Ranking using the copeland score: A comparison with the hasse diagram

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 785-791

  Al Sharrah, Ghanima ^a  

^a KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); SET THEORY;

COPELAND SCORE; HASSE DIAGRAMS; LINEAR EXTENSIONS; PARTIALLY ORDERED SET; RANKING METHODOLOGIES; SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FACTUAL DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 77952770072     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci100064q     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Davis, G.; Swanson, M.; Jones, S. Comparative evaluation of chemical ranking and sorting methodologies; University of Tennessee, Center for Clean Products and Clean Technologies: Knoxville, TN, 1994; http://isse.utk.edu/ccp/ pubs/pdfs/CECRSM.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2008.
2. Brans, J.; Vincke, Ph.; Mareschal, B. How to Select and how to Rank Projects: The PROMETHEE Method Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1986, 24, 228-238
3. Brüggemann, R.; Voigt, K. An Evaluation of Online Databases by Methods of Lattice Theory Chemosphere 1995, 31, 3585-3594
4. Voigt, K.; Gasteiger, J.; Brüggemann, R. Comparative Evaluation of Chemical and Environmantal Online and CD-ROM Databases J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 44-49
5. Halfon, E.; Galassi, S.; Brüggemann, R.; Provini, A. Selection of Priority Properties to Assess Environmental Hazard of Pesticides Chemosphere 1996, 33, 1543-1562
6. Brüggemann, R.; Halfon, E.; Welzl, G.; Voigt, K.; Steinberg, C. Applying the Concept of Partially Ordered Sets on the Ranking of Near-Shore Sediments by a Battery of Tests J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 918-925
7. Pavan, M.; Todeschini, R. New Indices for Analysing partial ranking Diagram Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 515, 167-181
8. Patil, G. P.; Taillie, C. Multiple Indicators, Partially Ordered Sets, and Linear Extensions: Multi-criterion Ranking and Prioritization Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2004, 11, 199-228
9. CMTI: Clean Manufacturing Technology Institute; Purdue University: West Laffayette, IN; www.ecn.purdue.edu/CMTI. Accessed June 20, 2009.
10. Swanson, M.; Davis, G.; Kincaid, L.; Schultz, T.; Bartmess, J.; Jones, S.; George, E. A Screening Method for Ranking and Scoring Chemicals by Potential Human Health and Environmental impact Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1997, 16, 372-383
11. Halfon, E.; Reggiani, M. On Ranking Chemicals for Environmental Hazard Environ. Sci. Technol. 1986, 20, 1173-1179
12. Ashby, J.; Doerrer, N.; Flamm, F.; Harris, J.; Hughes, D.; Johannsen, F.; Lewis, S.; Krivanek, N.; McCarthy, J.; Moolenaar, R.; Raabe, G.; Reynolds, R.; Smith, J.; Stevens, J.; Teta, M.; Wilson, J. A scheme for classifying carcinogens Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1990, 12, 270-295
13. Martel, J.; Matarazzo, B. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Survey; Figueira, J.; Greco, S.; Ehrgott, M., Ed.; Springer: New York, 2005; pp 197 - 260.
14. Opperhuizen, A.; Hutzinger, O. Multi-Criteria Analysis and Risk Assesment Chemoshpere 1982, 11, 675-678
15. Arrow, K. H.; Reynaud, H. Social choice and multicriterion decision-making; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1986.
16. Hasse, H. Vorlesung über Klassenkörper theories. Universität Marburg. Physical Verlag: Margurg, Germany, 1967.
17. Voigt, K.; Brüggemann, R. Influenec of Altitude Concening the Contamination of Humus Soils in the German Alps: a Data Evaluation Approach using PyHasse Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2010, 17, 429-440
18. DART, version 2.05; Talete srl: Milan, Italy; http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa. eu/qsar/qsar-tools/index.phpc=DART. Accessed April 11, 2010.
19. Brüggemann, R.; Voigt, K.; Steingerg, C. Application of Formal Concept Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Databases Chemosphere 1997, 35, 479-486
20. Lerche, D.; Brüggemann, R.; S rensen, P.; Carlsen, L.; Nielsen, O. A comparison of Partial Order Technique with Three Methods of Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ranking of Chemical Substances J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1086-1098
21. S rensen, P.; Mogensen, B.; Carlsen, L.; Thomsen, M. The Influence on Partial Order Ranking from Input Parameters Uncertainty Definition of a Robustness Parameter Chemosphere 2000, 41, 595-601
22. Lerche, D.; S rensen, P. B. Evaluation of the Ranking Probabilities for Partial Orders Based on Random Linear Extensions Chemosphere 2003, 53, 981-992
23. Bubley, R.; Dyer, M. Faster Random Generation of Linear Extensions Discrete Math. 1999, 201, 81-88
24. De Loof, K.; De Meyer, H.; De Baets, B. Exploiting the Lattice of Ideals Representation of a Poset Fund. Inform. 2006, 71, 309-321
25. De Loof, K.; De Baets, B.; De Meyer, H.; Brüggemann, R. A hitchhiker's guide to poset ranking Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2008, 11, 734-744
26. Brüggemann, R.; S rensen, P.; Lerche, D.; Carlson, L. Estimation of Average Ranks by a Local partial Order Model J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 618-625
27. Voigt, K.; Brüggemann, R. Ranking of Pharmaceuticals Detected in the Environment: Aggregation and Weighting Procedures Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2008, 11, 770-782
28. Copeland, A. A "reasonable" social welfare function. Mimeographed notes from a Seminar on Applications of Mathematics to the Social Sciences; University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, 1951.
29. Saari, D.; Merlin, V. The Copeland Method. I. Relationships and the Dictionary J. Econ. Theory 1996, 8, 51-76
30. Merlin, V.; Saari, D. Copeland Method. II. Manipulation, Monotonicity, and Paradoxes J. Econ. Theory 1997, 72, 148-172
31. Freitag, D.; Lay, J. P.; Korte, F. In QSAR in Environmental Toxicology; Kaiser, K. L. E., Ed.; Reidel Publishing: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1984; pp 111 - 136.
32. MATLAB, version 6.5; MathWorks Inc.: Natick, MA, 2002.
33. Supplemental Environmental Assessment Volume-2-in Waterworks Docking Area near West Shore Great Cataraqui River Utilities Crossing, Kingston, Ontario; INSPEC-SOL, Inc.: Kingston, Ontario, 2003; http://www.cityofkingston.ca/pdf/ environment/catriver/enviro-assess-vol2.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2010.
34. Babich, H.; Borenfreund, E. Structure-Activity Relationship for Diorganotins, Chlorinated Benzenes, and Chlorinated Anilines Established with Bluegill Sunfish BF-2 Cells Toxicol. Sci. 1988, 10, 295-301
35. Richter, J.; Peterson, S.; Kleiner, C. Acute and Chronic Toxicity of some Chlorinated Benzenes, Chlorinated Ethanes and Tetrachloroethyleen to Daphnia Magna Envir. Contam. Toxicol. 2005, 12, 679-684
36. Brüggemann, R.; Schwaiger, J.; Negele, R. Applying Hasse Diagram Technique for the Evaluation of Toxicological Fish Tests Chemosphere 1995, 30, 1767-1780