The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 027-035

  Attar, Nuray ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Composite resin materials; Finishing; Polishing; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

RESIN; SEALANT; ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; BISCOVER; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOPOLISHING; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; ENAMEL; TOOTH FILLING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PARTICLE SIZE; RANDOMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ACRYLATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOCOMPOSITES; PARTICLE SIZE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 33846352900     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-1-27     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125(6):687-701.
2. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132(5):639-645.
3. Attar N, Turgut MD. Fluoride release and uptake capacities of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2003; 28(4):395-402.
4. Leinfelder KF. Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126(5):663-672.
5. Leinfelder KF, Radz GM, Nash RW. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19(3): 230-237.
6. Jackson RD, Morgan M. The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(3): 375-383.
7. Neme AM, Maxson BB, Pink FE, Aksu MN. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 2002; 27(6): 600-605.
8. 3M Dental Products Filtek TM Supreme Universal Restorative System. (2002). Technical product profile St. Paul MN 55144-1000, October:5-8.
9. Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004;29(2):203-211.
10. Albers HF. Placement and finishing, Tooth-colored restoratives principles and techniques, Ninth Edition, BC Decker Inc, 2002:157-181.
11. Neme AL, Frazier KB, Roeder LB, Debner TL. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 2002; 27(1):50-58.
12. Choi MS, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing. Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16(4):347-353.
13. Joniot SB, Gregoire GL, Auther AM, Roques YM. Three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins. Oper Dent 2000;25(4):311-315.
14. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. J Biomater Appl 2004; 19(2):121-134.
15. Borges AB, Marsilio AL, Pagani C, Rodrigues JR. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16(1):42-47.
16. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2003;19(1):12-18.
17. Strassler HE. Polishing composite resins. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4(5):177-179.
18. Barghi N, Lind SD. A guide to polishing direct composite resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21(2):138-144.
19. Tjan AH, Chan CA. The polishability of posterior composites. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61(2):138-146.
20. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2002;15(3):193-197.
21. Nagem Filho H, D'Azevedo MT, Nagem HD, Marsola FP. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 2003;14(1):37-41.
22. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: Effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004;29(3):275-279.
23. Üçtasli MB, Bala O, Güllü A. surface roughness of flowable and packable composite resin materials after finishing with abrasive discs. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31(12):1197-1202.
24. Mori G, Bassi MA, Baldi GGM, Giannoni M. Finishing of posterior composite surface: an AFM study. J Dent Res 2001; 80:1239 (Abst. no. 312).
25. Hergott AM, Ziemiecki TL, Dennison JB. An evaluation of different composite resin systems finished with various abrasives. J Am Dent Assoc1989; 119(6):729-732.
26. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124(7):68-72.
27. May KN, Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD, Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1996; 9(3):133-136.
28. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000; 25(6):534-543.
29. Jung M. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments. Oper Dent 1997; 22(3):98-104.
30. Pedrini D, Candido MSM, Rodriques AL. Analysis of surface roughness of glass-ionomer cements and compomer. J Oral Rehab 2003; 30(7)714-719.
31. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91(1):101-106.
32. Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater 1985; 1(6):225-227.
33. Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10(5):325-330.