Factor analysis of 57 variables in visual word recognition;Faktorenanalyse von 57 Variablen der visuellen Worterkennung

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie

Volumn 213, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 205-218

  Graf, Ralf ^a   Nagler, Markus ^a   Jacobs, Arthur M ^b  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF EICHSTÄTT INGOLSTADT   (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Factor analysis; Lexical decision task; Naming task; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144475360     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0044-3409.213.4.205     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & van Rijn, H.(1993). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Balota, D. A. & Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 32-55.
4. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
5. Bouwhuis, D. & Bouma, H. (1979). Visual word recognition of three-letter words as derived from the recognition of the constituent letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 12-22.
6. Carreiras, M., Perea, M. & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 857-871.
7. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
8. Conrad, M. & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish and German: A challenge to current models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 369-390.
9. Cree, G. S. & MacRrae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163-201.
10. Danion, J.-M., Kauffmann-Muller, F., Grangé, D., Zimmermann, M.-A. & Greth, P. (1995). Affective valence of words, expiclit and implicit memory in clinical depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 34, 227-234.
11. Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual Agnosia: Disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normal vision. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Farah, M. J. (1991). Patterns of co-occurence among the associative agnosias: Implications for visual object recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 1-20.
13. Farah, M. J. (2000). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Vision. (Fundamentals of cognitive neuroscience [book 3]). London: Blackwell.
14. Forster, K. I. & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 627-635.
15. Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228-244.
16. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 516-565.
17. Grainger, J., O'Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M. & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
18. Hutzler, F., Conrad, M. & Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye movement study. Brain and Language. 92 (2), 138-152.
19. Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, B., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P. & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 372 (3), 179-184.
20. Imae, K. (1966). A factor analytical study of Japanese verbal materials. Psychologia, 9, 91-94.
21. Jacobs, A. M. & Graf, R. (im Druck). Wortformgedächtnis als statistische Inferenz in Sprachen mit unterschiedlicher Konsistenz. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.
22. Jacobs, A. M. & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semi-stochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
23. Jacobs, A. M. & Grainger, J. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 6, 1311-1334.
24. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C. & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-p: an interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition (pp. 147-188), Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound-consistency affects naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
26. Jared, D., McRae, K. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
27. Klix, F. (1992). Die Natur des Verstandes. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
28. Krumhansl, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445-463.
29. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
30. McCandliss, B.D., Cohen, L. & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyms. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 293-299.
31. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
32. Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Nagler, M. (2003). Individual subjects' response time distributions and dynamics in visual word recognition. Diploma Thesis. Lehrstuhl Psychologie II. KU Eichstätt-Ingolstadt.
34. Peereman, R. & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming words and pseudowords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21, 409-421.
35. Peereman, R. & Content, A. (1997). Orthographic and phonological neighborhoods in naming: Not all neighbors are equally influential in orthographic space. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 382-410.
36. Pierce, J. R. (1980). An introduction to information theory; symbols, signals and noise. New York: Dover.
37. Price, C. J. (2004). The pros and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: "the visual word form area". Neuroimage, 22, 477-479.
38. Rastle, K. & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammy and double whammy: length effects in nonword naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277-282.
39. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L. & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494.
40. Rubenstein H., Lewis S. S. & Rubenstein M. A. (1971). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 75-62.
41. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
42. Sears, C. R., Hino, Y. & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 876-900.
43. Stenneken, P., Bastiaanse, R., Huber, W. & Jacobs, A. M. (in press). Syllable structure and sonority in language inventory and aphasic neologisms. Brain and Language.
44. Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., Goldenberg, G. & Jacobs, A. (2003). Visual processing of sublexical units in dyslexia. Brain and Language, 87, 137-138.
45. Stone, G. O., VanHoy, M. & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
46. Thiel, A. & Nürk, H. C. (1999). Further investigation of the role of subcomponent frequency in the lexical decision task. Unpublished Coursepaper. Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Psychologie. Philipps Universität Marburg.
47. Treiman, R., Mullenix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R. & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
48. Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G. & Turvey, M. T. (2003). Self-organization of cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 331-350.
49. Windmann, S., Daum, I. & Güntürkün, O. (2002). Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: effects of the stimulus presentation format. Brain and Language, 80, 269-286.
50. Yates, M., Locker, L. Jr. & Simpson, G. B. (2003). Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones. Memory & Cognition, 31, 856-866.
51. Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M. & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bi-directional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 504-515.
52. Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M. & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 533-554.
53. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O. & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What's the pronunciation for OUGH and the spelling for /u/? A data-base for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29, 600-618.
54. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G. & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131-1161.