Heart lung interactions during mechanical ventilation

Current Opinion in Critical Care

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 256-260

  Pinsky, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

acute lung injury; functional hemodynamic monitoring; hemodynamic monitoring; vasomotor tone; volume responsiveness

Indexed keywords

HYPERTENSIVE FACTOR;

ACUTE LUNG INJURY; ADRENERGIC SYSTEM; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BLOOD VOLUME; BODY POSTURE; HEART; HEART RIGHT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; LUNG; PATIENT MONITORING; PULSE PRESSURE; REVIEW; THORAX PRESSURE; TIDAL VOLUME; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BLOOD PRESSURE; HEART; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LUNG; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 84861227335     PISSN: 10705295     EISSN: 15317072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283532b73     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Pinsky MR. Determinants of pulmonary artery flow variation during respiration. J Appl Physiol 1984; 56:1237-1245.
2. Wallis TW, Robotham JL, Compean R, et al. Mechanical heart-lung interaction with positive end-expiratory pressure. J Appl Physiol 1983; 54:1039-1047.
3. Garcia X, Pinsky MR. Clinical applicability of functional hemodynamic monitoring. Ann Crit Care 2011; 1:35.
4. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-1.
5. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:517-523.
6. Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, sampling duration and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation during positivepressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:2858-2862.
7. Oliveira RH, Azevedo LCP, Park M, Schettino GPP. Influence of ventilatory settings on static and functional haemodynamic parameters during experimental hypovolaemia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009; 26:66-72.
8. Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:1672-1679.
9. Vallée F, Richard JCM, Mari A, et al. Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2099; 35:1004-1010.
10. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefè vre D, et al. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011; 15:R85.
11. Wiklund C, Morel D, Orbring-Wiklund H, et al. Influence of tidal volume on pulse pressure variations in hypovolemic ventilated pigs with acute respiratory distress-like syndrome. Anesthesiology 2010; 113:630-638.
12. Da Silva Ramos FJ, de Oliveira EM, Park M, et al. Heart-lung interactions with different ventilatory settings during acute lung injury and hypovolaemia: an experimental study. Br J Anaes 2011; 106:394-402.
13. Lee CH, Wang JY, Huang KL, et al. Unreliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output in piglets simulating acute hemorrhagic shock and rapid volume expansion. J Trauma 2010; 68:1357-1361.
14. Suehiro K, Okutani R. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anes 2010; 24:772-775.
15. Biais M, Bernard O, Ha C, et al. Abilities of pulse pressure variations and stroke volume variations to predict fluid responsiveness in prone position during scoliosis surgery. Br J Anaes 2010; 104:407-413.
16. Hadian M, Severyn D, Pinsky MR. The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients. J Crit Care 2011; 26:328.el-328.e8.
17. Monge MI, Cano AG, Garcia M. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 2011; 15:R15.
18. Maisch S, Bohm SH, Solà J, et al. Heart-lung interactions measured by electrical impedance tomography. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:2173-2176.
19. Teboul JL, Monnet X. Just fastening the belt! Is it the future measure for assessing fluid responsiveness? [editorial]. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:2200-2201.
20. Reisnera AT, Xu D, Ryan KL, et al. Monitoring noninvasive cardiac output and stroke volume during experimental human hypovolaemia and resuscitation. Br J Anaes 2011; 106:23-30.
21. Lee CH, Wang JY, Wu YK, et al. Pulse pressure power spectrum predicts volume responsiveness in shock patients without sedation. Shock 2010; 33:454-459.
22. Belda1 FJ, Aguilar G, Teboul JL, et al. Complications related to less-invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Br J Anaes 2011; 106:482-486.
23. Dufour N, Chemla D, Teboul JL, et al. Changes in pulse pressure following fluid loading: a comparison between aortic root (noninvasive tonometry) and femoral artery (invasive recordings). Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:942-949.
24. Maguire S, Rinehart J, Vakharia S, Cannesson M. Respiratory variation in pulse pressure and plethysmographic waveforms: Intraoperative applicability in a North American academic center. Anes Analg 2011; 112:94-96.
25. Sipkens LM, Treskes K, Ariese-Beldman K, et al. Application of Nexfin noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure monitoring in autonomic function testing. Blood Press Monit 2011; 16:246-251.
26. Della Rocca G, Pompei L. Goal-directed therapy in anesthesia: any clinical impact or just a fashion? Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77:545-553.