H., & Nicks-McCaleb, L. (2009). Video recording lectures: Student and professor perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology. no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01011.x
29. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 39-56.
31. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51-54.
32. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.
33. Skehan, P. (2003). Tasks in L2 learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1-14.
34. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Stark, P. P. (2005). Integrating task-based learning into a business English programme. In B. L. Leaver, & J. Willis (Eds.), Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching (pp.40-49). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
36. Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19, 57-78.
37. Tomalin, B., & Stempleski, S. (1990). Video in action. London: Prentice Hall.
38. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
39. Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2005). Research methods in education. London: Pearson Publishers.
40. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.
41. Willis, J. (2009). The TBL framework: The task cycle. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp.227-242). John Benjamins.
42. Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2001). Task-based language learning. In R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.