Multicriteria evaluation of Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients

Journal of Business Economics and Management

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 257-267

  Ginevičius, Romualdas ^a   Podvezko, Valentinas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Bank reliability; Multicriteria evaluation methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350675630     PISSN: 16111699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.257-267     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Figueira, J.; Greco, S.; Ehrgott, M. 2005. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Survey. Springer.
2. Gineviĉius, R. 2006. Multicriteria evaluation of the criteria weights by multicriteria methods based on their interrelationships, Business: Theory and Practice 7(1): 3-13.
3. Gineviĉius, R. 2008. Normalization of quantities of various dimensions, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(1): 79-86.
4. Gineviĉius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2004. Complex evaluation of the use of information technologies in the Countries of Eastern and Central Europe, Journal of Business Economics and Management 5(4): 183-191.
5. Gineviĉius, R ; Podvezko, V. 2006. Assessing the Financial state of construction enterprises, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(3): 188-194.
6. Gineviĉius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2007a. Some problems of evaluating multicriteria decision methods, International Journal of Management and Decision Making 8 (5/6): 527-539.
7. Gineviĉius, R ; Podvezko, V. 2007b. Complex assessment of sustainable development of state regions with emphasis on ecological and dwelling conditions, Ekologija 53: 41-48.
8. Gineviĉius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008a. The problem of compatibility of various multiple criteria evaluation methods, Business: Theory and Practice 9(1): 73-80.
9. Gineviĉius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008b. A feasibility study of multicriteria methods' application to quantitative evaluation of social phenomena, Business: Theory and Practice 9(2): 81-87.
10. Gineviĉius, R.; Butkcviĉius, A.; Podvezko, V. 2006. Complex evaluation of economic development of the Baltic states and Poland, Ekonomický Ĉasopis [Journal of Economics] 54(9): 918-930.
11. Gineviĉius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Bruzgė, Ŝ, 2008. Evaluating the effect of state aid to business by multicriteria methods, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(3): 167-180.
12. Hwang, C.L.;. Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Jasienė, M.; Ĉapskas, G. 2008. Rate of interest and the investigation of the essential influencing factors in Lithuania in 1994-2006, Business: Theory and Practice 9(1): 45-50.
14. Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Banaitis, A.; Ŝatkauskas, G. 2007. Defining the utility and market value of real estate by a multiple criteria approach, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 11(2): 107-120.
15. Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Raslanas, S.; Gineviĉius, R.; Komka, A.; Malinauskas, P. 2006. Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying multiple criteria method COPRAS: A Lithuanian case, Energy and Buildings 38: 454-462.
16. Kendal, M. 1970. Rank correlation methods. London: Griffin.
17. Kuĉinskaitė, J.; Putelytė, G. 2007. Which bank is the best? Veidas 47: 18-21.
18. Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156: 445-455.
19. Podvezko, V. 2006. Multicriteria evaluation under uncertainty, Business: Theory and Practice 7(2): 81-88.
20. Podvezko, V. 2007. Determining the level of agreement of expert estimates, International Journal of Management and Decision Making 8(5/6): 586-600.
21. Putelytë, G. 2004. Indëliai nebepasiveja paskolu̧, Veidas 35:16-17.
22. Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: M. Graw-Hill.
23. Saaty, T. L. 2005. The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making, in Figueira, J.; Greco, S.; Ehrgott,
24. M. (eds.). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Survey. Springer, 9: 345-408.
25. Shevchenko, G.; Ustinovichius, L.; Andruŝkeviĉius, A. 2008. Multi-attribute analysis of investments risk alternatives in construction, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(3): 428-443.
26. Su, Ch.W.; Cheng, M.Y.; Lin, F.B. 2006. Simulation-enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 12(4): 285-291.
27. Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Zagorskas, J. 2006. Sustainable city compactness evaluation on the basis of GIS and Bayes rule, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 10 (3): 185-207.
28. Ustinovichius, L.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2004. Determining the effectiveness of construction investments by multicriteria methods. Vilnius: Technika.
29. Ustinovichius, L.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Podvezko, V. 2007. Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction, Control and Cybernetics 35(2): 251-268.
30. Viteikienė, M. 2006. Sustainable residential areas evaluation, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(2): 152-160.
31. Viteikiene, M; Zavadskas, E. K. 2007. Evaluating the sustainability of Vilnius city residential areas, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 13(2): 149-155.
32. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A. 2007. Mehrzielselektion für Entscheidungen im Bauwesen, [Multi-attribute Decisions in Construction], Fraunhofer IRB Verlag (In German).
33. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Peldschus, F.; Turskis, Z. 2007. Multi-attribute assessment of road design solution by using the COPRAS method, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 2(4): 195-203.
34. Zavadskas, E. K.; Zakarevicius, A.; Antucheviciene, J. 2006. Evaluation of Ranking Accuracy in Multi-Criteria Decisions, Informatica 17(4): 601-618.
35. Zavadskas, E. K.; Antucheviciene, J. 2007. Multiple criteria evaluation of rural buildings' regeneration alternatives, Building and Environment 42(1): 436-451.