Pulse pressure variation does not reflect stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated rats with lipopolysaccharide-induced pneumonia

Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 98-104

  Cherpanath, Thomas G V ^a   Smeding, Lonneke ^b   Lagrand, Wim K ^a   Hirsch, Alexander ^a   Schultz, Marcus J ^a   Groeneveld, Johan A B ^b  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arterial compliance; Haemodynamic parameters; Hypovolaemia; Lipopolysaccharide; Mechanical ventilation; Pulse pressure; Sepsis; Stroke volume

Indexed keywords

ESCHERICHIA COLI LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CAROTID ARTERY; CAVA VEIN OBSTRUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART PRELOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HYPOVOLEMIA; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE INDUCED PNEUMONIA; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE-INDUCED AIRWAY INFLAMMATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PNEUMONIA; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; RAT; RESPIRATORY TRACT PARAMETERS; SEPSIS; STROKE VOLUME VARIATION; VENA CAVA BALLOON;

ARTERIAL COMPLIANCE; HAEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HYPOVOLAEMIA; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; PULSE PRESSURE; SEPSIS; STROKE VOLUME;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BALLOON OCCLUSION; BLOOD PRESSURE; HEMODYNAMICS; HYPOVOLEMIA; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDES; MALE; PNEUMONIA; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; SEPSIS; STROKE VOLUME; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR;

EID: 84891400400     PISSN: 03051870     EISSN: 14401681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.12187     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001; 345: 1368-77.
2. Sakr Y, Vincent JL, Reinhart K et al. High tidal volume and positive fluid balance are associated with worse outcome in acute lung injury. Chest 2005; 128: 3098-108.
3. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 354: 2564-75.
4. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2004; 21: 132-8.
5. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variations to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31: 1399-404.
6. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419-28.
7. Gödje O, Höke K, Goetz AE et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit. Care Med. 2002; 30: 52-8.
8. Montenij LJ, de Waal EE, Buhre WF. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2011; 24: 651-6.
9. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128: 848-54.
10. Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med. 2011; 37: 1672-9.
11. Stergiopulos N, Meister JJ, Westerhof N. Evaluation of methods for estimation of total arterial compliance. Am. J. Physiol. 1995; 268: H1540-8.
12. Pinsky MR. Heart lung interactions during mechanical ventilation. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2012; 18: 256-60.
13. Ludbrook J. Repeated measurements and multiple comparisons in cardiovascular research. Cardiovasc. Res. 1994; 28: 303-11.
14. Ludbrook J. A primer for biomedical scientists on how to execute Model II linear regression analysis. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2012; 39: 329-35.
15. Monnet X, Letierce A, Hamzaoui O et al. Arterial pressure allows monitoring the changes in cardiac output induced by volume expansion but not by norepinephrine. Crit. Care Med. 2011; 39: 1394-9.
16. Pierrakos C, Velissaris D, Scolletta S, Heenen S, De Backer D, Vincent JL. Can changes in arterial pressure be used to detect changes in cardiac index during fluid challenge in patients with septic shock? Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38: 422-8.
17. Rudiger A, Singer M. Mechanisms of sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction. Crit. Care Med. 2007; 35: 1599-608.
18. Chemla D, Hebert JL, Coirault C et al. Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am. J. Physiol. 1998; 274: H500-5.
19. Hatib F, Jansen JR, Pinsky MR. Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011; 111: 853-60.
20. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999; 159: 935-9.
21. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: Comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2012; 29: 64-9.
22. Biais M, Cottenceau V, Stecken L et al. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method. Crit. Care Med. 2012; 40: 1186-91.
23. Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL et al. Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30: 1182-7.
24. Pinsky MR. Probing the limits of arterial pulse contour analysis to predict preload responsiveness. Anesth. Analg. 2003; 96: 1245-7.
25. Wajima Z, Shiga T, Imanaga K, Inoue T. Do induced hypertension and hypotension affect stroke volume variation in man? J. Clin. Anesth. 2012; 24: 207-11.
26. Hadian M, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients. J. Crit. Care 2011; 26: 328.
27. Kubitz JC, Forkl S, Annecke T, Kronas N, Goetz AE, Reuter DA. Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34: 1520-4.
28. Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Forkl S et al. Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload. Br. J. Anaesth. 2007; 98: 591-7.
29. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, Revel P, Sztark F. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br. J. Anaesth. 2008; 101: 761-8.
30. Reuter DA, Goepfert MS, Goresh T, Schmoeckel M, Kilger E, Goetz AE. Assessing fluid responsiveness during open chest conditions. Br. J. Anaesth. 2004; 94: 318-23.
31. Pinsky MR. Applied physiology at the bedside. In: Vincent JL (ed.). Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. 2002; 534-51.
32. Pinsky MR. Protocolized cardiovascular management based on ventricular-arterial coupling. In: Pinsky MR, Payen D (eds). Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 2006; 381-95.
33. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to Volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit. Care 2011; 15: R15.
34. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000; 342: 1301-8.
35. Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, Jin N. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Anesth. 2011; 25: 904-16.
36. Migneco F, Huang YC, Coyan GN, Birla RK. New and simplified method for multiple left ventricle catheterizations in small animals. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2008; 7: 925-7.
37. Heimisch W, Schad H, Günzinger R. Left ventricular volume measurement by the conductance catheter and variations in the hematocrit in small animals. Cardiovasc. Eng. 2007; 7: 43-6.
38. Kuo TB, Yang CC, Chan SH. Transfer function analysis of ventilatory influence on systemic arterial pressure in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1996; 271: H2108-15.
39. Yang CC, Yeh IT, Lai HY, Chen HI, Kuo TB. Dynamic effect of respiration on aortic blood flow and its autonomic control in rats. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2008; 35: 1294-300.
40. Lai HY, Yang CC, Huang FY, Lee Y, Kuo YL, Kuo TB. Respiratory-related arterial pressure variability as an indicator of graded blood loss: Involvement of the autonomic nervous system. Clin. Sci. 2003; 105: 491-7.
41. Vaschetto R, Kuiper JW, Musters RJ et al. Renal hypoperfusion and impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in an animal model of VILI. The role of the peroxynitrite-PARP pathway. Crit. Care 2010; 14: R45.
42. Smeding L, Plötz FB, Lamberts RR, van der Laarse WJ, Kneyber MC, Groeneveld AB. Mechanical ventilation with high tidal volumes attenuates myocardial dysfunction by decreasing cardiac edema in a rat model of LPS-induced peritonitis. Respir. Res. 2012; 13: 23.