The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 891-908

  Brescoll, Victoria L ^a   Uhlmann, Eric Luis ^b   Newman, George E ^a  

^a YALE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (United States)

^b HEC PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

Biological essentialism; Essentialism; Gender; Stereotyping; System justification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATION; POLICY; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEXISM; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; POLITICS; PUBLIC POLICY; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXISM; SOCIAL JUSTICE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84890033220     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0034701     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Aarts, H., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Hassin, R. R. (2004). Goal contagion: Perceiving is for pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 23-37. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.23
2. Alper, J. S., & Beckwith, J. (1993). Genetic fatalism and social policy: The implications of behavior genetics research. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 66, 511-524.
3. Atran, S. (1987). Origins of the species and genus concepts. Journal of the History of Biology, 20, 195-279. doi:10.1007/BF00138437
4. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253-285). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotyping endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228-235. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003
6. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories and its theories on women. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
8. Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes' baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York, NY: Basic Books.
9. Brescoll, V. L. (2005). Biology is not always destiny: Media coverage of the causes of gender differences. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.
10. Brescoll, V. L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 622-641. doi:10.1177/0001839212439994
11. Brescoll, V. L., Dawson, E., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2010). Hard won and easily lost: The fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations. Psychological Science, 21, 1640-1642. doi:10.1177/ 0956797610384744
12. Brescoll, V. L., & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on gender differences. Psychological Science, 15, 515-520. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00712.x
13. Brescoll, V. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Gender, status conferral, and workplace emotion expression. Psychological Science, 19, 268-275.
14. Bubela, T. M., & Caulfield, T. A. (2004). Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170, 1399-1407. doi:10.1503/cmaj.1030762
15. Clarke, E. H. (1873). Sex in education or a fair chance for the girls. Boston, MA: James R. Osgood.
16. Conrad, P. (1997). Public eyes and private genes: Historical frames, news constructions, and social problems. Social Problems, 44, 139-154. doi: 10.2307/3096939
17. Cutright, K. M., Wu, E. C., Banfield, J. C., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2011). When your world must be defended: Choosing products to justify the system. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 62-77. doi: 10.1086/658469
18. Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 800-818. doi:10.1037/a0021860
19. Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105
20. Dunning, D., & Cohen, G. L. (1992). Egocentric definitions of traits and abilities in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 341-355. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.341
21. Dunning, D., Leuenberger, A., & Sherman, D. A. (1995). A new look at motivated inference: Are self-serving theories of success a product of motivational forces? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 58-68. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.58
22. Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382-394. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382
23. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York, NY: Basic Books.
24. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001
25. Gil-White, F. J. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological "species" to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories. Current Anthropology, 42, 515-553. doi:10.1086/321802
26. Greenwald, A. G., & Ronis, D. L. (1978). Twenty years of cognitive dissonance: Case study of the evolution of a theory. Psychological Review, 85, 53-57. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.1.53
27. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Rodgers, J. S. (2004). Perceiving the groupness of groups: Entitativity, homogeneity, essentialism, and stereotypes. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 39-60). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127. doi:10.1348/014466600164363
29. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2004). Essentialism and entitativity: Structures of beliefs about the ontology of social categories. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 61-78). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
30. Haslam, N., & Whelan, J. (2008). Human natures: Psychological essentialism in thinking about differences between people. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1297-1312. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004 .2008.00112.x
31. Hinshaw, S. P., & Stier, A. (2008). Stigma as related to mental disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 367-393. doi:10.1146/annurev .clinpsy.4.022007.141245
32. Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.). (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain-specificity in cognition and culture. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752902
33. Jayaratne, T. E., Ybarra, O., Sheldon, J. P., Brown, T. N., Feldbaum, M., Pfeffer, C. A., & Petty, E. M. (2006). White Americans' genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward Blacks, and gay men and lesbians. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 77-94. doi:10.1177/ 1368430206059863
34. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in systemjustification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
35. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
36. Jost, J. T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2005). Stereotypes in our culture. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty Years After Allport (pp. 208-224). Oxford, England: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470773963.ch13
37. Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305-333. doi:10.1007/s11211-005-6827-z
38. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36. doi:10.1002/ ejsp.127
39. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Friesen, J., Laurin, K., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to view what is as what should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421-434. doi:10.1037/a0015997
40. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x
41. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686-702. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686
43. Knobe, J., Prasada, S., & Newman, E. (2013). Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognition, 127, 242-257. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005
44. Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636-647. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636
45. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
46. Lanie, A. D., Jayaratne, T. E., Sheldon, J. P., Kardia, S. L. R., Anderson, E. S., Feldbaum, M., & Petty, E. M. (2004). Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13, 305-320. doi:10.1023/B:JOGC.0000035524.66944.6d
47. Levy, S., Stroessner, S., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
48. McCauley, C., & Thangavelu, I. L. (1991). Individual differences in strength of sex-occupation stereotyping: Reliability, validity, and some correlates. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 267-279. doi:10.2307/ 2786655
49. McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472-488. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.472
50. Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical learning (pp. 179-195). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511529863.009
51. Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Hornsey, M. J. (2009). Theorizing gender in the face of social change: Is there anything essential about essentialism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 653-664. doi:10.1037/a0012966
52. Newman, G. E., & Keil, F. C. (2008). Where is the essence? Developmental shifts in children's beliefs about internal features. Child Development, 79, 1344-1356. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01192.x
53. Norenzayan, A., & Heine, S. J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 763-784. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.763
54. Norton, M. I., Vandello, J. A., & Darley, J. M. (2004). Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 817-831. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.817
55. Plaks, J. E., Levy, S. R., Dweck, C. S., & Stroessner, S. J. (2004). In the eye of the beholder: Lay theories and the perception of group entitativity, variability, and essence. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 127-146). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
56. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645. doi:10.1037/ 0022-3514.74.3.629
57. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1004
58. Russett, C. E. (1989). Sexual science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Sayers, J. (1982). Biological politics: Feminist and anti-feminist perspectives. New York, NY: Methuen.
60. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
61. Shostak, S., Freese, J., Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2009). The politics of the gene: Social status and beliefs about genetics for individual outcomes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 77-93. doi:10.1177/ 019027250907200107
62. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139175043
63. Simon, D. (2004). A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. University of Chicago Law Review, 71, 511-586.
64. Simon, D., Krawczyk, D., Bleicher, A., & Holyoak, K. (2008). The transience of constructed preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 1-14. doi:10.1002/bdm.575
65. Sober, E. (1994). Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism. In E. Sober (Ed.), Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology (2nd ed., pp. 161-190). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Sousa, P., Atran, S., & Medin, D. L. (2002). Essentialism and folkbiology: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 195-223. doi:10.1163/15685370260225099
67. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
68. Tiger, L. (1970). Men in groups. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
69. Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, G. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16, 474-480.
70. Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Varieties of unconscious social cognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 293-322. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00372.x
71. Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 476-491.
72. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
73. Waxman, S., Medin, D., & Ross, N. (2007). Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: Early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 43, 294-308. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.294
74. Weisstein, N. (1982, November). Tired of arguing about biological inferiority. Ms. Magazine.
75. Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797-826. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.797
76. Williams, M. J.,&Eberhardt, J. L. (2008). Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1033-1047. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1033
77. Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 141-155. doi:10.1207/ S15327957PSPR0502_5
78. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rocher, S. J., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subject essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). Oxford, England: Blackwell.