From direct support of business sector r&d/innovation to targeting venture capital/private equity: A catching-up innovation and technology policy life cycle perspective

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 153-172

  Avnimelech, G ^a   Teubal, M ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Innovation and technology policy; Knowledge based entrepreneurship; Venture capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149175134     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438590701279417     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Almor, T. and Hashai, N. (2003) Competitive Advantage and Strategic Configuration of Knowledge-Intensive, 'Born Global'Firms:AModified Resource BasedView, European International BusinessAcademyAnnual Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, December.
2. Avnimelech, G. (2004) An Industrial Life Cycle Model of Venture Capital Industries: An Analysis of the Israeli Case with reference to other Countries, MA Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
3. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal,M. (2003) EvolutionaryVenture Capital Policies: Insights favnimelechavaaAvroma Product Life Cycle Analysis of Israel's Venture Capital Industry, Neaman Institute, Technion, Science, Technology, Economy program (STE-WP-11-03).
4. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2004a),Venture Capital-Start Up Co-evolution and the Emergence and Development of Israel's New High Tech Cluster-Part 1: Macroeconomic & Industry Analysis, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(1), 33-60.
5. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2004b) Venture Capital Policy in Israel: A Comparative Analysis & Lessons for Other Countries, forthcoming in Sunil, M. and Bartzokas, A. (eds.) Financial System, Corporate Investment in Innovation and Venture Capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
6. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2004c) Strength of Market Forces and the Successful Emergence of Israel's Venture Capital Industry: Insights from a Policy-led Case of Structural Change. Revue Economique, 55(8), 1265-1300.
7. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2005a) The Emergence ofIsrael'sVenture Capital Industry: How Policy can Influence Cluster Dynamics. In Braunerhjelm, P. and Feldman, M. (eds.) Cluster Genesis: Technology-Based Industrial Development. New-York: Oxford University Press.
8. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2005b) From Direct Government Support of Innovative SMEs to Targeting Venture Capital/Private Equity:An Innovation and Technology Policy (ITP) Cycle Model for Industrializing Economies, paper presented at the Beijing Globelics Conference.
9. Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2005d) Evolutionary Innovation and High Tech Policy: What can We Learn from Israel's Targeting ofVenture Capital? Neaman Institute, Technion, Science, Technology and Economy program, STE-WP25.
10. Becker, R. and Hellmann, T. (2002) The Genesis ofVenture Capital: Lessons from the German Experience, typescript.
11. Black, B. and Gilson, R. (1998) Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks versus Stock Markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 47(3), 243-277.
12. Black, B. and Gilson, R. (1999) Does Venture Capital Require an Active Stock Market?, typescript.
13. Dahlman, K. and Andersson, T. (2001) Korean and the Knowledge-based Economy: Making the Transition, Paris: OECD and World Bank Institute.
14. Gilson, R. (2003) Engineering a Venture Capital Market: Lessons from the American Experience. Stanford Law Review, 55(4), 1067-110.
15. Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. (1999) The Venture Capital Cycle. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
16. Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. (2001) TheVenture Capital Revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2), 145-168 IVA 1997-2003 Yearbooks, A survey of Venture Capital and Private equity in Israel, edited by IVC.
17. Justman, M. and Teubal, M. (1986) Innovation Policy in an Open Economy: Tactical and Strategy Aspects. Research Policy, 15(3), 121-138.
18. Kim, L. (1997) From Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Kim, L. (2000) Korea's National System of Innovation in Transition. In Kim, L. and Nelson, R. (eds.) Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Kim, L. and Nelson, R. (2000)Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly IndustrializingEconomies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Krugman, P. (1983) Targeted Industrial Policies: Theory and Evidence, typescript.
22. Lerner, J. (2002) When Bureaucrats Meet Entrepreneurs: The Design of Effective 'Public Venture Capital' Programs. The Economic Journal, 112 (February), 73-84.
23. Lipsey, R and Carlaw, K. (1997) Technological Policies in Neoclassical and Structuralist-Evolutionary Models, typescript.
24. Lundvall, B. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
25. Metcalfe, S. (1995) The Economics Foundations of Technology Policy: Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspective, Ch. 11 in Stoneman, P. (ed) Handbook of Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford UK and Cambridge USA: Basil Blackwell.
26. Nelson, R.R. (1993) National Systems of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
27. Nelson, R.R. (1994) The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure and Supporting Institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47-63.
28. Nelson, R.R. (2002) Social Technologies, typescript.
29. OECD (1996) Venture Capital and Innovation, OCDE/GD(96)168, Paris.
30. OECD (1997) Government Venture Capital for Technology Based Firms, OCDE/GD(97)201, Paris.
31. OECD (2000) The Internationalization of Venture Capital Activity inOECD Countries: Implications for Measurement and Policy, DSTI/DOC(2000), December.
32. OECD (2002) A Comparison of Venture Capital Policies and Programs in Selected OECD Countries, Paris.
33. OECD (2003a) Venture Capital Policy Review: United Kingdom, DSTI/DOC(2003)1, STI Working Paper 2003/1, Industry Issues.
34. OECD (2003b) Venture Capital Policy Review: Korea, DSTI/DOC(2003)2, STI Working Paper 2003/2, Industry Issues.
35. OECD (2003c) Venture Capital Policy Review: Canada. DSTI/DOC(2003)4, STI Working Paper 2003/4, Industry Issues.
36. OECD (2003d) Venture Capital Policy Review: Israel. DSTI/DOC(2003)3, STI Working Paper 2003/3, Industry Issues.
37. Perez, C. (2002) Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
38. Saxenian, A.L. (1998) Regional Development: Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
39. Suh, J. (2000) Korea's Innovation System: Challenges and New Policy Agenda, Discussion Paper, United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, WP 2000-2004.
40. Teubal, M. (1993) The Innovation System of Israel: Description, Performance and Outstanding Issues. In Nelson, R. (ed.) National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford and NewYork: Oxford University Press.
41. Teubal, M. (1996) R&D and Technology Policy at NICs as Learning Processes.World Development, 24(3), 449-460.
42. Teubal, M. (1997) A Catalytic and Evolutionary Approach to Horizontal Technological Policies. Research Policy, 25(8), 1161-1188.
43. Teubal, M. (2002) What is the Systems of Innovation (SI) Perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy (ITP) and How Can We Apply it to Developing and Industrialized Economies? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1), 233-257.
44. Teubal, M. and Andersen, E. (2000) Enterprise Restructuring and Embeddedness:A Policy and Systems Perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1), 87-111.
45. Yla-Antilla, P. and Lemolla, T. (2003) Transformationof Innovation System in a Small Country - The Case of Finland, typescript.
46. Zollo,M.and Winter, S. (2002) Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities.Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.