The political science of European trade policy: A literature review with a research outlook

Comparative European Politics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 101-119

  Poletti, Arlo ^a   De Biévre, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891107611     PISSN: 14724790     EISSN: 1740388X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/cep.2012.35     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Aggarwal, V. and Fogarty, E. (2004) EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Baccini, L. and Dür, A. (2012)The new regionalism and policy interdependence. British Journal of Political Science 42(1): 57-79.
3. Baldwin, M. (2006) EU trade politics: Heaven or hell?Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 926-942.
4. Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (1999) The European Union as a Global Actor. London: Routledge.
5. Collinson, S. (1999) 'Issue systems', 'multilevel games' and the analysis of the EU's external commercial and associated policies: A research design. Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 206-224.
6. Conceiç á o-Heldt, E. (2011a)Who controls whom? Dynamics of power delegation and agency losses in EU trade politics. Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4): 1107-1126.
7. Conceiç á O-Heldt, E. (2011b) Variation in EU member states' preferences and the commission's discretion in the Doha round. Journal of European Public Policy 18(3): 403-419.
8. Daugbjerg, C. and Swinbank, A. (2008) Curbing exceptionalism: The EU response to external challenge. The World Economy 31(5): 631-652.
9. Davis, C. (2004) International institutions and issue linkage: Building support for agricultural trade liberalization. American Political Science Review 98(1): 153-168.
10. De Bièvre, D. and Dür, A. (2005) Constituency interests and delegation in European and American trade policy. Comparative Political Studies 38(10): 1271-1296. (Pubitemid 41756078)
11. De Bièvre, D. and Eckhardt, J. (2011) Interest groups and EU anti-dumping policy. Journal of European Public Policy 18(3): 339-360.
12. Delreux, T. and Kerremans, B. (2010) How agents weaken their principals' incentives to control. Journal of European Integration 17(2): 205-223.
13. Duchêne, F. (1973) The European community and the uncertainties of interdependence. In: H. Kohnstamm and W. Hager (eds.) A Nation Writ Large? Foreign-Policy Problems before the European Community. London: Macmillan Press, pp.1-21.
14. Dür, A. (2006) Assessing the EU's role in international trade negotiations. European Political Science 5(4): 362-376.
15. Dür, A. (2007a) Foreign discrimination, protection for exporters and US trade liberalization. International Studies Quarterly 51(2): 457-480. (Pubitemid 47039951)
16. Dür, A. (2007b) Avoiding deadlock in European trade policy: Veto players and issue linkages. In: D. De Bièvre and C. Neuhold (eds.) Dynamics and Obstacles of European Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
17. Dür, A. (2007c) EU trade policy as protection for exporters: The agreements with Mexico and Chile. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 833-855.
18. Dür, A. (2008a) Bargaining power and trade liberalization: European external trade policies in the 1960s. European Journal of International Relations 14(4): 645-669.
19. Dür, A. (2008b) Bringing economic interests back into the study of EU trade policy-making. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10(1): 27-45.
20. Dür, A. (2010) Protection for Exporters: Power and Discrimination in Transatlantic Trade Relations, 1930-2010. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21. Dür, A. (2011) Fortress Europe or liberal Europe? The single market programme and EU's external policies. Journal of European Public Policy 18(5): 619-635.
22. Dür, A. and De Bièvre, D. (2007) Inclusion without influence: NGOs in European trade policy. Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 79-101. (Pubitemid 46151898)
23. Dür, A. and Zimmermann, H. (2007) Introduction: The EU in international trade negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 771-787.
24. Eckhardt, J. (2011) Firm lobbying and EU trade policy making: Reflections on the anti-dumping case against Chinese and Vietnamese shoes. Journal of World Trade 45(5): 965-991.
25. Ehrlich, S. (2007) Access to protection: Domestic institutions and trade policies in democracies. International Organization 61(3): 571-605.
26. Elgström, O. and Frenhoff-Larsén, M. (2010) Free to trade?: Commission autonomy in the Economic Partnership Agreement negotiations. Journal of European Public Policy 17(2): 205-223.
27. Elsig, M. (2007) The EU's choice of regulatory venues for trade negotiations: A tale of agency power. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 927-948.
28. Elsig, M. (2010) European Union trade policy after enlargement: Larger crowds, shifting priorities, and informal decision making. Journal of European Public Policy 17(6): 781-798.
29. Falke, A. (2005) EU-USA trade relations in the Doha development round: Market access versus a post-modern trade policy agenda. European Foreign Affairs Review 10(3): 339-357. (Pubitemid 41197685)
30. Farrell, M. (2005) A triumph of realism over idealism? Cooperation between the European Union and Africa. Journal of European Integration 27(3): 263-283.
31. Frenhoff-Larsén, M. (2007) Trade negotiations between the EU and South Africa: A three level game. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 857-881.
32. Ginsberg, R.H. (1999) Conceptualizing the European Union as an international actor: Narrowing the theoretical capability-expectation gap. Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 429-454.
33. Gordon, P. (1998) Europe's uncommon foreign policy. International Security 22(3): 74-100. (Pubitemid 128017493)
34. Gschwend, T. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2007) Research Design in Political Science. How to Practice What They Preach. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
35. Hanson, B. (1998) What happened to fortress Europe? External trade policy liberalization in the European Union. International Organization 52(1): 55-85. (Pubitemid 128348086)
36. Heron, T. and Siles-Brügge, G. (2012) Competitive liberalization and the 'Global Europe' services and investment agenda: Locating the commercial drivers of the EU-ACP economic partnership agreements. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(2): 250-266.
37. Hix, S. (1999) The Political System of the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
38. Hix, S., Noury, A. and Roland, G. (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Hocking, B. (2004) Changing the terms of trade policy-making: From the 'club' to the 'multistakeholder' model. World Trade Review 3(1): 3-26.
40. Holmes, P. (2006) Trade and 'domestic' policies: The European mix. Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 811-827.
41. Hurt, S. (2003) Co-operation and coercion? The Cotonou agreement between the European Union and ACP states and the end of the Lomé convention. Third World Quarterly 24(1): 161-176. (Pubitemid 36145142)
42. Jacoby, W. and Meunier, S. (2010) Europe and the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy 17(3): 299-317.
43. Kerremans, B. (2004) What went wrong in Cancun? A principal-agent view on the EU's rationale towards the Doha development round. European Foreign Affairs Review 9(3): 363-393. (Pubitemid 39224868)
44. Kerremans, B. and Martins-Gystelinck, M. (2009) Interest aggregation, political parties, labour standards and trade: Differences in the US and EU approaches to the inclusion of labour standards in international trade agreements. European Foreign Affairs Review 14(5): 683-701.
45. Kerremans, B. and Orbie, J. (2009) The social dimension of European Union trade policies. European Foreign Affairs Review 14(5): 629-641.
46. Kono, D.Y. (2008) Does public opinion affect trade policy?Business and Politics 10(2): 1-19.
47. Kono, D.Y. (2009) Market structure, electoral institutions, and trade policy. International Studies Quarterly 53(4): 885-906.
48. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty Six Countries. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
49. Lowi, T. (1972) Four systems of policy, politics and choice. Public Administration Review 33(4): 298-310.
50. Lucarelli, S. and Manners, I. (eds.) (2006) Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy. London and New York: Routledge.
51. Mansfield, E.D. and Busch, M.L. (1995) The political economy of nontariff barriers: A cross national analysis. International Organization 49(4): 723-749.
52. Mansfield, E.D., Milner, H. and Pevehouse, J. (2007) Vetoing cooperation: The impact of veto players of preferential trading arrangements. British Journal of Political Science 37(3): 403-432.
53. Meunier, S. (2000) What single voice? European institutions and EU-US trade negotiations. International Organization 54(1): 103-135.
54. Meunier, S. (2003) Trade policy and political legitimacy in the European Union. Comparative European Politics 1(1): 67-90.
55. Meunier, S. (2005) Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Meunier, S. and Nicolaidis, K. (1999) Who speaks for Europe? The delegation of trade authority in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 477-501.
57. Meunier, S. and Nicolaídis, K. (2006) The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 906-925. (Pubitemid 44155126)
58. Moyer, W.H. (1993) The European community and the GATT Uruguay round: Preserving the common agricultural policy at all costs. In: W.P. Avery (ed.) World Agriculture and the GATT. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
59. Nicolaidis, K. and Meunier, S. (2002) Revisiting trade competence in the European Union: Amsterdam, nice and beyond. In: M. Hosli and A. van Deemen (eds.) Institutional Challenges in the European Union. London: Routledge.
60. Niemann, A. (2004) Between communicative action and strategic action: The Article 113 Committee and the negotiations of the WTO basic Telecommunications Services Agreement. Journal of European Public Policy 11(3): 379-407.
61. Paarlberg, R. (1997) Agricultural policy reform and the Uruguay round: Synergistic linkage in a two level game?International Organization 51(3): 413-444.
62. Patterson, L.A. (1997) Agricultural reform in the European community: A three-level game analysis. International Organization 51(1): 135-165. (Pubitemid 127343849)
63. Poletti, A. (2012) The European Union and Multilateral Trade Governance: The Politics of the Doha Round. London: Routledge.
64. Reichert, S. and Jungblut, B. (2007) European Union external trade policy: Multi-level principal agent relationships. Policy Studies Journal 35(3): 395-418. (Pubitemid 350020753)
65. Richardson, J. (2001) European Union: Power and Policy-making. London: Routledge.
66. Rickard, S. (2010) Democratic differences: Electoral institutions and compliance with GATT/WTO agreements. European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 711-729.
67. Rickard, S. (2012) A non-tariff protectionist bias in majoritarian politics: Government subsidies and electoral institutions. International Studies Quarterly, (in press).
68. Risse-Kappen, T. (1991) Public opinion, domestic structures, and foreign policy in liberal democracies. World Politics 43(4): 479-512.
69. Rogowski, R. (1987) Trade and the variety of democratic institutions. International Organization 41(2): 203-224.
70. Schuknecht, L. (1992) Trade Protection in the European Community. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.
71. Shaffer, G. (2006) What's new in EU trade dispute settlement? Judicialization, public-private networks and the WTO legal order. Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 832-850. (Pubitemid 44155125)
72. Siles-Brügge, R. (2011) Resisting protectionism after the crisis: Strategic economic discourse and the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement. New Political Economy 16(5): 627-653.
73. Smith, M. (2001) The European Union's commercial policy: Between coherence and fragmentation. Journal of European Public Policy 8(5): 787-802.
74. Smith, M.A. (2000) American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75. Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
76. Ugur, M. (1998) Explaining protectionism and liberalization in the European Union trade policy: The case of textiles and clothing. Journal of European Public Policy 5(4): 652-670. (Pubitemid 128692430)
77. Van den Hoven, A. (2002) Interest Group Influence on Trade Policy in a Multilevel Polity: Analysing the EU Position at the Doha WTO Ministerial Conference. Florence: European University Institute Working Paper 2002/67.
78. Van den Hoven, A. (2004) Assuming leadership in multilateral economic institutions: The EU's development round discourse and strategy. West European Politics 27(2): 256-283.
79. Van den Hoven, A. (2006) European Union regulatory capitalism and multilateral trade negotiations. In: S. Lucarelli and I. Manners (eds.) Values and Principles in European Foreign Policy. London, New York: Routledge.
80. Verdier, D. (1994) Democracy and International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
81. Warntjen, A., Hix, S. and Crombez, C. (2008) The party political make-up of EU Institutions. Journal of European Public Policy 15(8): 1243-1253.
82. Woll, C. (2006a) Trade Policy Lobbying in the European Union: Who Captures Whom? Paris Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Internationales Working Paper 6/7.
83. Woll, C. (2006b) Lobbying in the European Union: From sui generis to a comparative perspective. Journal of European Public Policy 13(3): 456-469. (Pubitemid 43398965)
84. Woll, C. (2008) Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
85. Woll, C. and Artigas, A. (2007) When trade liberalization turns into regulatory reform: The impact on business-government relations in international trade politics. Regulation and Governance 1(2): 121-138.
86. Wonka, A. (2007) Technocratic and independent? The appointment of European commissioners and its policy implications. Journal of European Public Policy 14(2): 171-191.
87. Woolcock, S. (2000) European Union trade policy: Global pressures and domestic constraints. In: H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds.) Policy Making in the European Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
88. Woolcock, S. (2005) Trade policy: From Uruguay to Doha and beyond. In: H. Wallace, W. Wallace and M. Pollack (eds.) Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
89. Yee, A.S. (2004) Cross-national concepts in supranational governance: State-society relations and EU policymaking. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 17(4): 87-524.
90. Young, A. (2000) The adaptation of European foreign economic policy: From Rome to Seattle. Journal of Common Market Studies 38(1): 93-116.
91. Young, A. (2004) The incidental fortress: The single market and world trade. Journal of Common Market Studies 2(2): 393-414. (Pubitemid 38739798)
92. Young, A. (2007) Trade politics ain't what it used to be: The European Union in the Doha round. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 789-811.
93. Young, A. and Peterson, J. (2006) The EU and the new trade politics. Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 795-814. (Pubitemid 44155122)
94. Zimmermann, H. (2007) Realist power Europe? The EU in the negotiations about China's and Russia's WTO accession. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(4): 813-832.