Individual traits as drivers of spatial dispersal and infestation patterns in a host-bark beetle system

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 273, Issue , 2014, Pages 264-276

  Kautz, Markus ^a   Schopf, Reinhard ^a   Imron, Muhammad Ali ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Adaptive behavior; Host selection; Individual based modeling; Infestation Pattern Simulation (IPS) model; Ips typographus; OAT sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; HOST SELECTION; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELING; IPS TYPOGRAPHUS; OAT-SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; PATTERN SIMULATION;

BIOHAZARDS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

FORESTRY;

ADAPTATION; BEETLE; DISPERSAL; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HOST SELECTION; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SYNCHRONY;

FORESTRY; MODELS; SIMULATION;

EID: 84890814045     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Allan R.J. Survey of Agent Based Modelling and Simulation Tools. Technical report DL-TR-2010-007 2010, Canadian Forest Service, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Warrington, UK.
2. Anderbrant O., Schlyter F., Birgersson G. Intraspecific competition affecting parents and offspring in the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oikos 1985, 45:89-98.
3. Atkins M.D. Lipid loss with flight in the Douglas-fir beetle. Can. Entomol. 1969, 101:164-165.
4. Aukema B.H., Carroll A.L., Zhu J., Raffa K.F., Sickley T.A., Taylor S.W. Landscape level analysis of mountain pine beetle in British Columbia, Canada: spatiotemporal developments and spatial synchrony within the present outbreak. Ecography 2006, 29:427-441.
5. Baier P., Pennerstorfer J., Schopf A. PHENIPS-a comprehensive phenology model of Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytinae) as a tool for hazard rating of bark beetle infestation. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2007, 249:171-186.
6. Bakke A. Host tree and bark beetle interaction during a mass outbreak of Ips typographus in Norway. J. Appl. Entomol. 1983, 96:118-125.
7. Bentz B., Logan J., Amman G. Temperature-dependent development of the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and simulation of its phenology. Can. Entomol. 1991, 123:1083-1094.
8. Biermann G. Zur Überwinterung des Buchdruckers, Ips typographus (L.), in der Bodenstreu (Col., Scolytidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 1977, 84:59-74. (German).
9. Birgersson G., Schlyter F., Löfqvist J., Bergström G. Quantitative variation of pheromone components in the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus from different attack phases. J. Chem. Ecol. 1984, 10:1029-1055.
10. Bohlander F. Zum energetischen Status des Buchdruckers Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) 1996, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, (dissertation, German).
11. Botterweg P. Dispersal and flight behaviour of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in relation to sex, size and fat content. J. Appl. Entomol. 1982, 94:466-489.
12. Botterweg P.F. The effect of attack density on size, fat content and emergence of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus L. J. Appl. Entomol. 1983, 96:47-55.
13. Burnell D.G. A dispersal-aggregation model for mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine stands. Res. Popul. Ecol. 1977, 19:99-106.
14. Byers J.A. Simulation and equation models of insect population control by pheromone-baited traps. J. Chem. Ecol. 1993, 19:1939-1956.
15. Byers J.A. An encounter rate model of bark beetle populations searching at random for susceptible host trees. Ecol. Model. 1996, 91:57-66.
16. Byers J.A. Effects on attraction radius and flight paths on catch of scolytid beetles dispersing outward through rings of pheromone traps. J. Chem. Ecol. 1999, 25:985-1005.
17. Byers J.A. Wind-aided dispersal of simulated bark beetles flying through forests. Ecol. Model. 2000, 125:231-243.
18. Byers J.A. Chemical ecology of bark beetles in a complex olfactory landscape. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis 2004, 89-134. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire, H.F. Evans (Eds.).
19. Byers J.A. Modeling distributions of flying insects: effective attraction radius of pheromone in two and three dimensions. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 256:81-89.
20. Byers J.A. Estimating insect flight densities from attractive trap catches and flight height distributions. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012, 38:592-601.
21. Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Riska R., Satelli A. The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling. Ecol. Model. 2007, 203:167-182.
22. Christiansen E., Waring R.H., Berryman A.A. Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. Forest Ecol. Manage. 1987, 22:89-106.
23. Chubaty A.M., Roitberg B.D., Li C. A dynamic host selection model for mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:1241-1250.
24. DeAngelis D.L., Rose K.A. Which individual-based approach is most appropriate for a given problem?. Individual-based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations, Communities, and Ecosystems 1992, 67-87. Chapman and Hall, New York. D.L. DeAngelis, L.J. Gross (Eds.).
25. Dodds K.J., Garman S.L., Ross D.W. Landscape analyses of Douglas-fir beetle populations in northern Idaho. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2006, 231:119-130.
26. Doležal P., Sehnal F. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on the development and diapause of the bark beetle Ips typographus. J. Appl. Entomol. 2007, 131:165-173.
27. Dworschak K. Ecophysiology of the European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.): factors affecting individual fitness, dispersal and population dynamics 2013, Technische Universität München, (dissertation).
28. Edburg S.L., Hicke J.A., Brooks P.D., Pendall E.G., Ewers B.E., Norton U., et al. Cascading impacts of bark beetle-caused tree mortality on coupled biogeophysical and biogeochemical processes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2012, 10:416-424.
29. Eidmann H.H. Impact of bark beetles on forests and forestry in Sweden. J. Appl. Entomol. 1997, 114:193-200.
30. Elkin C.M., Reid M.L. Low energy reserves and energy allocation decisions affect reproduction by mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19:102-109.
31. Elkin C.M., Reid M.L. Shifts in breeding habitat selection behaviour in response to population density. Oikos 2010, 119:1070-1080.
32. Fahse L., Heurich M. Simulation and analysis of outbreaks of bark beetle infestations and their management at the stand level. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:1833-1846.
33. FAO Global forest resources assessment 2010. Forestry paper 163 2010, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
34. Fares Y., Sharpe P.J.H., Magnuson C.E. Pheromone dispersion in forests. J. Theor. Biol. 1980, 84:335-359.
35. Forsse E. Flight propensity and diapause incidence in five populations of the bark beetle Ips typographus in Scandinavia. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1991, 61:53-57.
36. Franceschi V.R., Krokene P., Christiansen E., Krekling T. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 2005, 167:353-376.
37. Franklin A.J., Grégoire J-C. Dose-dependent response and preliminary observations on attraction range of Ips typographus to pheromones at low release rates. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27:2425-2435.
38. Geiszler D.R., Gallucci V.F., Gara R.I. Modeling the dynamics of mountain pine beetle aggregation in a lodgepole pine stand. Oecologia 1980, 46:244-253.
39. Gilbert M., Grégoire J-C. Site condition and predation influence a bark beetle's success: a spatially realistic approach. Agric. Forest Entomol. 2003, 5:87-96.
40. Grégoire J-C., Evans H.F. Damage and control of BAWBILT organisms, an overview. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis 2004, 19-37. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire, H.F. Evans (Eds.).
41. Gries G. Zur Bedeutung des Reifungsfrasses für die Dispersion des Kupferstechers (Pityogenes chalcographus L., Col., Scolytidae) und zum Dispersionsverhalten des Buchdruckers (Ips typographus L., Col., Scolytidae) 1984, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, (dissertation, German).
42. Gries G., Nolte R., Sanders W. Computer simulated host selection in Ips typographus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1989, 53:211-217.
43. Grimm V., Railsback S.F. Individual-based Modelling and Ecology 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
44. Grimm V., Berger U., Bastiansen F., Eliassen S., Ginot V., Giske J., et al. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol. Model. 2006, 198:115-126.
45. Grimm V., Berger U., DeAngelis D.L., Polhill J.G., Giske J., Railsback S.F. The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221:2760-2768.
46. Grodzki W. Some reactions of Ips typographus (L.) (Col.: Scolytidae) to changing breeding conditions in a forest decline area in the Sudeten Mountains, Poland. J. Pest. Sci. 2004, 77:43-48.
47. Hawkes C. Linking movement behaviour, dispersal and population processes: is individual variation a key. J. Anim. Ecol. 2009, 78:894-906.
48. Hughes J., Fall A., Safranyik L., Lertzman K.P. Modeling the Effect of Landscape Pattern on Mountain Pine Beetles. Information report BC-X-407 2006, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC.
49. Imron M.A., Gergs A., Berger U. Structure and sensitivity analysis of individual-based predator-prey models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012, 107:71-78.
50. Jactel H., Petit J., Desprez-Loustau M.-L., Delzon S., Piou D., Battisti A., et al. Drought effects on damage by forest insects and pathogens: a meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 2012, 18:267-276.
51. Jakuš R. Bark beetle (Col., Scolytidae) communities and host and site factors on tree level in Norway spruce primeval natural forest. J Appl. Entomol. 1995, 119:643-651.
52. Jakuš R., Edwards-Jonášová M., Cudlín P., Blaženec M., Ježik M., Havlíček F., et al. Characteristics of Norway spruce trees (Picea abies) surviving a spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) outbreak. Trees 2011, 25:965-973.
53. Kareiva P.M., Shigesada N. Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 1983, 56:234-238.
54. Kärvemo S. Population Dynamics of Tree-killing Bark Beetles-a Comparison of the European Spruce Bark Beetle and the North American Mountain Pine Beetle. Introductory Research Essay 2010, SLU, Department of Ecology, Uppsala.
55. Kausrud K.L., Grégoire J.-C., Skarpaas O., Erbilgin N., Gilbert M., Økland B., et al. Trees wanted-dead or alive! Host selection and population dynamics in tree-killing bark beetles. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18274.
56. Kausrud K., Økland B., Skarpaas O., Grégoire J.-C., Erbilgin N., Stenseth N.C. Population dynamics in changing environments: the case of an eruptive forest pest species. Biol. Rev. 2012, 87:34-51.
57. Kautz M., Dworschak K., Gruppe A., Schopf R. Quantifying spatio-temporal dispersion of bark beetle infestations in epidemic and non-epidemic conditions. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262:598-608.
58. Komonen A., Schroeder L.M., Weslien J. Ips typographus population development after a severe storm in a nature reserve in southern Sweden. J. Appl. Entomol. 2011, 135:132-141.
59. Kurz W.A., Dymond C.C., Stinson G., Rampley G.J., Neilson E.T., Carroll A.L., et al. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 2008, 452:987-990.
60. Latty T.M., Reid M.L. Who goes first? Condition and danger dependent pioneering in a group-living bark beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2010, 64:639-646.
61. Lausch A., Fahse L., Heurich M. Factors affecting the spatio-temporal dispersion of Ips typographus (L.) in Bavarian Forest National Park: a long-term quantitative landscape-level analysis. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2011, 261:233-245.
62. Lausch A., Heurich M., Fahse L. Spatio-temporal infestation patterns of Ips typographus (L.) in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 31:73-81.
63. Lehmberg L. Emission von Kommunikationsstoffen des Buchdruckers: Effekt auf Artgenossen und zeitlicher Verlauf 2013, Technische Universität München, (dissertation, German).
64. Lewis M.A., Nelson W., Xu C. A structured threshold model for mountain pine beetle outbreak. Bull. Math. Biol. 2010, 72:565-589.
65. Logan J.A., White P., Bentz B.J., Powell J.A. Model Analysis of Spatial Patterns in Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreaks. Theor. Popul. Biol 1998, 53:236-255.
66. Lomnicki A. Population ecology from the individual perspective. Individual-based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations, Communities, and Ecosystems 1992, 3-17. Chapman and Hall, New York. D.L. DeAngelis, L.J. Gross (Eds.).
67. Lomnicki A. Individual-based Models in Population Ecology. eLS 2011, Wiley, Chichester.
68. Marini L., Lindelöw Å., Jönsson A.M., Wulff S., Schroeder L.M. Population dynamics of the spruce bark beetle: a long-term study. Oikos 2013, 122:1768-1776.
69. McLane A.J., Semeniuk C., McDermid G.J., Marceau D.J. The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:1544-1556.
70. Mitchell R.G., Preisler H.K. Analysis of spatial patterns of lodgepole pine attacked by outbreak populations of the mountain pine beetle. Forest Sci. 1991, 37:1390-1408.
71. Mulock P., Christiansen E. The threshold of successful attack by Ips typographus on Picea abies: a field experiment. Forest Ecol. Manage. 1986, 14:125-132.
72. Nathan R., Perry G., Cronin J.T., Strand A.E., Cain M.L. Methods for estimating long-distance dispersal. Oikos 2003, 103:261-273.
73. Nelson W.A., Lewis M.A. Connecting host physiology to host resistance in the conifer-bark beetle system. Theor. Ecol. 2008, 1:163-177.
74. Netherer S., Nopp-Mayr U. Predisposition assessment systems (PAS) as supportive tools in forest management-rating of site and stand-related hazards of bark beetle infestation in the High Tatra Mountains as an example for system application and verification. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2005, 207:99-107.
75. Paynter Q.E., Anderbrant O., Schlyter F. Behavior of male and female spruce bark beetles, Ips typographus, on the bark of host trees during mass attack. J. Insect Behav. 1990, 3:529-543.
76. Pérez L., Dragičevič S. ForestSimMPB: a swarming intelligence and agent-based modeling approach for mountain pine beetle outbreaks. Ecol. Inform. 2011, 6:62-72.
77. Pureswaran D.S., Borden J.H. Primary attraction and kairomonal host discrimination in three species of Dendroctonus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Agric. Forest Entomol. 2005, 7:219-230.
78. Raffa K.F., Berryman A.A. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behaviour and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 1983, 53:27-49.
79. Raffa K.F., Aukema B.H., Bentz B.J., Carroll A., Hicke J.A., Turner M.G., et al. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 2008, 58:501-517.
80. Railsback S.F., Grimm V. Agent-based and Individual-based Models: A Practical Introduction 2012, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
81. Robertson C., Nelson T.A., Boots B. Mountain pine beetle dispersal: the spatial-temporal interaction of infestations. Forest Sci. 2007, 53:395-405.
82. Rudinsky J.A. Ecology of Scolytidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1962, 7:327-348.
83. Saint-Germain M., Buddle C.M., Drapeau P. Primary attraction and random landing in host-selection by wood-feeding insects: a matter of scale. Agric. Forest Entomol. 2007, 9:227-235.
84. Sallé A., Raffa K.F. Interactions among intraspecific competition, emergence patterns, and host selection behavior in Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytinae). Ecol. Entomol. 2007, 32:162-171.
85. Saltelli A., Annoni P. How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:1508-1517.
86. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., et al. Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer 2008, Wiley, Chichester.
87. Schellink J., White T. A review of attraction and repulsion models of aggregation: methods, findings and a discussion of model validation. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:1897-1911.
88. Schlyter F. Sampling range, attraction range, and effective attraction radius: estimates of trap efficiency and communication distance in coleopteran pheromone and host attractant systems. J. Appl. Entomol. 1992, 114:439-454.
89. Schlyter F., Birgersson G., Leufven A. Inhibition of attraction to aggregation pheromone by verbenone and ipsenol-density regulation mechanisms in bark beetle Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 1989, 15:2263-2277.
90. Schroeder L.M., Eidmann H.H. Attacks of bark- and wood-boring coleoptera on snow-broken conifers over a two-year period. Scand. J. Forest Res. 1993, 8:257-265.
91. Shargel B., Wilensky U. BehaviorSpace 2002, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, Software available from: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/docs/behaviorspace.html.
92. Strand T., Lamb B., Thistle H., Allwine E., Peterson H. A simple model for simulation of insect pheromone dispersion within forest canopies. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:640-656.
93. Turchin P., Thoeny W.T. Quantifying dispersal of southern pine beetles with mark-recapture experiments and a diffusion model. Ecol. Appl. 1993, 3:187-198.
94. Vinatier F., Tixier P., Duyck P-F., Lescourret F. Factors and mechanisms explaining spatial heterogeneity: a review of methods for insect populations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2011, 2:11-22.
95. Vité J.P., Bakke A., Renwick J.A.A. Pheromones in Ips (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): occurrence and production. Can. Entomol. 1972, 104:1967-1975.
96. Wallin K.F., Raffa K.F. Feedback between individual host selection behavior and population dynamics in an eruptive herbivore. Ecol. Monogr. 2004, 74:101-116.
97. Wallin K.F., Rutledge J., Raffa K.F. Heritability of host acceptance and gallery construction behaviors of the bark beetle Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 2002, 31:1276-1281.
98. Waring R.H., Pitman G.B. A simple model of host resistance to bark beetles. Research note 65 1980, Oregon State University: Forest Research Laboratory.
99. Wermelinger B. Development and distribution of predators and parasitoids during two consecutive years of an Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae) infestation. J. Appl. Entomol. 2002, 126:521-527.
100. Wermelinger B. Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus-a review of recent research. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2004, 202:67-82.
101. Wermelinger B., Seifert M. Analysis of the temperature dependent development of the spruce bark beetle lps typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 1998, 122:185-191.
102. Wermelinger B., Seifert M. Temperature-dependent reproduction of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus, and analysis of the potential population growth. Ecol. Entomol. 1999, 24:103-110.
103. Weslien J., Regnander J. Colonization densities and offspring production in the bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) in standing trees. J. Appl. Entomol. 1990, 109:358-366.
104. Wilensky U. NetLogo 1999, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling; Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, Technical report. Software available from: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo.
105. Williams W.I., Robertson I.C. Using automated flight mills to manipulate fat reserves in Douglas-fir beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environ. Entomol. 2008, 37:850-856.
106. Wood D.L. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behaviour of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1982, 27:411-446.
107. Zolubas P., Byers J.A. Recapture of dispersing bark beetle Ips typographus L. (Col., Scolytidae) in pheromone-baited traps: regression models. J. Appl. Entomol. 1995, 119:285-289.
108. Zumr V. Dispersal of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytidae) in spruce woods. J. Appl. Entomol. 1992, 114:348-352.
109. Zumr V., Němec V., Starý P. Seasonal changes in the nutrient content in the bodies of Ips typographus L. (Col., Scolytidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 1985, 100:464-468.