NIH Peer Review of Grant Applications for Clinical Research

JAMA

Volumn 291, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 836-843

  Kotchen, Theodore A ^a,b   Lindquist, Teresa ^a   Malik, Karl ^a   Ehrenfeld, Ellie ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH SUBJECT; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; MEDICAL RESEARCH; STATISTICS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIALS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1442309704     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.7.836     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Wyngaarden JB. The clinical investigator as an endangered species. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1254-1259.
2. Healy B. Innovators for the 21st century: will we face a crisis in biomedical-research brain power? N Engl J Med 1988;319:1058-1064.
3. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered-but still beloved. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2803-2812.
4. Schechter AN. The crisis in clinical research: endangering the half-century National Institutes of Health consensus. JAMA. 1998;280:1440-1442.
5. Shine KL. Encouraging clinical research by physician scientists. JAMA. 1998;280:1442-1444.
6. Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist: an essential- and fragile-link in the medical research chain. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:1621-1626.
7. Miller ED. Clinical investigators-the endangered species revisited. JAMA. 2001;286:845-846.
8. Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Moy E, Blumenthal D. Status of clinical research in academic health centers: views from the research leadership. JAMA. 2001;286: 800-806.
9. The NIH Director's Panel on Clinical Research report to the Advisory Committee to the NIH Director, December 1997. Available at: http://www.nih.gov/news/crp /97report/index.htm. Accessed March 21, 2003.
10. Zemlo TR, Garrison HH, Partridge NC, Ley TJ. The physician-scientist: career issues and challenges at the year 2000. FASEB J. 2000;14:221-230.
11. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003;289:1278-1287.
12. Neilson EG. The role of medical school admissions committees in the decline of physician-scientists. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:765-767.
13. Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE. Removing career obstacles for young physician-scientists-loan-repayment programs. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:368-373.
14. Nathan DG. Clinical research: perceptions, reality, and proposed solutions. JAMA. 1998;280:1427-1432.
15. Nathan DG. Careers in translational clinical research-historical perspectives, future challenges. JAMA. 2002;287:2424-2427.
16. Nathan DG, Varmus HE. The National Institutes of Health and clinical research: a progress report. Nat Med. 2000;6:1201-1204.
17. Nathan DG. Educational debt relief for clinical investigators-a vote of confidence. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:372-374.
18. Nathan DG, Wilson JD. Clinical research and the NIH-a report card. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1860-1865.
19. Williams GH, Wara DW, Carbone P. Funding for patient-oriented research: critical strain on a fundamental linchpin. JAMA. 1997;278:227-231.
20. Kelley WN, Randolph MA, eds. Careers in Clinical Research: Obstacles and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1994.
21. Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association. Breaking the Scientific Bottleneck: Report of the Graylyn Consensus Development Conference. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1990.
22. What is ARRQ? Available at: http://www .ahrq.gov/about/whatis.htm. Accessed January 28, 2004.
23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:150-174.
24. The measurement of inter-rater agreement. In: Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1981: 212-236.
25. The case of k-independent samples. In: Siegel S, Castellan NJ. Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1988: 190-223.
26. Shalala D. Protecting research subjects-what must be done. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:808-810.
27. Institute of Medicine. Preserving Public Trust: Accreditation and Human Research Participant Programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
28. Steinbrook R. Improving protection for research subjects. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1425-1430.
29. Taylor AE, Stubbs, C, Singer DE, Curhan G, Crowley WF. An instrument for determining the amount of NIH support for clinical investigations at one academic health center. Acad Med. 2002;77:824-830.
30. AAMC Data Book: Statistical Information Related to Medical Education. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2003.