Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic otolaryngology

Laryngoscope

Volumn 122, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2690-2694

  Eloy, Jean Anderson ^a,b   Svider, Peter F ^a   Mauro, Kevin M ^a   Setzen, Michael ^c,d   Baredes, Soly ^a  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b RWJ Barnabas Health   (United States)

^c NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

academic physician scientific productivity; academic productivity; academic promotion; academic rank determination; academic rank in surgical specialties; faculty productivity; h index; otolaryngology fellowships; surgical faculty productivity

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; H INDEX; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; SPECIALIZATION; SURGEON;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EFFICIENCY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; JOB SATISFACTION; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84871329959     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23749     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Golub JS, Ossoff RH, Johns MM, III,. Fellowship and career path preferences in residents of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 882-887.
2. Sataloff RT,. Fellowship training in otolaryngology. Ear Nose Throat J 2009; 88: 1084-1086.
3. Raynor EM,. General otolaryngology and the subspecialties: finding the balance. Ear Nose Throat J 2008; 87: 666-667.
4. Raynor EM,. Practice patterns in academic otolaryngology 2006: a tool for the future. Ear Nose Throat J 2008; 87: 681-683.
5. Rosenberg TL,. Section for residents and fellows 2011 update to SUO. 2011 SUO Annual Meeting. Available at: www.suo-aado.org/uploads/SRF-OTO-residency- survey-2011.pptx Accessed July 5, 2012.
6. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA,. An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 873-878.
7. von Bohlen Und Halbach O,. How to judge a book by its cover? How useful are bibliometric indices for the evaluation of "scientific quality" or "scientific productivity"? Ann Anat 2011; 193: 191-196.
8. Hirsch JE,. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 16569-16572.
9. Hirsch JE,. Does the H index have predictive power? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 19193-19198.
10. Akl EA, Meerpohl JJ, Raad D, et al. Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review. CMAJ 2012; 184: E602-E612.
11. Schweitzer L, Sessler DI, Martin NC,. The challenge for excellence at the University of Louisville: implementation and outcomes of research resource investments between 1996 and 2006. Acad Med 2008; 83: 560-567.
12. Jacob BA, Lefgren L,. The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. J Public Econ 2011; 95: 1168-1177.
13. Rezek I, McDonald RJ, Kallmes DF,. Is the h-index predictive of greater NIH funding success among academic radiologists? Acad Radiol 2011; 18: 1337-1340.
14. Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT,. Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 2009; 111: 387-392.
15. Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB,. Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology? Urology 2009; 74: 30-33.
16. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA,. H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 1085-1089.
17. Rad AE, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF,. The H-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 817-821.
18. Svider PF, Choudhry ZA, Choudhry OJ, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA,. The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 2012 Jul 25; DOI: 10.1002/lary.23569. Epub ahead of print.
19. Svider PF, Mauro KM, Sanghvi S, Setzen M, Baredes S, Eloy JA,. Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists? Laryngoscope 2012 Sep 18; DOI: 10.1002/lary.23659. Epub ahead of print.
20. Purvis A,. The h index: playing the numbers game. Trends Ecol Evol 2006; 21: 422.
21. Engqvist L, Frommen JG,. The h-index and self-citations. Trends Ecol Evol 2008; 23: 250-252.
22. Baldwin C, Chandran L, Gusic M,. Guidelines for evaluating the educational performance of medical school faculty: priming a national conversation. Teach Learn Med 2011; 23: 285-297.
23. Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 711-716.
24. Beasley BW, Wright SM, Cofrancesco J Jr, Babbott SF, Thomas PA, Bass EB,. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada. A survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA 1997; 278: 723-728.
25. Lamki N, Marchand M,. The medical educator teaching portfolio: its compilation and potential utility. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2006; 6: 7-12.