Individual responses of mother sows to a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain lead to different microbiota composition in their offspring

Beneficial Microbes

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 345-356

  Starke, I C ^a   Pieper, R ^a   Neumann, K ^a   Zentek, J ^a   Vahjen, W ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

DGGE; Individuality; Microbiota; Piglets; Probiotics

Indexed keywords

CYLACTIN; PROBIOTIC AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CELL COUNT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA EXTRACTION; DRUG RESPONSE; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FECES MICROFLORA; FEMALE; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; LACTOBACILLUS AMYLOVORUS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MOTHER; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PIGLET; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROGENY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOW (SWINE); SUCKLING ANIMAL; SUPPLEMENTATION;

DGGE; INDIVIDUALITY; MICROBIOTA; PIGLETS; PROBIOTICS;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BACTERIA; BIOTA; DENATURING GRADIENT GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; ENTEROCOCCUS FAECIUM; FECES; FEMALE; INTESTINES; PREGNANCY; PROBIOTICS; SWINE;

EID: 84891613382     PISSN: 18762883     EISSN: 18762891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3920/BM2013.0021     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams, C.A., 2010. The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers. Nutrition Research Reviews 23: 37-46.
2. Arora, T., Singh, S. and Sharma, R.K., 2012. Probiotics: interaction with gut microbiome and antiobesity potential. Nutrition 29: 591-596.
3. Avershina, E., Storrø, O., Øien, T., Johnsen, R., Wilson, R., Egeland,T. and Rudi, K., 2013. Bifidobacterial succession and correlation networks in a large unselected cohort of mothers and their children. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79: 497-507.
4. Barrett, E., Kerr, C., Murphy, K., O'Sullivan, O., Ryan, C.A., Dempsey,E.M., Murphy, B.P., O'Toole, P.W., Cotter, P.D., Fitzgerald, G.F., Ross,R.P. and Stanton, C., 2013. The individual-specific and diverse nature of the preterm infant microbiota. Archives of Disease in Childhood 98: F334-F340.
5. Bauer, E., Williams, B.A., Smidt, H., Verstegen, M.W. and Mosenthin, R.,2006. Influence of the gastrointestinal microbiota on development of the immune system in young animals. Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology 7: 35-51.
6. Benson, A.K., Kelly, S.A., Legge, R., Ma, F., Low, S.J., Kim, J., Zhang,M., Oh, P.L., Nehrenberg, D., Hua, K., Kachman, S.D., Moriyama,E.N., Walter, J., Peterson, D.A. and Pomp, D., 2010. Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 18933-18938.
7. Bosi, P. and Trevisi, P., 2010. New topics and limits related to the use of beneficial microbes in pig feeding. Beneficial Microbes 1: 447-454.
8. Brunel, A. and Gouet, P., 1993. Influence of the destabilization of the maternal digestive microflora on that of the newborn rat. Biology of the Neonate 63: 236-245.
9. Carney-Hinkle, E.E., Tran, H., Bundy, J.W., Moreno, R., Miller, P.S.and Burkey, T.E., 2013. Effect of dam parity on litter performance,transfer of passive immunity, and progeny microbial ecology. Journal of Animal Science 91: 2885-2893.
10. Case, R.J., Boucher, Y., Dahllöf, I., Holmström, C., Doolittle, W.F. and Kjelleberg, S., 2007. Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73: 278-288.
11. Crosby, L.D. and Criddle, C.S., 2003. Understanding bias in microbial community analysis techniques due to rrn operon copy number heterogeneity. Biotechniques 34: 790-794.
12. Dahllöf, I., Baillie, H. and Kjelleberg, S., 2000. rpoB-based microbial community analysis avoids limitations inherent in 16S rRNA gene intraspecies heterogeneity. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66: 3376-3380.
13. Dicks, L. M. and Botes, M., 2010. Probiotic lactic acid bacteria in the gastro-intestinal tract: health benefits, safety and mode of action. Beneficial Microbes 1, 11-29.
14. Du, L., Somkuti, G.A. and Renye Jr., J.A., 2012. Molecular analysis of the bacteriocin-encoding plasmid pDGL1 from Enterococcus durans and genetic characterization of the durancin GL locus. Microbiology 158: 1523-1532.
15. Ercolini, D., 2004. PCR-DGGE fingerprinting: novel strategies for detection of microbes in food. Journal of Microbiology Methods 56: 297-314.
16. European Commission (EC), 2003. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. Official Journal of the European Union L 268: 29-43.
17. Fåk, F., Ahrné, S., Molin, G., Jeppsson, B. and Weström, B., 2008.Maternal consumption of Lactobacillus plantarum 299v affects gastrointestinal growth and function in the suckling rat. British Journal of Nutrition 100: 332-338.
18. Franz, C.M., Van Belkum, M.J., Holzapfel, W.H., Abriouel, H. and Gálvez, A., 2007. Diversity of enterococcal bacteriocins and their grouping in a new classification scheme. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 31: 293-310.
19. Fuller, R., 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 66: 365-378.
20. Gong, J., Yu, H., Liu, T., Gill, J.J., Chambers, J.R., Wheatcroft, R. and Sabour, P.M., 2008. Effects of zinc bacitracin, bird age and access to range on bacterial microbiota in the ileum and caeca of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Microbiology 104: 1372-1382.
21. Hu, C.B., Zendo, T., Nakayama, J. and Sonomoto, K., 2008. Description of durancin TW-49M, a novel enterocin B-homologous bacteriocin in carrot-isolated Enterococcus durans QU 49. Journal of Applied Microbiology 105: 681-690.
22. Inglis, G.D., Thomas, M.C., Thomas, D.K., Kalmokoff, M.L., Brooks,S.P. and Selinger, L.B., 2012. Molecular methods to measure intestinal bacteria: a review. Journal of AOAC International 95: 5-23.
23. Inoue, R., Tsukaharam, T., Nakanishim, N. and Ushida, K., 2005.Development of the intestinal microbiota in the piglet. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 51: 257-265.
24. Jadamus, A., Vahjen, W., Schaefer, K. and Simon, O., 2002. Influence of the probiotic strain Bacillus cereus var. toyoi on the development of enterobacterial growth and on selected parameters of bacterial metabolism in digesta samples of piglets. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 86: 42-54.
25. Kreuzer, S., Machnowska, P., Assmus, J., Sieber, M., Pieper, R., Schmidt, M.F., Brockmann, G.A., Scharek-Tedin, L. and Johne, R., 2012. Feeding of the probiotic bacterium Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 differentially affects shedding of enteric viruses in pigs. Veterinary Research 43: 58.
26. Kropf, S., Heuer, H., Gruning, M. and Smalla, K., 2004. Significance test for comparing complex microbial community fingerprints using pairwise similarity measures. Journal of Microbiology Methods 57: 187-195.
27. Kyriakis, S.C., Tsiloyiannis, V.K., Vlemmas, J., Sarris, K., Tsinas, A.C.,Alexopoulos, C. and Jansegers, L., 1999. The effect of probiotic LSP 122 on the control of post-weaning diarrhoea syndrome of piglets. Research in Veterinary Science 67: 223-228.
28. Lallès, J.P., Bosi, P., Smidt, H. and Stokes, C.R., 2007. Nutritional management of gut health in pigs around weaning. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 66: 260-268.
29. Leonard, S.G., Sweeney, T., Bahar, B. and O'Doherty, J.V., 2012. Effectof maternal seaweed extract supplementation on suckling piglet growth, humoral immunity, selected microflora, and immune response after an ex vivo lipopolysaccharide challenge. Journal of Animal Science 90: 505-514.
30. Macha, M., Taras, D., Vahjen, W., Arini, A. and Simon, O. 2004.Specific enumeration of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 in the intestinal tract and in faeces of piglets and sows. Archives of Animal Nutrition 58: 443-452.
31. Mulder, I.E., Schmidt, B., Lewis, M., Delday, M., Stokes, C.R., Bailey,M., Aminov, R.I., Gill, B.P., Pluske, J.R., Mayer, C.D. and Kelly, D.,2011. Restricting microbial exposure in early life negates the immune benefits associated with gut colonization in environments of high microbial diversity. PloS One 6: e28279.
32. Muyzer, G. and Smalla, K., 1998. Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) in microbial ecology. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73: 127-141.
33. O'Flaherty, S., Saulnier, D.M., Pot, B. and Versalovic, J., 2010. How can probiotics and prebiotics impact mucosal immunity? Gut Microbes 1: 293-300.
34. Ohashi, Y. and Ushida, K., 2009. Health-beneficial effects of probiotics:its mode of action. Animal Science Journal 80: 361-371.
35. O'Shea, E.F., Cotter, P.D., Ross, R.P. and Hill, C., 2013. Strategies to improve the bacteriocin protection provided by lactic acid bacteria. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 24: 130-134.
36. Peixoto, R.S., Da Costa Coutinho, H.L., Rumjanek, N.G., Macrae, A.and Rosado, A.S., 2002. Use of rpoB and 16S rRNA genes to analyse bacterial diversity of a tropical soil using PCR and DGGE. Letters in Applied Microbiology 35: 316-320.
37. Perumbakkam, S. and Craig, A.M., 2011. Design and in vitro evaluation of new rpoB-DGGE primers for ruminants. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 76: 156-169.
38. Petersson, A., Domig, K.J., Nagel, P., Zollitsch, W., Hagmüller, W. and Kneifeld, W., 2009. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)-based monitoring of intestinal lactobacilli and bifidobacteria of pigs during a feeding trial. Archives of Animal Nutrition 63: 112-126.
39. Purchiaroni, F., Tortora, A., Gabrielli, M., Bertucci, F., Gigante, G.,Ianiro, G., Ojetti, V., Scarpellini, E. and Gasbarrini, A., 2013. The role of intestinal microbiota and the immune system. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 17: 323-333.
40. Sanguinetti, C.J., Dias Neto, E. and Simpson, A.J., 1994. Rapid silver staining and recovery of PCR products separated on polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques 17: 914-921.
41. Sansom, B.F. and Gleed, P.T., 1981. The ingestion of sow's faeces by suckling piglets. British Journal of Nutrition 46: 451-456.
42. Sanz, Y., 2011. Gut microbiota and probiotics in maternal and infant health. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 94: 2000S-2005S.
43. Scharek, L., Guth, J., Reiter, K., Weyrauch, K. D., Taras, D., Schwerk,P., Schierack, P., Schmidt, M.F., Wieler, L.H. and Tedin, K., 2005.Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on development of the immune system of sows and piglets. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 105: 151-161.
44. Schloissnig, S., Arumugam, M., Sunagawa, S., Mitreva, M., Tap, J.,Zhu, A., Waller, A., Mende, D.R., Kultima, J.R., Martin, J., Kota,K., Sunyaev, S.R., Weinstock, G.M. and Bork, P., 2013. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493:45-50.
45. Schmidt, B., Mulder, I.E., Musk, C.C., Aminov, R.I., Lewis, M., Stokes,C.R., Bailey, M., Prosser, J.I., Gill, B.P., Pluske, J.R. and Kelly, D., 2011.Establishment of normal gut microbiota is compromised under excessive hygiene conditions. PloS ONE 6: e28284.
46. Servin, A.L., 2004. Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 28: 405-440.
47. Simpson, J.M., McCracken, V.J., White, B.A., Gaskins, H.R. and Mackie,R.I., 1999. Application of denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis for the analysis of the porcine gastrointestinal microbiota. Journal of Microbiological Methods 36: 167-179.
48. Spor, A., Koren, O. and Ley, R., 2011. Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome. Nature Reviews Microbiology 9: 279-290.
49. Taras, D., Vahjen, W., Macha, M. and Simon, O., 2005. Response of performance characteristics and faecal consistency to long-lasting dietary supplementation with the probiotic strain Bacillus cereus var.toyoi to sows and piglets. Archives of Animal Nutrition 59: 405-417.
50. Taras, D., Vahjen, W., Macha, M. and Simon, O., 2006. Performance, diarrhea incidence, and occurrence of Escherichia coli virulence genes during long-term administration of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain to sows and piglets. Journal of Animal Science 84:608-617.
51. Thompson, C.L., Wang, B. and Holmes, A.J., 2008. The immediate environment during postnatal development has long-term impact on gut community structure in pigs. ISME Journal 2: 739-748.
52. Thum, C., Cookson, A.L., Otter, D.E., McNabb, W.C., Hodgkinson,A.J., Dyer, J. and Roy, N.C., 2012. Can nutritional modulation of maternal intestinal microbiota influence the development of the infant gastrointestinal tract? Journal of Nutrition 142: 1921-1928.
53. Tourlomousis, P., Kemsley, E.K., Ridgway, K.P., Toscano, M.J.,Humphrey, T.J. and Narbad A., 2010. PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of complex microbial communities: a two-step approach to address the effect of gel-to-gel variation and allow valid comparisons across a large dataset. Microbial Ecology 59: 776-786.
54. Turnbaugh, P.J., Hamady, M., Yatsunenko, T., Cantarel, B.L., Duncan,A., Ley, R.E., Sogin, M.L., Jones, W.J., Roe, B.A., Affourtit, J.P.,Egholm, M., Henrissat, B., Heath, A.C., Knight, R. and Gordon,J.I., 2009. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457: 480-484.
55. Underdahl, N.R., 1983. The effect of feeding Streptococcus faecium upon Escherichia coli induced diarrhea in gnotobiotic pigs. Progress in Food and Nutrition Science 7: 5-12.
56. Vahjen, W., Taras, D. and Simon, O., 2007. Effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB10415 on cell numbers of total Enterococcus spp., E. faecium and E. faecalis in the intestine of piglets. Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology 8: 1-7.