Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Socio-Economic Systems: a systematic review

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 661-674

  Tamošaitiene, Jolanta ^a   Kapliński, Oleg ^b  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Decision Making; MCDM; processes; Socio Economic; Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA); strategy; system

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890945343     PISSN: 20294913     EISSN: 20294921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2013.862882     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ahmed, K.; Sanchez-Triana, E. (Eds.). 2008. Strategic environmental assessment for policies. Washington, DC: World Bank. 222 p.
2. Abbasianjahromi, H.; Rajaie, H. 2012. Developing a project portfolio selection model for contractor firms considering the risk factor, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(6): 879-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.734856.
3. Bozejko, W.; Hejducki, Z.; Wodecki, M. 2012. Applying metaheuristic strategies in construction projects management, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(5): 621-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.719837.
4. Brown, L.; Thérivel, R. 2000. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 18(3): 183-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767385.
5. Brauers, W. K. M.; Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2010. Regional development in Lithuania considering multiple objectives by the MOORA method, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(4): 613-640. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.38.
6. Dalal-Clayton, B.; Sadler, B. (Eds.). 2005. Strategic environmental assessment: a sourcebook and reference guide to international experience. London: Earthscan. 504 p.
7. Fischer, T. B. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23(2): 155-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00094-X.
8. Fischer, T. B. 2007. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: London: Earthscan.
9. Gachechiladze-Bozheskua, M.; Fischer, T. B. 2012. Benefits of and barriers to SEA follow-up - theory and practice, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 34: 22-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.11.006.
10. Geneletti, D. 2013. Ecosystem services in environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment, Environmental impact assessment review, Special Issue on Ecosystem Services in EIA and SEA (SI) 40: 1-2.
11. Gibson, R. B. 2006. Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 8(3): 259-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002517.
12. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2003b. Quantitative evaluation of the significance of hierarchically structured indices, Business: Theory and Practice 3(3): 111-116.
13. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2003a. Quantitative evaluation of the significance of hierarchically structured indexes, in International Conference on Modelling and Simulation of Business System, May 13-14, 2003, Vilnius, Lithuania, 22-25.
14. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2004a. Quantitative evaluation of the strategic potential of enterprises, Business: Theory and Practice 4(1): 3-9.
15. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2004b. Hierarchical structuring of elements based on their transitivity, Business: Theory and Practice 4(3): 85-89.
16. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2005. Generation of a set of evaluation criteria, Business: Theory and Practice 6(4): 199-207.
17. Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2007. Complex assessment of sustainable development of the state regions with emphasis on ecological and dwelling conditions, Ekologija 53: 41-48.
18. Ginevičius, R.; Butkevičius, A.; Podvezko, V. 2006. Complex evaluation of economic development of the Baltic States and Poland, Ekonomický časopis 54(9): 918-930.
19. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Andruškevičius, A. 2007. Quantitative evaluation of building technology, International Journal of Technology Management 40(1/2/3): 192-214.
20. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008a. Multicriteria graphical-analytical evaluation of the financial state of construction enterprises, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(4): 452-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.452-461.
21. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008b. Housing in the context of economic and social development of Lithuanian regions, International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP) 35(2/3/4): 309-330.
22. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008c. Multicriteria evaluation of Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(4): 257-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.257-267.
23. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Bruzgė, Š. 2008a. Evaluating the effect of state aid to business by multicriteria methods, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(3): 167-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.167-180.
24. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Raslanas, S. 2008b. Evaluating the alternative solutions of wall insulation by multicriteria methods, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(4): 217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.20.
25. Ginevicius, R.; Gineviciene, V.; Podvezko, V. 2008c. The effectiveness of enterprise marketing system, in International Conference on Marketing and Management Sciences (ICMMS), May, 2008, Athens, Greece, 31-32.
26. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2009. Evaluating the changes in economic and social development of Lithuanian counties by multiple criteria methods, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 15(3): 418-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.418-436.
27. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Novotny, M.; Komka, A. 2012. Comprehensive quantitative evaluation of the strategic potential of an enterprise, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research 46(1): 65-84.
28. Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Ginevičius, A. 2013. Quantitative evaluation of enterprise marketing activities, Journal of Business Economics and Management 14(1): 200-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.731143.
29. Hilding-Rydevik, T.; Bjarnadóttir, H. 2007. Context awareness and sensitivity in SEA implementation, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27(7): 666-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.009.
30. Kaklauskas, A.; Kelpšienė, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Bardauskienė, D.; Kaklauskas, G.; Urbonas, M.; Sorakas, V. 2011. Crisis management in construction and real estate: conceptual modeling at the micro-, meso-and macro-levels, Land Use Policy 28(1): 280-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.008.
31. Kapliński, O. 2010. Review of trans-border co-operation in construction management between Lithuania, Germany and Poland, Evolution of Science and Technology 2(1): 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/est.2010.22.
32. Kapliński, O.; Peldschus, F. 2011. The problems of quantitative evaluation of socio-economic system development: review, Inzinerine Ekonomika - Enginering Economics 22(4): 345-355.
33. Ke, Y.; Wang, S. Q.; Chan, A. P. C. 2012. Risk management practice in China's public-private partnership projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(5): 675-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.723380.
34. Kornov, L.; Thissen, W. 2000. Rationality in decision and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 18(3): 191-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767402.
35. Lee, N.; Walsh, F. 1992. Strategic environmental assessment: an overview, Project Appraisal 7(3): 126-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1992.9726853.
36. Marsden, S. 2008. Strategic environmental assessment in international and European law. London: Earthscan. 330 p.
37. Marzuki, P. F.; Permadi, H.; Sunaryo, I. 2012. Factors affecting job satisfaction of workers in Indonesian construction companies, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(3): 299-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.698889.
38. Maskeliunaitė, L.; Sivilevičius, H.; Podvezko, V. 2009. Research on the quality of passenger transportation by railway, Transport 24(2): 100-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.100-112.
39. Morgan, R. K. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 30(1): 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.
40. Nilsson, M.; Dalkmann, H. 2001. Decision making and strategic environmental assessment, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 3(3): 305-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333201000728.
41. Nitz, T.; Brown, L. 2001. SEA must learn how policy making works, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 3(3): 329-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S146433320100073X.
42. Noble, B.; Storey, K. 2001. Towards a structured approach to strategic environmental assessment, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 3(4): 483-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1464333201000832.
43. Noble, B. F. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: what is it and what makes it strategic?, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 2(2): 203-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S146433320000014X.
44. Partidario, M. R. 1996. Strategic environmental assessment: key issues emerging from recent practice, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16(1): 31-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(95)00106-9.
45. Partidario, M. R. 2000. Elements of an SEA framework: improving the added-value of SEA, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20(6): 647-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00069-X.
46. Partidario, M. R. 2007. Scales and associated data: what is enough for SEA needs?, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27(5): 460-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.004.
47. Partidario, M. R.; Arts, J. 2005. Exploring the concept of strategic environmental assessment follow-up, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 23(3): 246-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765481.
48. Podvezko, V. 1984. Design and analysis of complex probabilistic models of prediction: Disertation [Postroenie i analiz kompleksa modeley veroiatnostnogo prognozirovaniia] (in Russian).
49. Podvezko, V. 2006. Complex evaluation of social and economic processes: Habilitation: Vilnius: Technika.
50. Podvezko, V. 2009. Application of AHP technique, Journal of Business Economics and Management 10(2): 181-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.181-189.
51. Podvezko, V. 2011. The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS, Inzinerine Ekonomika - Engineering Economics 2(22): 134-146.
52. Podvezko, V.; Podviezko, A. 2010. Dependence of multi-criteria evaluation result on choice of preference functions and their parameters, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(1): 143-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.09.
53. Podvezko, V.; Mitkus, S.; Trinkuniene, E. 2010. Complex evaluation of contracts for construction, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 16(2): 287-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2010.33.
54. Ramirez, F.; Seco, A. 2012. Civil engineering at the crossroads in the twenty-first century, Science and Engineering Ethics 18(4): 681-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9258-2.
55. Ren, Y.; Skibniewski, M. J.; Jiang, S. 2012. Building information modeling integrated with electronic commerce material procurement and supplier performance management system, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(5): 642-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.719835.
56. Schiederig, T.; Tietze, F.; Herstatt, C. 2012. Green innovation in technology and innovation management - an exploratory literature review, R&D Management 42(2): 180-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00672.x.
57. Sheate, W. R.; Dagg, S.; Richardson, J.; Aschemann, R.; Palerm, J.; Steen, U. 2003. Integrating the environment into strategic decision-making: conceptualizing policy SEA, European Environment 13(1): 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.305.
58. Sivilevičius, H.; Podvezko, V.; Vakrinienė, S. 2011. The use of constrained and unconstrained optimization models in gradation design of hot mix asphalt mixture, Construction and Building Materials 25(1): 115-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.050.
59. Stoeglehner, G.; Brown, L.; Kornov, L. 2009. SEA and planning: ownership of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 27(2): 111-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/146155109X438742.
60. Tamošaitienė, J.; Bartkienė, L.; Vilutienė, T. 2010. The new development trend of operational research in civil engineering and sustainable development as a result of collaboration between German-Lithuanian-Polish scientific triangle, Journal of Business Economics and Management 11(2): 316-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.16.
61. Urbanavičienė, V.; Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Seniut, M. 2009. The web-based real estate multiple criteria negotiation decision support system: a new generation of decision support systems, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 13(3): 267-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1648-715X.2009.13.267-286.
62. Ustinovičius, L.; Podvezko, V.; Ginevičius, R. 2006. A method of determining risk zones of investment in real estate, Control and Cybernetics 35(2): 471-486.
63. Ustinovičius, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Podvezko, V. 2007. Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction, Control and Cybernetics 36(1): 251-268.
64. Verheem, R.; Tonk, J. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: one concept, multiple forms, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 19(3): 177-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767411.
65. Vicente, G.; Partidaacuterio, M. R. 2006. SEA: enhancing communication for better environmental decisions, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26(8): 696-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.06.005.
66. Yang, L.-R.; Chen, J.-H.; Wang, H.-W. 2012. Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice, Automation in Construction 22: 182-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.016.
67. Zavadskas, E. K.; Ginevičius, R.; Tamošaitienė, J.; Banaitis, A. 2013. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods in civil engineering: overview and trends, Bauprozessmanagement und Immobilienentwicklung: Schriftenreihe des Lehrstuhl für Bauprozessmanagement und Immobilienentwicklung. Band. 33 Munchen: Technische Universitat Munchen. (Lehrstuhl fur Bauprozessmanagement und Immobilienentwicklung, Band 33): 1-10.
68. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 2007. Mehrzielselektion für Entscheidungen im Bauwesen: Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
69. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamošaitienė, J. 2009. Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers, Informatica 20(2): 305-320 [online], [cited 17 April 2013]. Vilnius: Matematikos ir informatikos institutas. ISSN 0868-4952. Available from Internet: http://www.mii.lt/informatica/pdf/INFO750.pdf
70. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J.; Kalibatas, D. 2011b. Assessment of the indoor environment of dwelling houses by applying the COPRAS-G method: Lithuania case study, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 10(5): 637-647.
71. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z. 2011. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(2): 397-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
72. Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J. 2011a. Selection of construction enterprises management strategy based on the SWOT and multi-criteria analysis, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 11(4): 1063-1082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60096-X.
73. Zhang, Y.; Ng, S. T. 2012. An ant colony system based decision support system for construction time-cost optimization, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 18(4): 580-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.704164.