Interdependent impacts of inoperability at multi-modal transportation container terminals

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 722-737

  Pant, Raghav ^a   Barker, Kash ^a   Grant, F Hank ^a   Landers, Thomas L ^a  

^a University of Oklahoma   (United States)

Author keywords

Disruptive events; Inland port; Inoperability Input Output Model; Interdependent impacts; Multi regional impacts

Indexed keywords

PLANT SHUTDOWNS; PORT TERMINALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ADVERSE EFFECT; COMMODITY FLOW; CONTAINER TERMINAL; DISRUPTIVE EVENT; INLAND PORT; INOPERABILITY INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL; INTERDEPENDENT IMPACT; MULTI-REGIONAL IMPACT; REGIONAL IMPACTS; RISK-BASED;

UNLOADING;

CONTAINER TERMINAL; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PORT OPERATION; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79955086116     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson C.W., Santos J.R., Haimes Y.Y. A risk-based input-output methodology for measuring the effects of the August 2003 Northeast blackout. Economic Systems Research 2007, 19(2):183-204.
2. Andrijcic E., Horowitz B. A macro-economic framework for evaluation of cyber security risks related to protection of intellectual property. Risk Analysis 2006, 26(4):907-923.
3. Bagheri, E., Ghorbani, A.A., 2007. Conceptualizing critical infrastructures as service oriented complex interdependent systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Management.
4. Barker K., Santos J.R. Measuring the efficacy of inventory with a dynamic input-output model. International Journal of Production Economics 2010, 126(1):130-143.
5. Barker K., Santos J.R. A risk-based approach for identifying key economic and infrastructure sectors. Risk Analysis 2010, 30(6):962-974.
6. Bureau of Economic Analysis, 2010. Interactive Access to Input-Output Accounts Data. http://www.bea.gov.in.
7. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2010. 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Overview and Methodology. http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity_flow_survey/index.html/.
8. Cohen J.P. The broader effects of transportation infrastructure: spatial econometrics and productivity approaches. Transportation Research Part E 2010, 46(3):317-326.
9. Crowther K.G., Haimes Y.Y. Development and deployment of the multiregional inoperability input-output model for strategic preparedness. Systems Engineering 2010, 13(1):28-46.
10. Department of Homeland Security, 2009. National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Partnering to Enhance Protection and Resiliency.
11. Ham H., Kim T.J., Boyce D. Assessment of economic impacts from unexpected events with an interregional commodity flow and multimodal transportation network model. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39(10):849-860.
12. Ham H., Kim T.J., Boyce D. Implementation and estimation of a combined model of interregional, multimodal commodity shipments and transportation network flows. Transportation Research Part B 2005, 39(1):65-79.
13. Henesey, L.E., 2006. Multi-Agent Systems for Container Terminal Management. PhD Thesis, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden.
14. Isard W., Azis I.J., Drennan M.P., Miller R.E., Saltzman S., Thorbecke E. Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis 1998, Ashgate, Brookfield, VT.
15. Ishfaq R., Sox C.R. Intermodal logistics: the interplay of financial, operational and service issues. Transportation Research Part E 2010, 46(6):926-949.
16. Lee B.K., Kim K.H. Optimizing the block size in container yards. Transportation Research Part E 2010, 46(1):120-135.
17. Lee E.E., Mitchell J.E., Wallace W.A. Restoration of services in interdependent infrastructure systems: a network flows approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C 2007, 37(6):1303-1317.
18. Lee T.-W., Park N.-K., Lee D.-W. A simulation study for the logistics planning of a container terminal in view of SCM. Maritime Policy and Management 2003, 30(3):243-254.
19. Leontief W.W. Input-Output Economics 1966, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
20. Miller R.E., Blair P.D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions 2009, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21. O'Reilly, G.P., Jrad, A., Brown, T., Conrad, S., 2006. Critical infrastructure analysis of telecom for natural disasters. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium.
22. Orsi M.J., Santos J.R. Estimating workforce-related economic impact of a pandemic on the Commonwealth of Virginia. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A 2010, 40(2):301-305.
23. Pritsker A.A.B., O'Reilly J.J. Simulation with Visual SLAM and AweSim 1999, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY.
24. Pederson P., Dudenhoeffer D., Hartley S., Permann M. Critical Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling: A Survey of US and International Research 2006, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID.
25. Prastacos P., Romanos M. A multiregional optimization model for allocating transportation investments. Transportation Research Part B 1987, 21(2):133-148.
26. Rietveld P. Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure supply. Transportation Research Part A 1994, 28(4):329-341.
27. Rinaldi S.M., Peerenboom J.P., Kelly T.K. Identifying, understanding and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazines 2001, 21(6):11-25.
28. Rodrigue J.-P., Debrie J., Fremont A., Gouvernal E. Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(4):519-529.
29. Rosato V., Issacharoff L., Tiriticco F., Meloni S., De Porcellinis S., Setola R. Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 2008, 4(1/2):63-79.
30. Sacone S., Siri S. An integrated simulation-optimization framework for the operational planning of seaport container terminals. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems 2009, 15(3):275-293.
31. Santos J.R. Inoperability input-output modeling of disruptions to interdependent economic systems. Systems Engineering 2006, 9(1):20-34.
32. Santos J.R., Barker K., Zelinke IV P.J. Sequential decision-making in interdependent sectors with multi-objective inoperability decision trees: application to biofuel subsidy analysis. Economic Systems Research 2008, 20(1):29-56.
33. Santos J.R., Haimes Y.Y. Modeling the demand reduction input-output (I-O) inoperability due to terrorism of interconnected infrastructures. Risk Analysis 2004, 24(6):1437-1451.
34. Simao H.P., Powell W.B. Numerical methods for simulating transient, stochastic queuing networks - I: methodology. Transportation Science 1992, 26(4):296-311.
35. Sohn J., Hewings G.J.D., Kim T.J., Lee J.S., Jang S.G. Analysis of economic impacts of an earthquake on transportation network. Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters 2004, 233-256. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Y. Okuyama, S.E. Chang (Eds.).
36. Tanaka, H., 2009. Quantitative analysis of information security interdependency between industrial sectors. In: ESEM, Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 574-583.
37. Tatano H., Tsuchiya S. A framework for economic loss estimation due to seismic transportation network disruption: a spatial computable general equilibrium approach. Natural Hazards 2008, 44(2):253-265.
38. Tulsa Port of Catoosa, 2010. Interactive Access to Website. http://www.tulsaport.com.
39. US Army Corps of Engineers, 2010. Interactive Access of Website. http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/ndc.
40. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, 2008. Meeting Environmental Requirements after Bridge Collapse. http://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/projdev/bridge_casestudy.asp#ok.
41. Wei H., Dong M., Sun S. Inoperability input-output modeling (IIM) of disruptions to supply chain networks. Systems Engineering 2010, 10.1002/sys.20153.
42. Wilson M.C. The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E 2007, 43(4):295-320.
43. Zhao Y., Kockelman K.M. The random-utility-based multiregional input-output model: solution existence and uniqueness. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38(9):789-807.
44. Zhu, S., Levison, D., Liu, H., Harder, K., 2009. The Traffic and Behavioral Effects of the I-35W Mississippi River Bridge Collapse. Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting.