Trade and 'domestic' policies: The European mix

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 815-831

  Holmes, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

European Union; Regulation; Single market; Sovereignty; Trade; World Trade Organization

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746658648     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501760600837138     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cecchini, P. et al. (1988) The European Challenge 1992: The Benefits of a Single Market, Aldershot: Gower.
2. Charnovitz, S. (2005) 'An analysis of Pascal Lamy's proposal on collective preferences', Journal of International Economic Law 8(2): 449-72.
3. De Bièvre, D. (2006) 'The EU regulatory trade agenda and the quest for WTO enforcement', Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 847-62.
4. Evans, D., Holmes, P., Rollo, J., Young, A.R. and Zahariadis, Y. (2001) 'Global norms creation and norms competition', Report for DG Trade, Brussels: European Commission.
5. Evans, P. (2003) 'Is trade policy democratic and should it be?', in N. Bayne and S. Woolcock (eds), The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations, London: Ashgate, pp. 147-59.
6. Heiskanen, V. (2004) The regulatory philosophy of international trade law', Journal of World Trade 38: 1-36.
7. Higgott, R. and Weber, H. (2005) 'GATS in context: development, an evolving lex mercatoria and the Doha agenda', Review of International Political Economy 12(3): 434-55.
8. Holmes, P. (2001) 'The EU and the WTO: some constitutional comparisons', in G. de Búrca and J. Scott (eds), The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues, Oxford: Hart, pp. 59-80.
9. Holmes, P. and Stevens, C. (2005) 'How constraining is GATS?'. Paper presented to ESRC Seminar on Trade and Labour, University of Sussex, 1 December 2005.
10. Holmes, P. and Young, A.R. (2001) 'European lessons for multilateral economic integration: a cautionary tale', in Z. Drabek (ed.), Globalization under Threat: The Stability of Trade Policy and International Agreements, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 203-26.
11. Holmes, P. and Young, A.R. (2002) 'Liberalizing and reregulating telecommunications in Europe: a common framework and persistent differences', in P. Guerrieri and H.E. Scharrer (eds), Trade, Investment and Competition Policies in the Global Economy: The Case of the International Telecommunications Regime, HWWA Studies of the Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Vol. 69, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 119-58.
12. Howse, R. and Nicolaidis, K. (2001) 'Legitimacy and global governance: why constitutionalizing the WTO is a step too far', in R. Porter et al. (eds), Efficiency, Equity and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 227-52.
13. Howse, R. and Tuerk, E. (2001) 'The WTO impact on internal regulations - a case study of the Canada-EC asbestos dispute', in G. de Búrca and J. Scott (eds), The EU and the WTO: Legal and Constitutional Issues, Oxford: Hart, pp. 283-328.
14. Krajewski, M. (2005) 'Playing by the rules of the game? Specific commitments after US - Gambling and Betting and the current GATS negotiations', WTO Appellate Body Report, 20 April 2005, WT/DS285/AB/R, 'United States - Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services', Legal Issues of Economic Integration 32: 417-47.
15. Lamy, P. (2004) The emergence of collective preferences in international trade: implications for regulating globalization'. Conference on Collective Preferences and Global Governance: What Future for the Multilateral Trading System?, Brussels, 15 September 2004. http://europa.eu.int/comm/archives/ commission_1999_2004/lamy/speeches_articles/spla242_en.htm
16. Marceau, G. and Trachtman, J.P. (2002) 'TBT, SPS, and GATT: a map of the WTO law of domestic regulation', Journal of World Trade 36: 811-81.
17. Mathis, J.H. (2005) 'Gambling - with regulation and market access in the GATS', Legal Issues of Economic Integration 32(3): 231-4.
18. Nicolaïdis, K. (1997) 'Mutual recognition of regulatory regimes: some lessons and prospects', http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/97/97-07. html
19. Pauwelyn, J. (2005) 'Rien ne va plus? Distinguishing domestic regulation from market access in GATT and GATS', World Trade Review 4(2): 131-70.
20. Pelkmans, J. (2003) Mutual Recognition in Goods and Services: An Economic Perspective, ENEPRI Working Paper No. 16.
21. Porter, R., Sauvé, P., Subramanian, A. and Beriglia Zampetti, M. (eds) (2001) Efficiency, Equity, Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
22. Shaffer, G. (2006) 'What's new in EU trade dispute settlement? Judicialization, public-private networks and the WTO legal order', Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 828-46.
23. Weiler, J.J.H. (1999) 'The constitution of the common market place', in P. Craig and G. de Búrca (eds), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 349-76.
24. Wellenius, B., Galarza, J. and Guermazi, B. (2005) Telecommunications and the WTO: the case of Mexico'. www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/ WDSP/IB/2005/10/21/000016406_20051021103720/Rendered/PDF/wps3759.pdf
25. Young, A.R. and Holmes, P. (2006) 'Protection or protectionism? EU food safety and the WTO', in C. Ansell and D. Vogel (eds), What's the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 281-306.
26. Young, A.R. and Peterson, J. (2006) 'The EU and the new trade politics,' Journal of European Public Policy 13(6): 791-810.