Demand articulation in intermediary organisations: The case of orphan drugs in the Netherlands

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 644-671

  Boon, Wouter P C ^a   Moors, Ellen H M ^a   Kuhlmann, Stefan ^a   Smits, Ruud E H M ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Demand articulation; Event history analysis; Intermediary organisations; Learning

Indexed keywords

DRUG PRODUCTS; HISTORY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

DEMAND ARTICULATION; EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS; INTERMEDIARY ORGANIZATIONS;

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DRUG; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LEARNING; TECHNOLOGY;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 44349088853     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Geels F.W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res. Policy 31 8/9 (2002) 1257-1274
2. Jelsma J. Bridging gaps between technology and behaviour: a heuristic exercise in the field of energy efficiency in households. In: Rohracher H. (Ed). User Involvement in Innovation Processes - Strategies and Limitations from a Socio-technical Perspective (2005), Profil, Munchen
3. Moors E., Enzing C., Van der Giessen A., and Smits R. User-producer interactions in functional genomics innovations. Innov. Manag. Policy Pract. 5 2-3 (2003) 120-143
4. Oudshoorn N., and Pinch T. How users and non-users matter. In: Oudshoorn N., and Pinch T. (Eds). How Users Matter - The Co-construction of Users and Technology (2003), The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
5. Rothwell R., Freeman C., Horlsey A., Jervis V.T.P., Robertson A.B., and Townsend J. SAPPHO updated-project SAPPHO phase II. Res. Policy 3 3 (1974) 258-291
6. Utterback J. The process of innovation: a study of the origin and development of ideas for new scientific instruments. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. EM18 4 (1971) 124-131
7. Von Hippel E. The Sources of Innovation (1988), Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. Smits R., and Den Hertog P. TA and the management of innovation in economy and society. Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy 3 1 (2007) 28-52
9. Lundvall B. User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. In: Lundvall B. (Ed). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (1992), Pinter Publishers, London
10. Smits R., Leyten A., and Hertog P.D. Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe: new concepts, new goals, new infrastructures. Policy Sci. 28 (1995) 272-299
11. Nelis A. DNA diagnostics in the Netherlands (original title: 'DNA-diagnostiek in Nederland') (1998), Twente University Press, Enschede
12. Koch L., and Stemerding D. The sociology of entrenchment: a cystic fibrosis test for everyone?. Soc. Sci. Med. 39 (1994) 1211-1220
13. Collingridge D. The Social Control of Technology (1981), Open University Press, Milton Keynes, England
14. Orihata M., and Watanabe C. The interaction between product concept and institutional inducement: a new driver of product innovation. Technovation 20 (2000) 11-23
15. Boon W. Research Proposal-Internal Document (Interview Results) (2005), Utrecht University, Utrecht
16. Weely S.V., and Leufkens H.G.M. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World: A "Public Health Approach to Innovation" (2004), Orphan diseases, WHO, Utrecht
17. Burt R.S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
18. Braun D., and Guston D.H. Principal-agent theory and research policy: an introduction. Sci. Public Policy 30 5 (2003) 302-308
19. Khurana R. Market triads: a theoretical and empirical analysis of market intermediation. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 32 2 (2002) 239-262
20. Edquist C. Systems of Innovations. Technologies, Institutions and Organization (1997), Pinter, London
21. Van Lente H., Hekkert M., Smits R., and Van Waveren B. Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 7 3 (2003) 1-33
22. Fernandez R.M., and Gould R.V. A dilemma of state power: brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. Am. J. Sociol. 99 6 (1994) 1455-1491
23. Van Lente H. Positioning work of intermediary organizations in science and technology, PRIME workshop "Intermediaries organisation and processes: theory and research issues" (2005), Enschede
24. Bunders J.F.G., Broerse J.E.W., and Zweekhorst M.B.M. The Triple Helix enriched with the user perspective: a view from Bangladesh. J. Technol. Transf. 24 (1999) 235-246
25. Geurts J. Omkijken naar de toekomst, lange termijn verkenningen in beleidsexercities (Looking Back to the Future, Long-term Foresight Studies in Policy Exercises) - Address Tilburg University (1993), Samson H.D. Tjeenk Willink, Tilburg
26. Howells J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Res. Policy 35 (2006) 715-728
27. Borup M., Brown N., Konrad K., and Lente H.V. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 18 3/4 (2006) 285-298
28. Grin J. Vision assessment to support shaping 21st century society? Technology assessment as a tool for political judgement. In: Grin J., and Grunwald A. (Eds). Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society - Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment (1999), Springer, Berlin
29. Argyris C., and Schön D.A. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (1978), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts
30. Hoogma R. Exploiting Technological Niches (2000), Twente University, Twente
31. Kerkhof M.V.D., and Wieczorek A. Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: methodological considerations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 72 (2005) 733-747
32. Leeuwis C., Van Mierlo B., Smits R., and Woolthuis R.K. Innovation Systems and Social Learning: Linking the Meso And the Micro Level (2005), NIDO
33. Grin J., and Van de Graaf H. Technology assessment as learning. Sci. Technol. Human Values 21 1 (1996) 72-99
34. Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), University of Chicago Press, Chigago
35. Garud R., and Rappa M.A. A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: the case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5 3 (1994) 344-362
36. Van Lente H. Role Finding and Positioning Theory: How Intermediary Organizations Operate in Innovation Systems, ASEAT Conference (2003) (Manchester, UK)
37. Grin J., Van de Graaf H., and Hoppe R. Technology Assessment Through Interaction: A Guide (1997), SDU, Den Haag
38. Mayer I.S. Debating Technologies - A Methodological Contribution to the Design and Evaluation of Participatory Policy Analysis (1997), Tilburg University Press, Tilburg
39. Van de Ven A.H., and Engleman R.M. Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Venturing 19 (2004) 343-358
40. Poole M.S., Van de Ven A.H., Dooley K., and Holmes M.E. Organizational Change and Innovation Processes (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
41. Van Merkerk R., and Smits R. Tailoring CTA for emerging technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (2007) 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.003