Ecological novelty by hybridization: Experimental evidence for increased thermal tolerance by transgressive segregation in tigriopus californicus

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 204-215

  Pereira, Ricardo J ^a   Barreto, Felipe S ^a   Burton, Ronald S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Hybridization; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CRUSTACEAN; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERPOPULATION VARIATION; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; TEMPERATURE TOLERANCE; THERMAL EVOLUTION;

COPEPODA; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CRUSTACEA; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HEAT; HYBRIDIZATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ADAPTATION; HYBRIDIZATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CRUSTACEA; GENETIC SPECIATION; HOT TEMPERATURE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84890873333     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12254     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abbott, R. J. 1992. Plant invasions, interspecific hybridization and the evolution of new plant taxa. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:401-405.
2. Albertson, R. C., and T. D. Kocher 2005. Genetic architecture sets limits on transgressive segregation in hybrid cichlid fishes. Evolution 59:686-690.
3. Anderson, E., and G. L. Stebbins 1954. Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8:378-388.
4. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, NY.
5. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-149.
6. Bolnick, D. I., M. Turelli, H. Lopez-Fernandez, P. C. Wainwright, and T. J. Near 2008. Accelerated mitochondrial evolution and "Darwin's corollary": asymmetric viability of reciprocal F1 hybrids in Centrarchid fishes. Genetics 178:1037-1048.
7. Brown, A. F. 1991. Outbreeding depression as a cost of dispersal in the harpacticoid copepod, Tigriopus californicus. Biol. Bull. 181:123-126.
8. Buerkle, C., R. Morris, M. Asmussen, and L. Rieseberg 2000. The likelihood of homoploid hybrid speciation. Heredity 84:441-451.
9. Burton, R. S. 1985. Mating system of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Marine Biology 86:247-252.
10. Burton, R. S.. 1990. Hybrid breakdown in developmental time in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution: 1814-1822.
11. Burton, R. S., and F. S. Barreto 2012. A disproportionate role for mtDNA in Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities? Mol. Ecol. 21:4952-4957.
12. Burton, R. S., C. K. Ellison, and J. S. Harrison 2006. The sorry state of F2 hybrids: consequences of rapid mitochondrial DNA evolution in allopatric populations. Am. Nat. 168:S14-24.
13. Clarke, J. H., R. Mithen, J. K. Brown, and C. Dean 1995. QTL analysis of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248:278-286.
14. Cossé, A. A., M. G. Campbell, T. J. Glover, C. E. Linn Jr., J. L. Todd, T. C. Baker, and W. L. Roelofs 1995. Pheromone behavioral responses in unusual male European corn borer hybrid progeny not correlated to electrophysiological phenotypes of their pheromone-specific antennal neurons. Experientia 51:809-816.
15. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
16. deVicente, M. C., and S. D. Tanksley 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134:585-596.
17. Dittrich-Reed, D. R., and B. M. Fitzpatrick 2013. Transgressive hybrids as hopeful monsters. Evol. Biol. 40:310-315.
18. Dybdahl, M. F. 1994. Extinction, recolonization, and the genetic structure of tidepool copepod populations. Evol. Ecol. 8:113-124.
19. Edmands, S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53:1757-1768.
20. Edmands, S.. 2001. Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol. Ecol. 10:1743-1750.
21. Edmands, S., and R. Burton 1999. Cytochrome C oxidase activity in interpopulation hybrids of a marine copepod: a test for nuclear-nuclear or nuclear-cytoplasmic coadaptation. Evolution 53:1972-1978.
22. Ellison, C. K., and R. S. Burton 2008. Interpopulation hybrid breakdown maps to the mitochondrial genome. Evolution 62:631-638.
23. Good, J. M., M. A. Handel, and M. W. Nachman 2008. Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice. Evolution 62:50-65.
24. Grant, P. R., and B. R. Grant 2011. How and why species multiply. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
25. Grant, V. 1981. Plant speciation. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
26. Harrison, R. G. 1993. Hybrids and hybrid zones: historical perspective. Pp. 3-10 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
27. Harrison, R. G.. 2012. The language of speciation. Evolution 66:3643-3657.
28. Hedrick, P. W. 2011. Genetics of populations. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA.
29. Kelly, M. W., E. Sanford, and R. K. Grosberg 2011. Limited potential for adaptation to climate change in a broadly distributed marine crustacean. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 279:349-356.
30. Lewontin, R. C., and L. C. Birch 1966. Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution 20:315-336.
31. Lexer, C., M. E. Welch, J. L. Durphy, and L. H. Rieseberg 2003. Natural selection for salt tolerance quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in wild sunflower hybrids: implications for the origin of Helianthus paradoxus, a diploid hybrid species. Mol. Ecol. 12:1225-1235.
32. Liou, L. W., and T. Price 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
33. Mallet, J. 2008a. Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 363:2971-2986.
34. Mallet, J.. 2008b. Mayr's view of Darwin: was Darwin wrong about speciation? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 95:3-16.
35. Manceau, M., V. S. Domingues, C. R. Linnen, E. B. Rosenblum, and H. E. Hoekstra 2010. Convergence in pigmentation at multiple levels: mutations, genes and function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365:2439-2450.
36. Muller, H. J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Sympos. 6:71-125.
37. Nolte, A. W., J. Freyhof, K. C. Stemshorn, and D. Tautz 2005. An invasive lineage of sculpins, Cottus sp. (Pisces, Teleostei) in the Rhine with new habitat adaptations has originated from hybridization between old phylogeographic groups. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272:2379-2387.
38. Orr, H. A. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139:1805-1813.
39. Palmer, C. A., and S. Edmands 2000. Mate choice in the face of both inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 136:693-698.
40. Presgraves, D. C. 2010. The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:175-180.
41. Rand, D. M., R. A. Haney, and A. J. Fry 2004. Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. TREE 19:645-653.
42. Ranganath, H. A., and S. Aruna 2003. Hybridization, transgressive segregation and evolution of new genetic systems in Drosophila. J. Genet. 82:163-177.
43. Rawson, P. D., and R. S. Burton 2002. Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12955-12958.
44. Rieseberg, L. H. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:359-389.
45. Rieseberg, L. H., N. C. Ellstrand, and M. Arnold 1993. What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12:213-241.
46. Rieseberg, L. H., and J. H. Willis 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317:910-914.
47. Rieseberg, L., M. Archer, and R. K. Wayne 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83:363-372.
48. Schoville, S. D., F. S. Barreto, G. W. Moy, A. Wolff, and R. S. Burton 2012. Investigating the molecular basis of local adaptation to thermal stress: population differences in gene expression across the transcriptome of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. BMC Evol. Biol. 12:170. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-170.
49. Seehausen, O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:198-207.
50. Slatkin, M., and R. Lande 1994. Segregation variance after hybridization of isolated populations. Genet. Res. 64:51-56.
51. Stebbins, G. L. 1959. The role of hybridization in evolution. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 103:231-251. JSTOR.
52. Stelkens, R. B., C. Schmid, O. Selz, and O. Seehausen 2009. Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:283. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-283.
53. Stelkens, R., and O. Seehausen 2009. Genetic distance between species predicts novel trait expression in their hybrids. Evolution 63:884-897.
54. Turelli, M., and L. C. Moyle 2007. Asymmetric postmating isolation: Darwin"s corollary to Haldane"s rule. Genetics 176:1059-1088.
55. Willett, C. S. 2010. Potential fitness trade-offs for thermal tolerance in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 64:2521-2534.
56. Willett, C. S.. 2012a. Hybrid breakdown weakens under thermal stress in population crosses of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. J. Heredity 103:103-114.
57. Willett, C. S.. 2012b. Quantifying the elevation of mitochondrial DNA evolutionary substitution rates over nuclear rates in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. J. Mol. Evol. 74:310-318.
58. Willett, C. S., and R. S. Burton 2001. Viability of cytochrome c genotypes depends on cytoplasmic backgrounds in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55:1592-1599.
59. Willett, C. S., and R. S. Burton 2003. Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses. Evolution 57:2286-2292.
60. Willett, C., and J. Ladner 2009. Investigations of fine-scale phylogeography in Tigriopus californicus reveal historical patterns of population divergence. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-139.