Characteristics of Norway spruce trees (Picea abies) surviving a spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) outbreak

Trees - Structure and Function

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 965-973

  Jakus R ^a,c   Edwards Jonasova M ^b   Cudlin P ^b   Blazenec M ^a   Jezik M ^a   Havlicek F ^b   Moravec, Ivo ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

^b INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS   (Czech Republic)

^c CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Bark beetle attack; Crown geometry; Host selection; Ips typographus; Norway spruce

Indexed keywords

BARK BEETLE; BARK BEETLE ATTACKS; BASAL AREA; CROWN LENGTHS; CROWN STRUCTURE; CZECH REPUBLIC; HOST SELECTION; IPS TYPOGRAPHUS; LIFE EXPECTANCIES; NATIONAL PARKS; NORWAY SPRUCE; NORWAY SPRUCE TREES; PICEA ABIES; PRIMARY STRUCTURES; SPRUCE BARK BEETLES; SPRUCE FOREST; SPRUCE TREES;

PARKS;

FORESTRY;

BASAL AREA; FORESTRY; INSECTS; PICEA ABIES;

COLEOPTERA; IPS TYPOGRAPHUS; PICEA; PICEA ABIES; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 81155137753     PISSN: 09311890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-011-0571-9     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Akkuzu E, Sariyildiz T, Kucuk M, Duman A (2009) Ips typographus (L.) and Thanasimus formicarius (L.) populations influenced by aspect and slope position in Artvin-Hatila valley national park, Turkey. Afr J Biotechnol 8(5): 877-882.
2. Baier P (1996) Defence reactions of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) to controlled attacks of Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytidae) in relation to tree parameters. J Appl Entomol 120: 587-593.
3. Baier P, Bader R (1997) Gehalt und Emission von Monoterpenen der Fichtenrinde und deren Bedeutung für die Primärattraktion von Borkenkäfern (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Entomol 11: 639-643.
4. Changsheng L, Yongfang X, Colin F, Houllier F (1998) Crown morphology of Norway spruce from usual tree measurements. J For Res 9(I): 8-12.
5. Christiansen E (1991) Ips typographus and Ophiostoma polonicum versus Norway spruce: joint attack and host tree defense. In: Baranchikov YN, Mattson WJ, Hain FP, Paine TL, (eds) Forest insect guilds: patterns of interactions with host trees US, For Serv, Northeast For Exp Stn, Gen Tech Rep NE-153, pp 321-334.
6. Christiansen E, Horntvedt R (1983) Combined Ips/Ceratocystis attack on Norway spruce, and defensive mechanisms of the trees. Z Angew Entomol 96: 110-118.
7. Christiansen E, Waring RH, Berryman AA (1987) Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. For Ecol Manag 22(1-2): 89-106.
8. Ewald J (2005) Ecological background of crown condition, growth and nutritional status of Picea abies (L.) Karst. in the Bavarian Alps. Eur J Forest Res 124: 9-18.
9. Fettig CJ, Klepzig KD, Billings RF, Munson AS, Nebeker TE, Negron JF, Nowak JT (2007) The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. Forest Ecol Manage 238: 24-53.
10. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T (2005) Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 167: 353-376.
11. Führer E, Lindenthal J, Baier P (1997) Baummortalität bei Fichte: Zusammenhänge zwischen prämortaler Vitalitätsdynamik und dem Befall durch rindenbrütende Insekten. Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angw Entomol 11: 645-648.
12. Gatsuk LE, Smirnova OV, Vorontzova LI, Zaugolnova LB, Ztiukova LA (1980) Age states of plants of various grown forms: a review. J Ecol 68: 675-696.
13. Grodzki W, Jakuš R, Lajzová E, Sitková Z, Manczka T, Škvarenina J (2006) Effects of intensive versus no management strategies during an outbreak of the bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) (Col.: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in the Tatra Mts. in Poland and Slovakia. Annal For Sci 63(1): 55-61.
14. Gruber F (1994) Morphology of coniferous trees: possible effects of soil acidification on the morphology of Norway spruce and Silver fir. In: Godbold DL, Hüttermann A (eds) Effects of acid rain on forest processes. J Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 265-324.
15. Hasenauer H, Monserud RA (1996) A crown ratio model for Austrian forests. For Ecol Mgmt 84: 49-60.
16. Heidger CM, Lieutier F (2002) Possibilities to utilize tree resistance to insects in forest pest management in central and western Europe. In: Wagner MR, Clancy KM, Lieutier F, Paine TD (eds) Mechanisms and deployment of resistance in tree to insects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 239-263.
17. Hilszczanski J, Janiszewski W, Negron J, Munson AS (2006) Stand characteristics and Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Curculionidae, Scolytinae) infestation during outbreak in northeastern Poland. Folia Forestalia Polonica. Series A-Forestry 48: 53-64.
18. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.
19. Jakuš R (1995) Bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) communities and host and site factors on tree level in Norway spruce primeval natural forest. J Appl Entomol 119: 643-651.
20. Jakuš R (1998) Types of bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infestation in spruce forest stands affected by air pollution, bark beetle outbreak and honey fungus (Armillaria mellea). Anz. Für Schädlingskunde 71: 41-49.
21. Jakus R, Grodzki W, Jezík M, Jachym M (2003) Definition of spatial patterns of bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) outbreak spreading in Tatra mountains (Central Europe), using GIS. In: McManus, Liebhold (eds) Proceedings of Ecology, Survey and Management of Forest Insects; 2002 September 1-5; Kraków, Poland. Gen Tech Rep NE-311, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northestern Research Station, Newton Square, PA pp 25-32.
22. Johnson PC, Coster JE (1978) Probability of attack by southern pine beetle in relation to distance from an attractive host tree. For Sci 24: 574-580.
23. Kantola A, Mäkelä A (2004) Crown development in Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.]. Trees 18: 408-421.
24. Korpel' S. (1989) Pralesy Slovenska. Veda, Bratislava, p 332.
25. Korpel' S. (1995) Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, p 310.
26. Kozlowski TT (1969) Tree physiology and forest pests. J For 67: 118-123.
27. Lesinski JA, Landman G (1985) Crown and branch malformation in conifers related to forest decline. In: Cape JN, Mathy P (eds), Scientific Basis of Forest Decline Symptomatology, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. Air Pol Res Rep 15: 92-105.
28. Lorio LP (1980) Rating stands for susceptibility to SPB. In: Thatcher RC, Searcy JL, Coster JE, Hertel GD (eds) The southern pine beetle. USDA, Expanded Southern Pine Beetle Research and Application Program, Forest Service, Science and Education Administration, Pineville, LA. Tech Bull 1631: 153-163.
29. Merker E (1956) Der Widerstand von Fichten gegen Borkenkäferfraβ, Allg. Forst- u. J.-Ztg. 127: 168-187.
30. Moravec I, Cudlín P, Polák T, Havlíček F (2002) Spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) infestation and Norway spruce status: is there a causal relationship? Silva Gabreta 8: 255-264.
31. Negrón JF, McMillin JD, Anhold JA, Coulson D (2009) Bark beetle-caused mortality in a drought-affected ponderosa pine landscape in Arizona, USA. For Ecol Manag 257: 1353-1362.
32. Ozaki K, Fukuyama K, Maet K, Itoh K (1998) Density effects on the conifer mortality in declining spruce-fir forest in northern Japan: implication of bark beetle attack to, cause spruce decline. J For Res 3: 231-235.
33. Polák T, Cudlín P, Moravec I (2007) Macroscopic indicators for the retrospective assessment of Norway spruce crown response to stress in the Krkonoše Mountains. Trees 21: 23-35.
34. Pretzsch H (2009) Forest dynamics, growth and yield. Springer, Berlin, p 664.
35. Raffa KF, Aukema BH, Bentz BJ, Carroll AL, Hicke JA, Turner MG, Romme WH (2008) Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: dynamics of biome-wide bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 58(6): 501-518.
36. Salemaa M, Jukola-Sulonen EL (1990) Vitality rating of Picea abies by defoliation class and other vigour indicators. Scand J For Res 5: 413-426.
37. Sandnes A, Solheim H (2002) Variation in tree size and resistance to Ceratocystis polonica in a monoclonal stand of Picea abies. Scand J For Res 17: 522-528.
38. Schlyter F, Anderbrant O (1989) Mass attack of trees by Ips typographus induced by sex-specific pheromone: a model of attack dynamics. Holarctic Ecol 12: 415-426.
39. Schopf R, Köhler U (1995) Untersuchungen zur Populationsdynamik der Fichtenborkenkäfer im Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald. In: Biberlriether, H. at al.: 25 Jahre auf dem Weg zum Naturwald. Passavia Druckerei GmbH, Passau, pp 88-109.
40. Smelko S (2000) Dendrometria (Vysokoškolská učebnica). Vydavatelstvo TU vo Zvolene, Zvolen.
41. Spathelf P (2003) Reconstruction of crown length of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and Silver fir (Abies alba Mill.)-technique, establishment of sample methods and application in forest growth analysis. Ann For Sci 60: 833-842.
42. Steele MJ, Yeoman MM, Coutts MP (1990) Developmental changes in Sitka Spruce as indices of physiological age. II. rooting of cuttings and callusing of needle explants. New Phytol 114(1): 111-120.
43. Stolina M (1976) Odolnostný potenciál porastov, ukazovatel' stupňa ich ohrozenosti hmyzími škodcami. Lesnictví. 22(2): 157-170.
44. Stolina M (1982) Ohrozenost' lesných porastov škodlivými činitel'mi v závislosti od rastových fáz. Lesnícky časopis 28(6): 439-456.
45. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for Windows. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, p 352.
46. Zolubas P (2003) Spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) risk based on individual tree parameters. In: Proccedings of IUFRO Kanazawa 2003 Forest insect population dynamics and host influences. pp 96-97.
47. Zolubas P, Negron J, Munson AS (2009) Modelling spruce bark beetle infestation probability. Baltic For 15(1): 23-28.