Hybrid breakdown weakens under thermal stress in population crosses of the copepod tigriopus californicus

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 103-114

  Willett, Christopher S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Heterosis; Hybridization; Outbreeding depression; Postzygotic reproductive isolation; Thermal adaptation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPEPOD; CROSS LINKING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC LOAD; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HIGH TEMPERATURE; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPERATURE STRESS; TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CHIMERA; COPEPODA; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 83255176989     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esr109     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Armbruster P, Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM. 1997. Evolution of the genetic architecture underlying fitness in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution. 51:451-458.
2. Armbruster P, Reed DH. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity. 95:235-242. (Pubitemid 43093238)
3. Barbash DA, Roote J, Ashburner M. 2000. The Drosophila melanogaster hybrid male rescue gene causes inviability in male and female species hybrids. Genetics. 154:1747-1771. (Pubitemid 30211255)
4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B. 2011. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. In: R package version 0.999375-38.
5. Bomblies K, Lempe J, Epple P, Warthmann N, Lanz C, Dangl JL, Weigel D. 2007. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Mullertype incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol. 5:e236.
6. Bordenstein SR, Drapeau MD. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the Dobzhansky-Muller model of postzygotic isolation. J Evol Biol. 14:490-501. (Pubitemid 32608181)
7. Burton RS. 1986. Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene flow in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Bull Mar Sci. 39:526-535.
8. Burton RS. 1987. Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution. 41:504-513.
9. Burton RS. 1990. Hybrid breakdown in developmental time in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution. 44:1814-1822.
10. Burton RS. 1997. Genetic evidence for long term persistence of marine invertebrate populations in an ephemeral environment. Evolution. 51:993-998. (Pubitemid 27324486)
11. Burton RS. 1998. Intraspecific phylogeography across the Point Conception biogeographic boundary. Evolution. 52:734-745. (Pubitemid 28324503)
12. Burton RS, Ellison CK, Harrison JS. 2006. The sorry state of F-2 hybrids: consequences of rapid mitochondrial DNA evolution in allopatric populations. Am Nat. 168:S14-S24. (Pubitemid 44865124)
13. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 18:237-268.
14. Coyne JA, Simeonidis S, Rooney P. 1998. Relative paucity of genes causing inviability in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 150:1091-1103. (Pubitemid 28510037)
15. Dahlgaard J, Hoffmann AA. 2000. Stress resistance and environmental dependency of inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Conserv Biol. 14:1187-1192. (Pubitemid 30610462)
16. Demuth JP, Wade MJ. 2007. Population differentiation in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. I. Genetic architecture. Evolution. 61:494-509. (Pubitemid 46657679)
17. Dethier MN. 1980. Tidepools as refuges: predation and the limits of the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus californicus (Baker). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 42:99-111.
18. Dobzhansky T. 1936. Studies on hybrid sterility. II. Localization of sterility factors in Drosophila pseudoobscura hybrids. Genetics. 21:113-135.
19. Dybdahl MF. 1994. Extinction, recolonization, and the genetic structure of tidepool copepod populations. Evol Ecol. 8:113-124. (Pubitemid 2057357)
20. Edmands S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution. 53:1757-1768. (Pubitemid 30044810)
21. Edmands S. 2001. Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol Ecol. 10:1743-1750. (Pubitemid 32667729)
22. Edmands S. 2007. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol. 16:463-475. (Pubitemid 46161073)
23. Edmands S, Deimler JK. 2004. Local adaptation, intrinsic coadaptation and the effects of environmental stress on interpopulation hybrids in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 303:183-196. (Pubitemid 38583482)
24. Egan SP, Funk DJ. 2009. Ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric host forms of Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106:19426-19431.
25. Ellison CK, Burton RS. 2008. Interpopulation hybrid breakdown maps to the mitochondrial genome. Evolution. 62:631-638. (Pubitemid 351348251)
26. Feder JL, Opp SB, Wlazlo B, Reynolds K, Go W, Spisak S. 1994. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 91:7990-7994. (Pubitemid 24253871)
27. Fox CW, Reed DH. 2011. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution. 65:246-258
28. Fuller RC. 2008. Genetic incompatibilities in killifish and the role of environment. Evolution. 62:3056-3068.
29. Harrison JS, Burton RS. 2006. Tracing hybrid incompatibilities to single amino acid substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 23:559-564. (Pubitemid 43278267)
30. Hatfield T, Schluter D. 1999. Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution. 53:866-873. (Pubitemid 29332419)
31. Hawthorne DJ, Via S. 2001. Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature. 412:904-907. (Pubitemid 32821733)
32. Kelly MW, Sanford E, Grosberg RK. 2011. Limited potential for adaptation to climate change in a broadly distributed marine crustacean. Proc Biol Sci. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0542.
33. Martin NH, Bouck AC, Arnold ML. 2006. Detecting adaptive trait introgression between Iris fulva and I. brevicaulis in highly selective field conditions. Genetics. 172:2481-2489.
34. Matute DR, Novak CJ, Coyne JA. 2009. Temperature-based extrinsic reproductive isolation in two species of Drosophila. Evolution. 63:595-612.
35. McBride CS, Singer MC. 2010. Field studies reveal strong postmating isolation between ecologically divergent butterfly populations. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000529.
36. Mikkelsen K, Loeschcke V, Kristensen TN. 2010. Trait specific consequences of fast and slow inbreeding: lessons from captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Conserv Genet. 11:479-488.
37. Muller HJ. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol Symp. 6:71-125.
38. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature. 417:440-443. (Pubitemid 34563535)
39. Palmer CA, Edmands S. 2000. Mate choice in the face of both inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar Biol. 136:693-698. (Pubitemid 30334351)
40. Pedersen KS, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V. 2005. Effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster-Hsp70 expression and fitness. J Evol Biol. 18:756-762. (Pubitemid 40968527)
41. Powlick JJ. 1998. Seasonal abundance and population flux of Tigriopus californicus (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in Barkley sound, British Columbia. J Mar Biol Assoc U K. 78:467-481.
42. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2.12.2 ed. Vienna (Austria): Foundation for Statistical Computing. Rawson PD, Burton RS. 2002. Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:12955-12958.
43. Rhode JM, Cruzan MB. 2005. Contributions of heterosis and epistasis to hybrid fitness. Am Nat. 166:E124-E139.
44. Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, Nakazato T, Durphy JL, Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Lexer C. 2003. Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science. 301:1211-1216. (Pubitemid 37052203)
45. Rundle HD, Whitlock MC. 2001. A genetic interpretation of ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution. 55:198-201. (Pubitemid 32175296)
46. Wade MJ, Johnson NA, Toquenaga Y. 1999. Temperature effects and genotype-by-environment interactions in hybrids: Haldane's rule in flour beetles. Evolution. 53:855-865. (Pubitemid 29332418)
47. Willett CS. 2004. Evolution of interacting proteins in the mitochondrial electron transport system in a marine copepod. Mol Biol Evol. 21:443-453. (Pubitemid 38339661)
48. Willett CS. 2006. Deleterious epistatic interactions between electron transport system protein-coding loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Genetics. 173:1465-1477. (Pubitemid 44127650)
49. Willett CS. 2008. No evidence for faster male hybrid sterility in population crosses of an intertidal copepod (Tigriopus californicus). Genetica. 133:129-136. (Pubitemid 351661606)
50. Willett CS. 2010. Potential fitness tradeoffs for thermal tolerance in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution. 64:2521-2534.
51. Willett CS. 2011. The nature of interactions that contribute to postzygotic reproductive isolation in hybrid copepods. Genetica. 139:575-588.
52. Willett CS, Burton RS. 2003. Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses. Evolution. 57:2286-2292. (Pubitemid 37388020)
53. Willett CS, Ladner JT. 2009. Investigations of fine-scale phylogeography in Tigriopus californicus reveal historical patterns of population divergence. BMC Evol Biol. 9:139.