A system-evolutionary approach for innovation policy

The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy: An International Research Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 417-448

  Smits, Ruud ^a   Kuhlmann, Stefan ^b   Teubal, Morris ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890614511     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781849804424.00026     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2008a), ‘From direct support of business sector R&D/innovation to targeting venture capital/private equity: a catching-up innovation and technology policy life cycle perspective’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17 (1), 153-172.
2. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2008b), ‘Evolutionary targeting’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18 (2), 151-166.
3. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2006), ‘Creating venture capital industries which co-evolve with high tech clusters: insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective to the Israeli experience’, Research Policy, 35 (10), 1477-1498.
4. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2005), ‘Evolutionary innovation and high tech policy: what can we learn from Israel’s targeting of venture capital?’, Science, Technology and Economy Program, Working Paper Series STE-WP-25-2005, Samuel Neaman Institute, Science, March 2005, Haifa.
5. Avnimelech, G., Kenney, M. and Teubal, M. (2005), ‘The life cycle model for the creation of national venture capital industries: the US and Israeli experiences’, in E. Giulani, R. Rabellotd and M. van Dijk (eds), Clusters Facing Competition: The Importance of External Linkages, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
6. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2004a), ‘Venture capital: start up co-evolution and the emergence and development of Israel’s new high tech cluster - Part 1: macroeconomic & industry analysis’, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13 (1), 33-60.
7. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2004b), ‘Strength of market forces and the successful emergence of Israel’s venture capital industry: insights from a policy-led case of structural change’, Revue Economique, 55 (6), 1265-1300.
8. Becker, R. and Hellmann, T. (2002), ‘The genesis of venture capital: lessons from the German experience’, working paper, Stanford University, Stanford.
9. Bessant, J. and Rush, H. (1995), ‘Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer’, Research Policy, 24 (1), 97-114.
10. Bijker, W. (2001), ‘Understanding technological culture through a constructivist view of science, technology, and society’, in S. Cutdiffe and C. Mitcham (eds), Visions of STS: Counterpoints in Science, Technology, and Society, New York: State University of New York Press (Sunny Press), pp. 19-34.
11. Boon, W., Moors, E., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R. (2008), ‘Demand articulation in intermediary organisations: the case of orphan drugs in the Netherlands’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75 (5), 644-671.
12. Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A. and Saxenian, A. (2001), ‘Old economy inputs for new economy outputs: cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys’, Industrial Corporate Change, 10 (4), 835-860.
13. Breznitz, D. (2008), Innovation and the State: Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan and Ireland, New Haven, USA and London, UK: Yale University Press.
14. Bylinsky, G. (1976), The Innovation Millionaires: How They Succeed, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
15. Caplan, N. (1979), ‘The two communities theory and knowledge utilization’, American Behavioral Scientist, 22 (3), 459-470.
16. Carmell, A. and Fonteney, C. de (2004), ‘Israel’s silicon wadi’, in T. Bresnahan and A. Gambardella (eds), Building High Tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Edler, J., Joly, P.-B., Kuhlmann, S., et al. (2006), ‘Understanding fora of strategic intelligence for research and innovation, The PRIME Forum Research Project (Fraunhofer ISI), Karlsruhe.
18. Edler, J., Kuhlmann, S. and Smits, R. (2003), ‘New governance for innovation. The need for horizontal and systemic policy co-ordination’, report on a workshop of the Six Countries Programme - the Innovation Policy Network (Fraunhofer ISI, working papers Innovation System and Policy Analysis, 2003/2; ISSN 1612-1430), Karlsruhe.
19. Edquist, C. (ed.) (1997), Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London, UK and New York, USA: Pinter.
20. Elzen, B. and Wieczorek, A. (2005), ‘Transitions towards sustainability through system innovation’, Techno logical Forecasting and Social Change, 72 (6), 651-661.
21. Felt, U., Wynne, B., Callon, M., et al. (2007), ‘Taking European knowledge society seriously’, report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance (European Commission), Brussels.
22. Fiedler, M. and Hellmann, T. (2001), ‘Against all odds: the late but rapid development of the German venture capital industry’, Journal of Private Equity, 4 (4), 31-45.
23. Geels, F. and Schot, J. (2007), ‘Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways’, Research Policy, 36 (3), 399-417.
24. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., et al. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage Publishing.
25. Gompers, P. (1994), ‘The rise and fall of venture capital’, Business and Economic History, 23 (2), 1-26.
26. Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. (1999), The Venture Capital Cycle, Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK: MIT Press.
27. Guy, K. and Nauwelaers, C. (2003), ‘Benchmarking STI policies in Europe: in search of good practice’, The IPTS Report, no. 71, IPTS, Seville.
28. Hippel, E. von (1988), The Sources of Innovation, Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK: MIT Press.
29. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008), ‘Low-tech innovations’, Industry and Innovation, 15 (1), 19-43.
30. Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., Laestadius, S. and Smith, K. (2005), ‘Low and medium technology industries in the knowledge economy: the analytical issues’, in H. Hirsch-Kreinsen, D. Jacobson and S. Laestadius (eds), Low and Medium Technology Industries in the Knowledge Economy, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 11-30.
31. Imai, K., Nonaka, L. and Takeuchi, H. (1988), ‘Managing the new product development process: how Japanese firms learn and unlearn’, in K. Clark, R. Hayes and C. Lorenz (eds), The Uneasy Alliance: Managing the Productivity-Technology Dilemma, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 337-376.
32. Jacobsson, S, and Johnson, A. (2000), ‘The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research’, Energy Policy, 28 (9), 625-640.
33. Kemp, R., Schot, J. and Hoogma, R. (1998), ‘Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management’, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10 (2), 175-195.
34. Klepper, S. (2001), ‘Employee startups in high-tech industries’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (3), 639-674.
35. Klepper, S. (1996), ‘Entry, exit, growth and innovation over the product life cycle’, American Economic Review, 86 (3), 562-583.
36. Kline S. and Rosenberg, N. (1986), ‘An overview of innovation’, in R. Landau and N. Rosenberg (eds), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37. Kuhlmann, S. (2003), ‘Evaluation as a source of strategic intelligence’, in P Shapira and S. Kuhlmann (eds), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 352-379.
38. Kuhlmann, S., Boekholt, P., Georghiou, L., et al. (1999), ‘Enhancing distributed intelligence in complex innovation systems’, report published within the framework of the Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme of the European Commission, ISI-FhG, Karlsruhe.
39. Lundvall, B.-Å. (2007), ‘Post script: innovation system research. Where it came from and where it might go’, mimeo.
40. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, UK and New York, USA: Pinter.
41. Moors, E., Enzing, C., et al. (2003), ‘User-producer interactions in functional genomics innovations’, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 5 (2-3), 120-143.
42. Nelson, R. (1993), National Innovation Systems, Oxford, UK and New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
43. Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1977), ‘In search of a useful theory of innovation’, Research Policy, 6 (1), 36-76.
44. O’Doherty, D. and Arnold, K. (2003), ‘Understanding innovation: the need for a systemic approach’, The IPTS Report, no. 71, IPTS, Seville.
45. OECD (2003), ‘Venture capital policy reviews’, DSTI/DOC(2003), STI Working Paper 2003, Paris.
46. OECD (2002), Benchmarking Science-Industry Relationships, Paris: OECD Publishing.
47. OECD (1992), ‘Technology and the economy. The key relationships’, report of the Technology and Economy Programme, OECD, Paris.
48. Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (eds) (2003), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA and London, UK: MIT Press.
49. Rip, A. (2006), ‘A co-evolutionary approach to reflexive governance: and its ironies’, in J.-R Vofl, D. Bauknecht and R. Kemp (eds), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 82-100.
50. Rip, A. and Kemp, R. (1998), ‘Technological change’, in S. Rayner and L. Malone (eds), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 2, Washington, DC: Batelle Press, pp. 327-400
51. Rosenberg, N. (1982), Inside the Black Box. Technology and Economics, Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press,.
52. Rosenberg, N. (1976), Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Rosiello, A., Teubal, M. and Avnimelech, G. (2008), ‘Towards the framing of venture capital policies: a systems-evolutionary perspective with particular reference to the UK/Scotland and Israeli experience’, paper presented to the July, 2008 International Schumpeter Society Meeting, Rio de Janeiro.
54. Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
55. Sercovich, F. and Teubal, M. (2007), ‘Innovation, technological capability and competitiveness: the policy issues in evolutionary perspective’, typescript.
56. Sharif, N. (2006), ‘Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept’, Research Policy, 35 (5), 745-766.
57. Smith, K. (2000), ‘Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy, enterprise and innovation’, Management Studies, 1 (1), 73-102.
58. Smits, R. (2002b), ‘The new role of strategic intelligence’, in A. Tiibke, K. Ducatel, J. Gavigan and P. Moncada-Paterno-Castello (eds), ‘Strategic Policy Intelligence: current trends, the state of play and perspectives’, IPTS Technical Report Series, EUR 20137 EN, IPTS, Seville.
59. Smits, R. and Hertog, P. den (2007), ‘Technology assessment and the management of technology in economy and society’, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 3 (1), 28-52.
60. Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S. (2004), ‘The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy’, International Journal Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1 (1-2), 4-32.
61. Tassey, G. (2000), ‘Standardization in technology based markets’, Research Policy, 29(4), 587-602.
62. Teubal, M, (2002), ‘What is a Systems of Innovation (SI) perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy (ITP) and how can we apply it to developing and industrializing economies?’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12 (1), 233-257.
63. Teubal, M. (1997), ‘A catalytic and evolutionary approach to Horizontal Technology Policies (HTPs)’, Research Policy, 25 (8), 1161-1188.
64. Voß, J.-P. (2007), ‘Designs on governance. Development of policy instruments and dynamics in governance’, PhD dissertation (ISBN 978-90-365-2585-5), Enschede and Berlin.
65. Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D. and Kemp, R. (eds) (2006), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
66. Woolthuis, R. Klein, Lankhuizen, M. and Gilsing, V. (2005), A system failure framework for innovation policy design, Technovation, 25 (6), 609-619.