Population dynamics of the spruce bark beetle: A long-term study

Oikos

Volumn 122, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1768-1776

  Marini, Lorenzo ^a   Lindelöw, Åke ^b   Jönsson, Anna Maria ^c   Wulff, Sören ^b   Schroeder, Leif Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; DECIDUOUS TREE; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LONG-TERM CHANGE; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; THEORETICAL STUDY; TIME SERIES;

SWEDEN;

COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; IPS TYPOGRAPHUS; PICEA; SCOLYTINAE; THANASIMUS FORMICARIUS;

EID: 84888057546     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00431.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderbrant O. et al. 1985. Intraspecific competition affecting parents and offspring in the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oikos 45: 89-98.
2. Annila E. 1969. Influence of temperature upon development and voltinism of Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 6: 161-298.
3. Arnold T. W. 2010. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike's information criterion. J. Wildlife Manage. 74: 1175-1178.
4. Aukema B. H. et al. 2008. Movement of outbreak populations of mountain pine beetle: infl{ligature}uences of spatiotemporal patterns and climate. Ecography 31: 348-358.
5. Baier P. et al. 2007. PHENIPS - a comprehensive phenology model of Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytinae) as a tool for hazard rating of bark beetle infestation. For. Ecol. Manage. 249: 171-186.
6. Bakke A. 1992. Monitoring bark beetle populations: effects of temperature. J. Appl. Entomol. 114: 208-211.
7. Bakke A. and Kvamme T. 1981. Kairomone response in Thanasimus predators to pheromone components of Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 7: 305-312.
8. Barton K. 2010. MuMIn: multi-model inference R package, ver. 01317.
9. Berryman A. A. 2002. Population cycles: the case of trophic interactions. - Oxford Univ. Press.
10. Burnham K. P. and Anderson D. R. 2002. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. - Springer.
11. Byers J. 1989. Behavioral mechanisms involved in reducing competition in bark beetles. Ecography 12: 466-476.
12. Christiansen E. and Bakke A. 1988. The spruce bark beetle of Eurasia. - In: Berryman A. A. (ed.), Dynamics of forest insect populations. Plenum Publishing Corporation, pp. 479-503.
13. Cronin J. T. et al. 2000. The pattern and range of movement of a checkered beetle predator relative to its bark beetle prey. Oikos 90: 127-138.
14. Faccoli M. 2009. Effect of weather on Ips typographus (Coleoptera Curculionidae) phenology, voltinism and associated spruce mortality in the southeastern Alps. Environ. Entomol. 38: 307-316.
15. Grégoire J.-C. and Evans H. F. 2004. Damage and control of BAWBILT organisms - an overview. - In: Lieutier F. et al. (eds), Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwert Academic Publishers, pp. 19-37.
16. Haylock M. R. et al. 2008. A European daily high-resolution gridded dataset of surface temperature and precipitation. J. Geophys. Res. 113: D20119.
17. Jactel H. et al. 2012. Drought effects on damage by forest insects and pathogens: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biol. 18: 267-276.
18. Jönsson A. M. et al. 2007. Impact of climate change on the population dynamics of Ips typographicus in southern Sweden. Agric. For. Meteorol. 146: 70-81.
19. Jönsson A. M. et al. 2009. Spatio-temporal impact of climate change on the activity and voltinism of the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. Global Change Biol. 15: 486-499.
20. Jönsson A. M. et al. 2011. Modelling the potential impact of global warming on Ips typographus voltinism and reproductive diapauses. Clim. Change 109: 695-718.
21. Jönsson A. M. et al. 2012. Guess the impact of Ips typographus- an ecosystem modelling approach for simulating spruce bark beetle outbreaks. Agric. For. Meteorol. 166-167: 188-200.
22. Kausrud K. et al. 2011. Population dynamics in changing environments: the case of an eruptive forest pest species. Biol. Rev. 87: 34-51.
23. Kenis M. et al. 2004. Damage and control of BAWBILT organisms - an overview. In: Lieutier F. et al. (eds.), Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwert Academic Publishers, pp. 237-290.
24. Komonen A. et al. 2011. Ips typographus population development after a severe storm in a nature reserve in southern Sweden. J. Appl. Entomol. 135: 132-141.
25. Koštál V. et al. 2011. Physiological and biochemical analysis of overwintering and cold tolerance in two central European populations of the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. J. Insect Physiol. 57: 1136-1146.
26. Logan J. A. and Powell J. A. 2001. Ghost forests, global warming and the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Am. Entomol. 47: 160-173.
27. Lombardero M. J. et al. 2000. Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defenses of loblolly pine. Ecol. Lett. 3: 329-339.
28. Marini L. et al. 2012. Climate affects severity and altitudinal distribution of outbreaks in an eruptive bark beetle. Clim. Change 115: 327-341.
29. Mills N. J. 1985. Some observations on the role of predation in the natural regulation of Ips typographus populations. Z. Angew. Entomol. 99: 209-320.
30. Netherer S. and Pennerstorfer S. 2001. Parameters relevant for modelling the potential development of Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Integr. Pest Manage. Rev. 6: 177-184.
31. Økland B. and Berryman A. 2004. Resource dynamics plays a key role in regional fluctuations of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. Agric. For. Entomol. 6: 141-146.
32. Økland B. and Bjørnstad O. N. 2006. A resource-depletion model of forest insect outbreaks. Ecology 87: 283-290.
33. Økland B. et al. 2005. Are bark beetle outbreaks less synchronous than forest Lepidoptera outbreaks? Oecologia 146: 365-72.
34. Preisler H. K. et al. 2012. Climate and weather influences on spatiotemporal patterns of mountain pine beetle outbreaks in Washington and Oregon. Ecology 93: 2421-2434.
35. Raffa K. F. et al. 2008. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. BioScience 58: 501-517.
36. Reeve J. D. 1997. Predation and bark beetle dynamics. Oecologia 112: 48-54.
37. Reeve J. D. and Turchin P. 2002. Evidence for predator prey cycles in a bark beetle. - In: Berryman A. A. (ed.), Population cycles: evidence for trophic interactions. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 92-108.
38. Reeve J. D. et al. 1995. Host suitability, predation, and bark beetle population dynamics. - In: Cappuccino N. and Price P. (eds), Population dynamics: new approaches and synthesis. Academic Press, pp. 339-357.
39. Rouault G. et al. 2006. Effects of drought and heat on forest insect populations in relation to the 2003 drought in western Europe. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 613-624.
40. Sambaraju K. R. et al. 2012. Climate change could alter the distribution of mountain pine beetle outbreaks in western Canada. Ecography 35: 211-223.
41. Schelhaas M. J. et al. 2003. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Global Change Biol. 9: 1620-1633.
42. Schroeder L. M. 1996. Interactions between the predators Thanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae) and Rhizophagus depressus (Col: Rhizophagidae), and the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda (Col.: Scolytidae). Biocontrol 41: 63-75.
43. Schroeder L. M. 1999. Prolonged development time of the bark beetle predator Thanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae) in relation to its prey species Tomicus piniperda (L.) and Ips typographus (L.) (Col.: Scolytidae). Agric. For. Entomol. 1: 127-135.
44. Schroeder L. M. 2003. Differences in responses to α-pinene and ethanol, and flight periods between the bark beetle predators Thanasimus femoralis and T. formicarius (Col.: Cleridae). For. Ecol. Manage. 177: 301-311.
45. Schroeder L. M. 2007. Escape in space from enemies: a comparison between stands with and without enhanced densities of the spruce bark beetle. Agric. For. Entomol. 9: 85-91.
46. Seidl R. et al. 2011. Climate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the eastern Alps. Clim. Change 106: 225-254.
47. Turchin P. 2003. Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. - Princeton Univ. Press.
48. van den Besselaar E. J. M. et al. 2011. A European daily high-resolution observational gridded data set of sea level preassure. J. Geophys. Res. 116: D11110.
49. Warzée N. et al. 2006. Predator/prey ratios: a measure of bark-beetle population status influenced by stand composition in different French stands after the 1999 storms. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 301-308.
50. Weslien J. and Schroeder L. M. 1999. Population levels of bark beetles and associated insects in managed and unmanaged spruce stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 155: 267-275.
51. Wermelinger B. 2002. Development and distribution of predators and parasitoids during two consecutive years of an Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae) infestation. J. Appl. Entomol. 126: 521-527.
52. Wermelinger B. 2004. Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus- a review of recent research. For. Ecol. Manage. 202: 67-82.
53. Wermelinger B. and Seifert M. 1998. Analysis of the temperature dependent development of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 122: 185-191.
54. Worrell R. 1983. Damage by the spruce bark beetle in south Norway 1970-80: a survey, and factors affecting its occurrence. Medd. Norsk Inst. Skogforsk 38: 1-34.