Standardization in technology-based markets

Research Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 4-5, 2000, Pages 587-602

  Tassey, Gregory ^a  

^a Natl Inst for Std/Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic growth; Industry structure; Innovation; R D; Standardization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001525538     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00091-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Electronics Association, 1997. Cybernation. The American Electronics Association, Washington, DC.
2. Arthur W.B. Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Business Review. 74:1996;100-109.
3. Brunnermeier, S., Martin, S., 1999. Interoperability cost analysis of the U.S. automobile supply chain. NIST Planning Report 99-1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
4. Cotrell T. Fragmented standards and the development of Japan's microcomputer software industry. Research Policy. 23:1994;143-174.
5. David, P.A., 1987. Some new standards for the economics of standardization in the information age. In: Dasgupta, P., Stoneman, P.L. (Eds.), The Economic Theory of Technology Policy. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.
6. David P.A., Greenstein S. The economics of compatibility standards: an introduction to recent research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 1:1990;3-41.
7. David P.A., Steinmueller W.E. Economics of compatibility standards and competition in telecommunications networks. Information Economics and Policy. 6:1994;217-241.
8. Department of Commerce, 1998. The Emerging Digital Economy. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, April.
9. Finan, W., 1997. Metrology-related costs in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1990, 1996 and 2001 (Planning Report 98-4). Technecon Analytic Research. Prepared for the Program Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC, May.
10. Germon, C., 1986. La normalisation, cle d'un nouvel essor, la documentation francais. Report to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD, Paris.
11. Kahaner D. TRON (the real time operating system nucleus). Scientific Information Bulletin. 16(3):1991;11-19.
12. Kahin, B., Abbate, J. (Eds.), 1995. Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Link A.N., Scott J.T. Assessing the infrastructural needs of a technology-based services sector: a new approach to technology policy planning. STI Review. 22:1998;171-207.
14. Link, A.N., Tassey, G., 1987. Strategies for Technology-Based Competition. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
15. Morris C.R., Ferguson C.H. How architecture wins the technology wars. Harvard Business Review. 71:1993;86-96.
16. Putnam, Hayes, Bartlett, 1982. The Impact of Private Voluntary Standards on Industrial Innovation, Vol. 2. The National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD.
17. Schumpeter, J., 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Happer and Row, New York.
18. Tassey G. The role of government in supporting measurement standards for high-technology industries. Research Policy. 11:1982;311-320.
19. Tassey, G., 1992. Technology Infrastructure and Competition Position. Kluwer, Norwell, MA.
20. Tassey, G., 1997. The Economics of R&D Policy. Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
21. Tassey, G., 1999. R&D trends in the U.S. economy: strategies and policy implications. Planning Report 99-2. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
22. Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy. 24:1995;419-440.
23. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1992. Global Standards: Building Blocks for the Future (TCT-512). US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.