Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 62, Issue , 2014, Pages 55-67

  Baroud, Hiba ^a   Barker, Kash ^a   Ramirez Marquez, Jose E ^b   Rocco S , Claudio M ^c  

^a University of Oklahoma   (United States)

^b STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Importance measures; Inland waterways; Network resilience

Indexed keywords

NAVIGATION SYSTEMS;

CASE-STUDIES; COMMODITY FLOW; COMPONENT IMPORTANCE; DATA DRIVEN; IMPORTANCE MEASURE; MISSISSIPPI RIVER; NETWORK RESILIENCE; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; STOCHASTICS; TIME DEPENDENT;

STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

OPTIMIZATION; STOCHASTICITY; WATERWAY TRANSPORT;

MISSISSIPPI RIVER; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84890963802     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abdel-Rahim A., Oman P., Johnson B., Tung L.-W. Survivability analysis of large-scale intelligent transportation system networks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2007, 2022:9-20.
2. Al-Deek H., Emam E.B. New methodology for estimating reliability in transportation networks with degraded link capacities. J. Intell. Transp. Syst.: Technol., Plann., Oper. 2006, 10(3):117-129.
3. Al-Sharrah G. Ranking using the Copeland score: a comparison with the Hasse diagram. J. Chem. Inform. Models 2010, 50(5):785-791.
4. American Society for Civil Engineers, 2009. Report Card on America's Infrastructure 2009.
5. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2013. Testimony of Andrew H. Cairns on Behalf of the American Society of Civil Engineers before the Environment and Public Works Committee, United States Senate, on the Water Resources Development Act.
6. Babcock M.W., Lu X. Forecasting inland waterway grain traffic. Transp. Res. Part E: Log. Transp. Rev. 2002, 38(1):65-74.
7. Barker K., Ramirez-Marquez J.E., Rocco C.M. Resilience-based network component importance measures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2013, 117(1):89-97.
8. Baroud, H., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E. Barker, K., Rocco, C.M., 2013a. Stochastic measures of network resilience: application to waterway commodity flows. Risk Anal., in press.
9. Baroud, H., Barker, K., Grant, F.H., 2013b. Multiobjective stochastic inoperability decision tree for infrastructure preparedness. J. Infrastruct. Syst., in press.
10. Baroud, H., Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Rocco, C.M., 2013c. Modeling resilience in infrastructure networks: inherent costs and interdependent impacts. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, New York City, NY, June 2013.
11. Bell M.G.H., Iida Y. Transportation Network Analysis 1997, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
12. Beuthe M., Jourquin B., Greets J., Ha C.K.N. Freight transportation demand elasticities: a geographic multimodal transportation network analysis. Transp. Res. Part E: Log. Transp. Rev. 2011, 37(4):253-266.
13. Bruneau M., Chang S.E., Eguchi R.T., Lee G.C., O'Rourke T.D., Reinhorn A.M., Shinozuka M., Tierney K., Wallace W.A., von Winterfeldt D. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq. Spectra 2003, 19(4):733-752.
14. Cadarso, Marin L.A., Maroti G. Recovery of disruptions in rapid transit networks. Transp. Res. Part E 2013, 53:15-33.
15. Carpenter S., Walker B., Anderies J.M., Abel N. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to whatα. Ecosystems 2001, 4(8):765-781.
16. Chen A., Yang H., Lo H.K., Tang W.H. A capacity related reliability for transportation networks. J. Adv. Transp. 1999, 33(2):183-200.
17. Chen A., Yang C., Kongsomsaksakul S., Lee M. Network-based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks. Networks Spatial Econ. 2007, 7(3):241-256.
18. Chen L., Miller-Hooks E. Resilience: an indicator of recovery capability in intermodal freight transport. Transportation Science 2012, 46(1):109-123.
19. Crucitti P., Latora V., Marchiori M. Locating critical lines in high-voltage electric power grids. Fluctuat. Noise Lett. 2005, 5(2):L201-L208.
20. Department of Homeland Security, 2009. National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Homeland Security.
21. Dentcheva D., Ruszczyński A. Optimization with stochastic dominance constraints. Siam. J. Optimiz. 2003, 14(2):548-566.
22. Dentcheva D., Ruszczyński A. Semi-infinite probabilistic optimization: First order stochastic dominance constraints. Optimization 2004, 53(5-6):583-601.
23. Folga S., Allison T., Seda-Sanabria Y., Matheu E., Milam T., Ryan R., Peerenboom J. A systems-level methodology for the analysis of inland waterway infrastructure disruptions. J. Transp. Secur. 2009, 4(2):122-136.
24. Protecting the Nation's Seaports: Balancing Security and Cost 2006, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA. J.D. Haveman, S. Howard (Eds.).
25. Henry D., Ramirez-Marquez J.E. Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012, 99(1):114-122.
26. Holling C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1973, 4(1):1-23.
27. Hongwei, M., Xizhao, Z., Liyou, F., 2012. Study on the reliability of travel time in transportation network. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application, pp. 545-548.
28. Houck D.J., Kim E., O'Reilly G.P., Picklesimer D.D., Uzunalioglu H. A network survivability model for critical national infrastructures. Bell Labs Tech. J. 2004, 8(4):153-172.
29. Ip W.H., Wang D. Resilience and friability of transportation networks: evaluation, analysis and optimization. IEEE Syst. J. 2011, 5(2):189-198.
30. Jackson, S., 2007. System resilience: capabilities, culture, and infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the INCOSE Annual International Symposium.
31. Jenelius E., Petersen T., Mattsson L.-G. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transp. Res. Part A 2006, 40(7):537-560.
32. Johansson J., Hassel H. An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2010, 95(12):1335-1344.
33. Johansson J., Hassel H., Cedergren A. Vulnerability analysis of interdependent critical infrastructures: case study of the Swedish railway system. J. Crit. Infrastruct. 2011, 7(4):289-316.
34. Karlaftis M., Kepaptsoglou K., Lambropoulos S. Fund allocation for transportation network recovery following natural disasters. J. Urban Plann. Develop. 2007, 133(1):82-89.
35. Kuo W., Zhu X. Importance Measures in Reliability, Risk, and Optimization: Principles and Applications 2012, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
36. Kurauchi F., Uno N., Sumalee A., Seto Y. Network evaluation based on connectivity vulnerability. Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009: Golden Jubilee 2009, 637-649. Springer, New York, NY.
37. Lee T.-W., Park N.-K., Lee D.-W. A simulation study for the logistics planning of a container terminal in view of SCM. Maritime Pol. Manage. 2003, 30(3):243-254.
38. Lee B.K., Kim K.H. Optimizing the block size in container yards. Transp. Res. Part E 2010, 46(1):120-135.
39. Leemis L.M. Reliability: Probabilistic Models and Statistical Methods 2009, Lawrence Leemis, Williamsburg, VA. second ed.
40. MacKenzie C.A., Barker K., Grant F.H. Evaluating the consequences of an inland waterway port closure with a dynamic multiregional interdependency model. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybernet. Part A 2012, 42(2):359-370.
41. McDaniels T., Chang S., Cole D., Mikawoz J., Longstaff H. Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation. Global Environ. Change 2008, 18(2):310-318.
42. Modarres M., Kaminskiy M., Krivtsov V. Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis: A Practical Guide 2010, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. second ed.
43. Murray-Tuite P.M., Mahmassani H.S. Methodology for determining vulnerable links in a transportation network. Transp. Res. Rec. 2004, 1882:88-96.
44. Nagurney, A., Qiang, Q., 2007. A transportation network efficiency measure that captures flows, behavior, and costs with applications to network component importance identification and vulnerability. In: Proceedings of the POMS 18th Annual Conference, Dallas, TX.
45. Nagurney A., Qiang Q. An efficiency measure for dynamic networks with application to the internet and vulnerability analysis. Netnomics 2008, 9(1):1-20.
46. Natvig B., Huseby A.B., Reistadbakk M.O. Measures of component importance in repairable multistate systems: a numerical study. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96(12):1680-1690.
47. Ouyang M., Duenas-Osorio L., Min X. A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems. Struct. Saf. 2012, 36-37(1):23-31.
48. Pant R., Barker K., Grant F.H., Landers T.L. Interdependent impacts of inoperability at multi-modal transportation container terminals. Transp. Res. Part E 2011, 47(5):722-737.
49. Pant, R., Barker, K., 2012. Building dynamic resilience estimation metrics for interdependent infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, Helsinki, Finland.
50. Pant, R., Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Rocco, C.M., 2012. Stochastic measures of resilience of container terminals (submitted for publication).
51. Park J., Seager T.P., Rao P.S.C., Convertino M., Linkov I. Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Analysis 2013, 33(3):356-367.
52. Qiang Q., Nagurney A. A bi-criteria measure to assess supply chain network performance for critical needs under capacity and demand disruptions. Transp. Res. Part A 2012, 46(5):801-812.
53. Ramirez-Marquez J.E., Coit D.W. Composite importance measures for multi-state systems with multi-state components. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2005, 54(3):517-529.
54. Ramirez-Marquez J.E., Rocco C.M., Gebre B.A., Coit D.W., Tortorella M. New insights on multi-state component criticality and importance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2006, 91(8):894-904.
55. Ramirez-Marquez J.E., Rocco C.M. Vulnerability based robust protection strategy selection in service networks. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2012, 63(1):235-242.
56. Rocco C.M., Ramirez-Marquez J.E. Identification of top contributors of system vulnerability via an ordinal optimization based method. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2013, 114(1):92-98.
57. Rocco C.M., Ramirez-Marquez J.E. Innovative approaches for addressing old challenges in component importance measures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012, 108(1):123-130.
58. Rose A. Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environ. Hazards 2007, 7(4):383-398.
59. Rose A. Economic Resilience to Disasters: Community and Regional Resilience Institute (CARRI) Research Report 8 2009, CARRI Institute, Oakridge, TN.
60. Sacone S., Siri S. An integrated simulation-optimization framework for the operational planning of seaport container terminals. Math. Comput. Model. Dynam. Syst. 2009, 15(3):275-293.
61. Sanso B., Soumis F. Communication and transportation network reliability using routing models. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 1991, 40(1):29-38.
62. Smith J.C., Lim C., Sudargho F. Survivable network design under optimal and heuristic interdiction scenarios. J. Global Optim. 2007, 38(2):181-199.
63. Ta C., Goodchild A., Pitera K. Structuring a definition of resilience for the freight transportation system. Transp. Res. Rec. 2009, 2097:19-25.
64. Taylor M.A.P., Sekhar S.V.C., D'Este G.M. Application of accessibility based methods for vulnerability analysis of strategic road networks. Networks Spatial Econ. 2006, 6(3-4):267-291.
65. The Infrastructure Security Partnership, 2011. Regional Disaster Resilience Guide for Developing an Action Plan. Technical Report, American Society of Civil Engineers.
66. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009. Recovering from Disasters: The National Transportation Recovery Strategy.
67. Vasseur D., Llory M. International survey on PSA Figures of merit. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1999, 66(3):261-274.
68. Westmark, V., 2004. A definition for information system survivability. In: IEEE Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
69. Whitson J.C., Ramirez-Marquez J.E. Resiliency as a component importance measure in network reliability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94(10):1685-1693.
70. Yager R.R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybernet. 1988, 18(1):183-190.
71. Zeng A.Z., Durach C.F., Fang Y. Collaboration decisions on disruption recovery service in urban public tram systems. Transp. Res. Part E 2012, 48(3):578-590.
72. Zeng P., Peeta S. A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems. Transp. Res. Part B 2011, 45(3):553-579.
73. Zhang L., Levinson D. Investing for reliability and security in transportation networks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2008, 2041:1-10.
74. Zhang C., Ramirez-Marquez J.E., Rocco C.M. A new holistic method for reliability performance assessment and critical components detection in complex networks. IIE Trans. 2011, 43(9):661-675.
75. Zio E., Marella M., Podofillini L. Importance measures-based prioritization for improving the performance of multi-state systems: application to the railway industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2007, 92(10):1303-1314.
76. Zio E., Sansavini G., Maja R., Marchionni G. An analytical approach to the safety of road networks. Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng. 2008, 15(1):67-76.
77. Zobel C.W. Representing perceived tradeoffs in defining disaster resilience. Decis. Support Syst. 2011, 50(2):394-403.