Model analysis of spatial patterns in mountain pine beetle outbreaks

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 236-255

  Logan, Jesse A ^a,b   White, Peter ^b   Bentz, Barbara J ^a,b   Powell, James A ^b  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; POPULATION MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

COLEOPTERA; SCOLYTIDAE;

EID: 0032100234     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1350     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Amman G. D. Mountain pine beetle brood production in relationship to thickness of lodgepole pine phloem. J. Econ. Ent. 65:1972;138-140.
2. Amman G. D. The biology, ecology and causes of outbreaks of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. Berrymanet al. 1978;. p. 39-53.
3. Amman G. D., Cole W. E. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. 1983;59.
4. Amman G. D., McGregor M. D., Cahill D. B., Klein W. H. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. 1977;19.
5. Allee W. C. Animal Aggregation, a Study on General Sociology. 1931;Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Barbouletos T., Knapp A., Gardner B., Mocettini P. USDA Forest Service. 1994.
7. Bentz B. J. Ecological adaptation of the mountain pine beetle to cold temperatures. Proceedings, IUFRO Conference, Scolytid bark beetles: behavior, population dynamics, and control of forest insects. 1995.
8. Bentz B. J., Logan J. A., Amman G. D. Temperature dependent development of mountain pine beetle and simulation of its phenology. Can. Entomol. 123:1991;1083-1094.
9. Bentz B. J., Logan J. A., Amman G. D. A critical assessment of risk classification systems for the mountain pine beetle. Forest Ecol. Manag. 61:1993;349-366.
10. Berryman A. A. Theoretical explanation of mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Environ. Entomol. 5:1976;1225-1233.
11. Berryman A. A. A synoptic model of lodgepole pine/mountain pine beetle interaction and its potential application in forest management. Berrymanet al. 1978;. p. 98-105.
12. Berryman A. A., Pienaar L. V. Simulation of interspecific competition and survival ofScolytus ventralis. Environ. Entomol. 2:1973;447-459.
13. Berryman A. A., Raffa K. F., Millstein J. A., Stenseth N. C. Interaction dynamics of bark beetle aggregation and conifer defense rates. OIKOS. 56:1989;256-263.
14. Berryman, A. A. Amman, G. D. Stark, R. W. 1978, Theory and practice of mountain pine beetle management in lodgepole pine forests, Symposium Proceedings: Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow.
15. Berryman A. A., Stenseth N. C., Wollkind D. J. Metastability in forest ecosystems infested by bark beetles. Res. Pop. Ecol. 26:1984;13-29.
16. Borden J. H., Ryker L. C., Chong L. J., Pierce H. D., Johnston B. D., Oehlschlager A. C. Response of mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae. Can. J. Forest Res. 17:1987;118-128.
17. Cole W. E. USDA Forest Service Res. Note INT-97. 1962.
18. Cole W. E. Competing risks analysis in mountain pine beetle dynamics. Res. Popul. Ecol. 15:1974;183-192.
19. Cole W. E. Some risks and causes of mortality in mountain pine beetle populations: a long-term analysis. Res. Popul. Ecol. 23:1981;116-144.
20. Cole W. E., Amman G. D. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. 1980;56.
21. Cole W. E., Amman G. D., Jensen C. E. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. 1985.
22. Conn J. E., Borden J. H., Scott B. E., Friskie L. M., Pierce H. D., Oehlschlager A. C. Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae. Can. J. Forestry Res. 13:1983;320-324.
23. Durrett R., Levin S. A. Stochastic spatial models: a users guide to ecological applications. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B. 343:1994;329-350.
24. Eckberg T. B., Schmid J. M., Mata S. A., Lundquist J. E. USDA-Forest Service Research Note. 1994.
25. Gara C. H., Geiszler D. R., Littke W. R. Primary attraction of the mountain pine beetle to lodgepole pine in Oregon. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 77:1984;333-334.
26. Geiszler D. R., Gara R. I. Mountain pine beetle attack dynamics in lodgepole pine. Berrymanet al. 1978;. p. 182-187.
27. Geiszler D. R., Gallucci V. F., Gara R. I. Modeling the dynamics of mountain pine beetle aggregation in a lodgepole pine stand. Oecologia (Berl.). 46:1980a;244-253.
28. Geiszler D. R., Gara R. I., Driver C. H., Gallucci V. F., Martin R. E. Fire, fungi, and beetle influences on a lodgepole pine ecosystem of south-central Oregon. Oecologia (Berl.). 46:1980b;239-243.
29. Gueron S., Levin S. A. Self-organization of front patterns in large wildebeest herds. J. Theor. Biol. 165:1993;541-552.
30. Hayes J. L., Strom B. L. 4-Allylanisole as an inhibitor of bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Aggregation. J. Econ. Entomol. 87:1995;1586-1594.
31. Hobson, K. R. 1995, Host compounds as semiochemicals for bark beetles, Applications of Semiochemicals for Management of Bark Beetle Infestations, S. M. SalomK. R. Hobson, USDA-Forest Service General Technical Report, INT-GTR-318.
32. Hughes P. R. Dendroctonus. Z. Agnew. Entomol. 73:1973;294-312.
33. Hunt D. W. A., Borden J. H. Terpene alcohol pheromone production byDendroctonus ponderosaeIps paraconfusus. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1989;1433-1463.
34. Kareiva P. Space: the final frontier for ecological theory. Ecology. 75:1994;1.
35. Lessard G., Hansen M., Eilers M. L. Annotated bibliography: mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. 1986;204.
36. Levin S. A. Patchiness in marine and terrestrial systems: from individual to populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 343:1994;99-103.
37. Logan, J. A. Bolstad, P. V. Bentz, B. J. Perkins, D. L. 1995, Assessing the effects of changing climate on mountain pine beetle dynamics, Proceedings, Interior west global climate workshop, R. W. Tinus, 92, 105, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, RM-262.
38. Lorio P. L. Environmental stress and whole-tree physiology. Schowalter T. D., Filip G. M. Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. 1993;81-101 Academic Press, San Diego.
39. Mahoney R. L. Lodgepole pine/mountain pine beetle risk classification methods and their application. Berrymanet al. 1978;. p. 106-1978.
40. McCambridge W. F. Nature of induced attacks by the black hills beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 60:1967;920-928.
41. Moeck H. A., Simmons C. S. Primary attraction of the mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk. Can. Entomol. 123:1991;299-304.
42. Nebeker T. E., Hodges J. D., Blanche C. A. Host response to bark beetle and pathogen colonization. Schowalter T. D., Filip G. M. Beetle Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. 1993;157-273 Academic Press, London.
43. Pitman G. B. Trans-verbenol and alpha-pinene: their utility in manipulation of the mountain pine beetle. J. Econ. Entomol. 64:1971;426-430.
44. Pitman G. B., Vite J. P., Kinzer G. W., Fentiman A. F. Bark beetle attractants: transverbenol isolated from Dendroctonus. Nature. 218:1968;168-169.
45. Powell J. A., Rose J. D. Local consequences of a global model for mountain pine beetle mass attack. Dyn. Stab. Syst. 1998.
46. Powell J. A., Logan J. A., Bentz B. J. Local projections for a global model of mountain pine beetle attacks. J. Theor. Biol. 179:1996;243-260.
47. Raffa K. F., Berryman A. A. A mechanistic computer model of mountain pine beetle populations interacting with lodgepole pine stands and its implications for forest managers. Forest Sci. 32:1986;789-805.
48. Rasmussen L. A. Emergence and attack behavior of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine. USDA Forest Service Research Note INT-297. 1980.
49. Roberts D. W. A dynamical systems perspective on vegetation theory. Vegetato. 69:1987;27-33.
50. Rudinsky J. A., Morgan M. E., Libbey L. M., Putnam T. B. Antiaggregative-rivalry pheromone of the mountain pine beetle, and a new arrestant of the southern pine beetle. Environ. Entomol. 3:1974;90-98.
51. Safranyik L. Effects of climate and weather on mountain pine beetle populations. Berryman A. A., Amman G. D., Stark R. W. Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests. 1978;77-89 University of IdahoSymposium Proceedings: Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station, Moscow.
52. Salom S. M., Stephen F. M., Thompson L. C. Development rates and a temperature- dependent model of pales weevil,Hylobius. Environ. Entomol. 16:1987;956-962.
53. Schenk J. A., Mahoney R. L., Adams D. L. A model for hazard rating lodgepole pine stands for mortality by mountain pine beetle. Forest Ecol. Manag. 3:1980;57-68.
54. Schmitz R. F. Understanding Scolytid problems in lodgepole pine forests: the need for an integrated approach. Payne T. L., Saarenmaa H. Integrated Control of Scolytid Bark Beetles: Proceedings, IUFRO Working Party and XVII International Congress of Entomology, Vancouver, BC. 1988;231-245 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
55. Shore T. L., Safranyik L. Susceptibility and risk rating systems for the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine stands. Forestry Canada Information Report. 1992.
56. Schowalter T. D., Filip G. M. Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests. 1993;Academic Press, San Diego.
57. Taubes G. Stanford's George Papanicolaou seeks order in turbulence. Sci. Watch. 6:1995;3-4.
58. Tkacz B. M, Schmitz R. F. Association of an endemic mountain pine beetle population with lodgepole pine infected by Armillaria root disease in Utah. USDA Forest Service Research Note INT-353. 1986.
59. Thompson A. J., Safranyik L., Shrimpton D. M., Whitney H. S. A theory of mountain pine beetle population response to weather-induced changes in host resistance. "Proceedings of an International Union of forest Research Organizations Conference: The role of the host in the population dynamics of forest insects," Canadian Forest Service and USDA Forest Service. 1985.
60. Turchin P. Population consequences of aggregative movement. J. Animal Ecol. 58:1989;75-100.
61. White, P. Powell, J. A. Phase transition from environmental determinism to dynamic determinism in mountain pine beetle attack, Bull. Math. Biol.
62. White, P. Powell, J. A. Spatial invasion of pine beetles into lodgepole forests: a numerical approach, Sci. Comp.