The association between scholarly impact and national institutes of health funding in ophthalmology

Ophthalmology

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 423-428

  Svider, Peter F ^a,b   Lopez, Santiago A ^b   Husain, Qasim ^b   Bhagat, Neelakshi ^a   Eloy, Jean Anderson ^b,c,d   Langer, Paul D ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF OPHTHALMOLOGY AND VISUAL SCIENCE   (United States)

^b RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c RWJ Barnabas Health   (United States)

^d NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FUNDING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNIVERSITY;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); OPHTHALMOLOGY; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84891635293     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: 15494713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. E.A. Akl, J.J. Meerpohl, and D. Raad et al. Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review [report online] CMAJ 184 2012 E602 E612
2. B. Ashar, R. Levine, and J. Magaziner et al. An association between paying physician-teachers for their teaching efforts and an improved educational experience for learners J Gen Intern Med 22 2007 1393 1397
3. J.A. Eloy, P.F. Svider, and K.M. Mauro et al. Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic otolaryngology Laryngoscope 122 2012 2690 2694
4. J.A. Eloy, P. Svider, and S.S. Chandrasekhar et al. Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within academic otolaryngology departments Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148 2013 215 222
5. A.A. Atasoylu, S.M. Wright, and B.W. Beasley et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators J Gen Intern Med 18 2003 711 716
6. T.A. Kotchen, T. Lindquist, K. Malik, and E. Ehrenfeld NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research JAMA 291 2004 836 843
7. I. Rezek, R.J. McDonald, and D.F. Kallmes Is the h-index predictive of greater NIH funding success among academic radiologists? Acad Radiol 18 2011 1337 1340
8. M. Colaco, P.F. Svider, and K.M. Mauro et al. Is there a relationship between National Institutes of Health funding and research impact on academic urology? J Urol 190 2013 999 1003
9. P.F. Svider, K.M. Mauro, and S. Sanghvi et al. Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists? Laryngoscope 123 2013 118 122
10. Zerhouni EA. Reviewing peer review: NIH needs your help. Available at: http://www.nih.gov/about/director/newsletter/Summer2007.htm. Accessed July 31, 2013.
11. J.E. Hirsch An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 2005 16569 16572
12. J.A. Eloy, P.F. Svider, and D. Patel et al. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in otolaryngology Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 148 2013 764 769
13. P.F. Svider, Z.A. Choudhry, and O.J. Choudhry et al. The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology Laryngoscope 123 2013 103 106
14. J.A. Eloy, P.F. Svider, and D.V. Cherla et al. Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians Laryngoscope 123 2013 1865 1875
15. B.M. Benway, P. Kalidas, J.M. Cabello, and S.B. Bhayani Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology 74 2009 30 33
16. P.S. Pagel, and J.A. Hudetz An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics Anaesthesia 66 2011 873 878
17. P.S. Pagel, and J.A. Hudetz H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55 2011 1085 1089
18. P.S. Pagel, and J.A. Hudetz Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members Br J Anaesth 107 2011 357 361
19. J. Lee, K.L. Kraus, and W.T. Couldwell Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article J Neurosurg 111 2009 387 392
20. Svider PF, Husain Q, Folbe AJ, et al. Assessing National Institutes of Health funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg 2013 Nov 12 [Epub ahead of print]
21. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, et al. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg 2013 Sept 27 [Epub ahead of print]
22. A.A. Pashkova, P.F. Svider, and C.Y. Chang et al. Gender disparity among United States anesthesiologists: are women underrepresented in academic ranks and scholarly productivity? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 57 2013 1058 1064
23. A.E. Rad, W. Brinjikji, H.J. Cloft, and D.F. Kallmes The h-index in academic radiology Acad Radiol 17 2010 817 821
24. P.F. Svider, A.A. Pashkova, and Z. Choudhry et al. Comparison of scholarly impact among surgical specialties: an examination of 2429 academic surgeons Laryngoscope 123 2013 884 889
25. S.E. Waisbren, H. Bowles, and T. Hasan et al. Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty J Womens Health (Larchmt) 17 2008 207 214
26. J.A. Eloy, P.F. Svider, and O. Kovalerchik et al. Gender differences in successful NIH grant funding in otolaryngology Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149 2013 77 83
27. B. Sharma, S. Boet, and T. Grantcharov et al. The h-index outperforms other bibliometrics in the assessment of research performance in general surgery: a province-wide study Surgery 153 2013 493 501
28. Svider PF, Mady LJ, Husain Q, et al. Geographic differences in academic promotion practices, fellowship training, and scholarly impact. Am J Otolarygol 2013;34:464-70.
29. Svider PF, Blake DM, Setzen M, et al. Rhinology fellowship training and its scholarly impact. Am J Rhinol Allergy. In press.
30. O. von Bohlen Und Halbach How to judge a book by its cover? How useful are bibliometric indices for the evaluation of "scientific quality" or "scientific productivity"? Ann Anat 193 2011 191 196
31. N.A. Healy, R.W. Glynn, and C. Scutaru et al. The h index and the identification of global benchmarks for breast cancer research output Breast Cancer Res Treat 127 2011 845 851
32. P. Ball Index aims for fair ranking of scientists Nature 436 2005 900
33. J. Bligh, and J. Brice Further insights into the roles of the medical educator: the importance of scholarly management Acad Med 84 2009 1161 1165
34. C. Baldwin, L. Chandran, and M. Gusic Guidelines for evaluating the educational performance of medical school faculty: priming a national conversation Teach Learn Med 23 2011 285 297
35. B. Alberts Impact factor distortions Science 340 2013 787
36. A. Purvis The h index: playing the numbers game [letter] Trends Ecol Evol 21 2006 422
37. L. Engqvist, and J.G. Frommen The h-index and self-citations [letter] Trends Ecol Evol 23 2008 250 252