Analysing large datasets of eye movements during reading

Visual Word Recognition Volume 2: Meaning and Context, Individuals and Development

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 102-130

  Heister, Julian ^a   Würzner, Kay Michael ^a   Kliegl, Reinhold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890897721     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203106976     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity not word frequency determines word naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814-823.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
4. Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
5. Bates, D. M. & Maechler, M., (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-33.
6. Binder, K. S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1162-1172.
7. Beauvillain, C. (1996). The integration of morphological and whole-word form information during eye fixations on prefixed and suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 801-820.
8. Boston, M. F., Hale, J., Kliegl, R., Patil, U. & Vasishth, S. (2008). Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1-12.
9. Brysbaert, M. & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. D. M. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 125-147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Brysbaert, M., Drieghe, D., & Vitu, F. (2005). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. D. M. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 53-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Brysbaert, M. & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kuc?era and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977-990.
12. Ehrlich, S. F. & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 641-655.
13. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005) SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777-813.
14. Faraway, J. J. (2007). Changes to the mixed effects models chapter in ELM. Available at: http://www.maths.bath.ac.uk/~jjf23/ELM
15. Gelman, A. & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Graf, R., Nagler, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Factor analysis of 57 variables in visual word recognition. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213, 205-218.
17. Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). dlexDB-eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung [dlexDB-a lexical database for psychological and linguistic research]. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 10-20.
18. Henderson, J. M. & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 417-429.
19. Heller, D. & Müller, H. (1983). On the relationship of saccade size and fixation duration in reading. In R. Groner, C. Menz, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds), Eye movements and psychological functions: international views (pp. 287-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Hogaboam, T. W. (1982). Reading patterns in eye movement data. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 309-332). New York: Academic Press.
21. Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., Starr, M., & Greenberg, S. (2000). Allocation of visuo-spatial attention and saccade programming during reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 221-246). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Just, M. A. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
23. Kennedy, A. & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153-168.
24. Kennedy, A., Pynte, J., & Ducrot, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, Section A, 55A, 1307-1337.
25. Kliegl, R. (2007). Towards a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, & Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 530-537.
26. Kliegl, R. & Engbert, R. (2005). Fixation durations before word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 132-138.
27. Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 262-284.
28. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12-35.
29. Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Engbert, R. (2008). Reading strategies and their implementation in the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 190. [ Abstract ].
30. Kliegl, R., Masson, M. E. J., & Richter, E. M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18, 655-681.
31. Krügel, A. & Engbert, R. (2010). On the launch-site effect for skipped words during reading. Vision Research, 50, 1532-1539.
32. Lorch, R. & Myers, J. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research: A comparison of three different methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.
33. McConkie, G. W. & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus in during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
34. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245-53.
35. McConkie, G. G., Kerr, P. W., and Dyre, B. P. (1994). What are 'normal' eye movements during reading: Toward a mathematical description. In J. Ygge and G. Lennestrand (Eds.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 315-27). Oxford: Elsevier.
36. Murray, W. S. & Forster, K. I. (2004). Serial mechanisms in lexical access: The rank hypothesis. Psychological Review, 111, 721-756.
37. Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201-2217.
38. Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2007). The IOVP-effect in mindless reading: Experiment and modeling. Vision Research, 47, 990-1002.
39. O' Regan, J. K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 501-509.
40. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 123-130.
41. Pynte, J. & Kennedy, A. (2006). An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French. Vision Research, 46, 3786-3801.
42. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Ducrot, S. (2004). The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 178-202.
43. Quené, H. & van den Bergh, H. (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413-425.
44. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (version 2.11.1). [Software].
45. Radach, R. & Heller, D. (2000). Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 165-191). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
46. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
47. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
48. Rayner, K. (2009). The Thirty Fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
49. Rayner, K. & Bertera, J. H. (Oct 26, 1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468-469.
50. Rayner, K. & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201.
51. Rayner, K. & Juhasz B. J. (2004). Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 340-352.
52. Rayner, K. & McConkie, G. W. (1976) What guides a reader's eye movements. Vision Research, 16, 829-837.
53. Rayner, K. & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504-509.
54. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200.
55. Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41, 943-954.
56. Rayner, K., White, S., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research, (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
57. Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720-732.
58. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Brown, S. J. (2007). Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 230-245.
59. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
60. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement control during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22.
61. Richter, E., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2006) Current advances in SWIFT. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 23-33.
62. Risse, S., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Eye-movement control in reading: Experimental and corpus-analytic challenges for a computational model. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai, & G. Yan (Eds) Cognitive and cultural influences on eye movements. (pp. 65-92). Tianjin: Tianjin People's Publishing House/Psychology Press.
63. Starr, M. S. & Inhoff, A. W. (2004). Attention allocation to the right and left of a fixated word: Use of orthographic information from multiple words during reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 203-225.
64. Starr, M. S. & Rayner, K. (2001). Eye movements during reading: Some current controversies. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 156-163.
65. Underwood, N. R. & McConkie, G. W. (1985). Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 153-162.
66. Underwood, G., Binns, A., & Walker, S. (2000). Attentional demands on the processing of neighbouring words. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 247-268). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
67. Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K. Inhoff, A., & Topolski, R. (1995). Mindless reading: Eye Movement characteristics are similar in scanning strings and reading texts. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 352-64.
68. Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P., & O'Regan, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513-3533.
69. White, S. J. (2008). Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 205-223.
70. White, S. J. & Liversedge, S. P. (2004) Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 52-78.