A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 553-579

  Zhang, Pengcheng ^a   Peeta, Srinivas ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computable general equilibrium; Decision making; Generalized transportation network; Infrastructure systems interdependencies

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; DECISION MAKING; MULTILAYERS;

CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; DESIGN AND OPERATIONS; INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORKS; INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK;

NETWORK FUNCTION VIRTUALIZATION;

COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; DESIGN; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING; NETWORK ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; URBANIZATION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951518014     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bhattacharyya S.C. Applied general equilibrium models for energy studies: a survey. Energy Economics 1996, 18(3):145-164.
2. Brocker J. Chamberlinian spatial computable general equilibrium modelling: a theoretical framework. Economic Systems Research 1995, 7(2):137-150.
3. Brown T., Beyeler W., Barton D. Assessing infrastructure interdependencies: the challenge of risk analysis for complex adaptive systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 2004, 1(1):108-117.
4. Bush, B., Dauelsberg, L., LeClaire, R., Powell, D., DeLand, S., Samsa, M., 2005. Critical infrastructure protection decision support system project overview. Technical Report LA-UR-05-1870. Los Alamos National Laboratory.
5. Caspersen, S., Eriksen, L., Larsen, M.M., 2000. The BROBISSE model - a spatial general equilibrium model to evaluate the Great Belt Link in Denmark. Technical Report. AFK Forlaget, Institute of Local Government Studies.
6. Conrad K. Traffic, transportation, infrastructure and externalities: a theoretical framework for a CGE analysis. The Annals of Regional Science 1997, 31(4):369-389.
7. Conrad K., Heng S. Financing road infrastructure by savings in congestion costs: a CGE analysis. The Annals of Regional Science 2002, 36(1):107-122.
8. Dudenhoeffer, D., Permann, M., Manic, M., 2006. CIMS: a framework for infrastructure interdependency modeling and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, Monterey, CA, pp. 478-485.
9. Duenas-Osorio, L., Craig, J., Goodno, B., 2004. Probabilistic response of interdependent infrastructure networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Asian-Pacific Network of Centers for Earthquake Engineering Research (ANCER), Honolulu, Hawaii.
10. Duenas-Osorio L., Craig J., Goodno B. Seismic response of critical interdependent networks. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007, 36(2):285-306.
11. Duenas-Osorio L., Craig J., Goodno B., Bostrom A. Interdependent response of networked systems. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2007, 13(3):185-194.
12. Fonseca, G. L., 2001. Neoclassical Theories of Production. The New School for Social Research. (accessed 03.03.10). http://www.cepa.newschool.edu/het/essays/product/prodcont.htm.
13. Friesz, T.L., Peeta, S., Bernstein, D.H., 2001. Multi-layer infrastructure networks and capital budgeting. Working Paper TF0801A. George Mason University and Purdue University.
14. Giesecke J.A., Madden J.R. A large-scale dynamic multi-regional CGE model with an illustrative application. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies 2003, 15(1):2-25.
15. Ginsburgh V., Keyzer M. The Structure of Applied General Equilibrium Models 2002, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Goulder, L.H., 1982. A general equilibrium analysis of US energy policies. Ph.D. thesis. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
17. Haimes Y.Y., Jiang P. Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2001, 7(1):1-12.
18. Haimes Y.Y., Horowitz B.M., Lambert J.H., Santos J.R., Crowther K.G., Lian C. Inoperability input-output model for interdependent infrastructure sectors. II: Case studies. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2005, 11(2):80-92.
19. Haimes Y.Y., Horowitz B.M., Lambert J.H., Santos J.R., Lian C., Crowther K.G. Inoperability input-output model for interdependent infrastructure sectors. I: Theory and methodology. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2005, 11(2):67-79.
20. Horridge M. A computable general equilibrium model of urban transport demands. Journal of Policy Modeling 1994, 16(4):427-457.
21. Ivanova, O., Vold, A., Jean-Hansen, V., 2002. PINGO: a model for prediction of regional and interregional freight transport. Technical Report 578/2002. Institute of Transport Economics, University of Oslo, Norway.
22. Jeong H., Qiao J., Abraham D., Lawley M., Richard J.P., Yih Y. Minimizing the consequences of intentional attack on water infrastructure. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2006, 21(2):79-92.
23. Jiang P., Haimes Y.Y. Risk management for Leontief-based interdependent systems. Risk Analysis 2004, 24(5):1215-1229.
24. Jorgenson D.W., Wilcoxen P.J. Energy prices, productivity, and economic growth. Annual Review of Energy and Environment 1993, 18:343-395.
25. Kim E., Hewings G., Hong C. An application of an integrated transport network - multiregional CGE model: a framework for the economic analysis of highway projects. Economic Systems Research 2004, 16(3):235-258.
26. Lofgren H., Robinson S. Spatial-network, general-equilibrium model with a stylized application. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2002, 32(5):651-671.
27. Macal, C.M., North, M.J., 2002. Simulating energy markets and infrastructure interdependencies with agent based models. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Social Agents: Ecology, Exchange and Evolution, Chicago, IL, pp. 195-214.
28. Masera, M., Wilkens, M., 2001. Interdependencies with the information infrastructure: dependability and complexity issues. In: The Fifth International Conference on Technology, Policy and Innovation, Netherlands.
29. McFadden D. Constant elasticity of substitution production functions. Review of Economic Studies 1963, 30(2):73-83.
30. McFarland J.R., Reilly J.M., Herzog H.J. Representing energy technologies in top-down economic models using bottom-up information. Energy Economics 2004, 26(4):685-707.
31. Nagurney A., Dong J. Supernetworks: Decision-making for the Information Age 2002, Edward Edgar Publishing, Cheltenham, England.
32. National Petroleum Council, 2001. Securing oil and natural gas infrastructures in the new economy. Technical Report 2001091810. Library of Congress, Washington, DC.
33. North M.J. Multi-agent social and organizational modeling of electric power and natural gas markets. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 2001, 7(4):331-337.
34. Nozick L.K., Turnquist M.A., Jones D.A., Davis J.R., Lawton C.R. Assessing the performance of interdependent infrastructures and optimizing investments. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 2005, 1(2/3):144-154.
35. Oosterhaven, J., Knaap, T., 2003. Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure investments. Transport Projects, Programs and Policies: Evaluation Needs and Capabilities, Chap. 5. Ashgate, Hampshire, UK.
36. Pederson, P., Dudenhoeffer, D., Hartley, S., Permann, M., 2006. Critical infrastructure interdependency modeling: a survey of US and international research. Technical Report INL/EXT-06-11464. Idaho National Laboratory.
37. PROVIDE, 2005. A computable general equilibrium (CGE) analysis of the impact of an oil price increase in South Africa. Working Paper. The National and Provincial Departments of Agriculture, South Africa.
38. Qiao J., Jeong D., Lawley M., Richard J.P., Abraham D., Yih Y. Allocating security resources to a water supply network. IIE Transactions, Special Issue on Homeland Security 2007, 39(1):95-109.
39. Rose A., Liao S. Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: a computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. Journal of Regional Science 2005, 45(1):75-112.
40. Rutherford T. Applied general equilibrium modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS subsystem: an overview of the modeling framework and syntax. Computational Economics 1999, 14(1-2):1-46.
41. Sands, R.D., Schumacher, K., 2003. Advanced electric generating technologies in a CGE model of Germany. In: Proceedings of International Energy Workshop, Laxenburg, Austria.
42. Santos J.R., Haimes Y.Y. Modeling the demand reduction input-output (I-O) inoperability due to terrorism of interconnected infrastructures. Risk Analysis 2004, 24(6):1437-1451.
43. Seung C., Harris T., Englin J., Netusil N. Impacts of water reallocation: a combined computable general equilibrium and recreation demand model approach. Annals of Regional Science 2000, 34(4):473-487.
44. Shoven J.B., Whalley J. Applying General Equilibrium 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
45. The White House, 2003. National strategy for the physical protection of critical infrastructure and key assets. (accessed 03.03.10). http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/publications/publication_0017.shtm.
46. Thomas W.H., North M.J., Macal C.M., Peerenboom J.P. Complex adaptive systems representation of infrastructure interdependencies 2003, Naval Surface Warfare Center Technical Digest, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA, pp. 58-67.
47. Tiwari P., Doi M., Itoh H. A CGE analysis of the potential impact of information technology on the Japanese economy. Journal of Policy Reform 2003, 6(1):17-33.
48. Tolone, W.J., Wilson, D., Raja, A., Xiang, W.N., Hao, H., Phelps, S., Johnson, E.W., 2004. Critical infrastructure integration modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science #3073, pp. 214-225.
49. Wing, I.S., 2004. Computable general equilibrium models and their use in economy-wide policy analysis. Technical Report DF-FG02-02ER63484. Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
50. Zhang, P., Peeta, S., 2010. Implementation and computation issues in interdependent infrastructure systems analysis. Working Paper. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
51. Zhang, P., Peeta, S., 2011. Dynamic analysis of interdependent infrastructure systems. In: Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (CD-ROM).
52. Zhang P., Peeta S., Friesz T.L. Dynamic game theoretic model of multi-layer infrastructure networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 2005, 5(2):147-178.