White Americans' genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward blacks, and gay men and lesbians

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 77-94

  Jayaratne, Toby Epstein ^a   Ybarra, Oscar ^a   Sheldon, Jane P ^b   Brown, Tony N ^c   Feldbaum, Merle ^a   Pfeffer, Carla A ^a   Petty, Elizabeth M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic explanations; Lay theories; Race; Sexual orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 31344472103     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206059863     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA. Addison-Wesley.
2. Anderson, N. B., & Nickerson, K. J. (2005). Genes, race, and psychology in the genome era [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 60.
3. Andrews, L. B. (1999). Predicting and punishing antisocial acts: How the criminal justice system might use behavioral genetics. In R. A. Carson & M. A. Rothstein (Eds.), Behavioral genetics. The clash of culture and biology (pp. 116-155). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Black, E. (2003). War against the weak: Eugenics and America's campaign to create a master race. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.
5. Bobo, L., & Kluegel, J. R. (1993). Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes? American Sociological Review, 58, 443-464.
6. Bobo, L., & Smith, R. A. (1998). From Jim Crow racism to laissez-faire racism: The transformation of racial attitudes in America. In W. Katkin, N. Landsman, & A. Tyree (Eds.), Beyond pluralism: Essays on the conception of groups and group identities in America (pp. 182-220). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
7. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
8. Born gay. (1993, July 26). Time, p. 36.
9. Brescoll, V., & LaFrance, M. (2004). The correlates and consequences of newspaper reports of research on sex differences. Psychological Science, 15, 515-520.
10. Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y., & Fu, J. H. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923-940.
11. Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1999). Social identification in a political transition: The role of implicit beliefs. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 297-318.
12. Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E., & Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature, 422, 835-847.
13. Conrad, P. (1997). Public eyes and private genes: Historical frames, news constructions, and social problems. Social Problems, 44, 139-154.
14. Conrad, P., & Markens, S. (2001). Constructing the 'gay gene' in the news: Optimism and skepticism in the US and British press. Health, 5, 373-400.
15. Duckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger.
16. Dweck, C. S., Chin, C., & Hong, Y. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.
17. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322-333.
18. Ellis, L. (1998). The evolution of attitudes about social stratification: Why many people (including social scientists) are morally outraged by The Bell Curve. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 207-216.
19. Entine, J. (2000). Taboo: My black athletes dominate sports and why we are afraid to talk about it. New York: Public Affairs.
20. Ernulf, K. E., Innala S. M., & Whitam, F. L. (1989). Biological explanation, psychological explanation, and tolerance of homosexuals: A cross-national analysis of beliefs and attitudes. Psychological Reports, 65, 1003-1010.
21. Focus on the Family (2004). Homosexuality. Retrieved October 30, 2004, from http://www.family.org
22. Galton, F. (1892/1972). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
23. Gelman, D. (1992, February 24). Born or bred? Newsweek, p. 46.
24. Gelman, S. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton.
26. Graham, S. (1995). Implicit theories as conceptualized by an attribution researcher. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 294-297.
27. Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105-1118.
28. Hamer, D. H., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., Hu, N., & Pattatucci, A. M. L. (1993). A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation. Science, 261, 321-327.
29. Haslam, N., & Levy, S. R. (in press). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
30. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127.
31. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87-100.
32. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2004). Essentialism and entitativity: Structure of beliefs about the ontology of social categories. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M., Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception (pp. 61-78). New York: Psychology Press.
33. Hegarty, P. (2002). 'It's not a choice, it's the way we're built': Symbolic beliefs about sexual orientation in the US and Britain. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 153-166.
34. Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. (2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 723-735.
35. Hong, Y., Levy, S. R., & Chiu, C. (Eds.). (2001). Lay theories and their role in the perception of social groups [Special issue]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2).
36. Hubbard, R., & Wald, E. (1997). Exploding the gene myth: How genetic information is produced and manipulated by scientists, physicians, employers, insurance companies, educators, and law enforcers. Boston: Beacon Press.
37. Human Rights Campaign (2003, October 20). HRC welcomes scientific study exploring genetic basis of sexual orientation and gender identity (press release). http://www.hrc.org/Content/ContentGroups/News_Releases
38. Jayaratne, T. E. (2002). White and Black Americans' genetic explanations for perceived gender, class, and race differences: The psychology of genetic beliefs. Invited lecture at the 2002 Human Genome Lecture Series, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
39. Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686-702.
40. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Kircher, P. (1997). The lives to come: The genetic revolution and human possibilities. New York: Touchstone.
42. Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 181-197.
43. Lerner, R. M. (1992). Final solutions: Biology, prejudice, and genocide. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
44. Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., Hong, Y., Chiu, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Static versus dynamic theories and the perception of groups: Different routes to different destinations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 156-168.
45. Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436.
46. Martin, C. L., & Parker, S. (1995) Folk theories about sex and race differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 45-57.
47. McConahay, J. B., & Hough, J. C. (1976). Modern racism. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 23-45.
48. Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M. S. (1995). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. New York: Freeman.
49. Niccol, A. (Director). (1997). Gattaca [Motion picture]. United States: Columbia Pictures.
50. Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75.
51. Plaks, J. E., Levy, S. R., Dweck, C. S., & Stroessner, S.J. (2004). In the eye of the beholder: Lay theories and the perception of group entitativity, variability, and essence. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception (pp. 127-146). New York: Psychology Press.
52. Rice, G., Anderson, C., Risch, N., & Ebers, G. (1999). Male homosexuality: Absence of linkage to microsatellite markers at Sq28. Science, 284, 571.
53. Ridley, M. (1999). Genome: The autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. New York: Harper Collins.
54. Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. R. S. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11-36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55. Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294.
56. Sakalli, N. (2002). Application of the attribution-value model of prejudice to homosexuality. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 264-271.
57. Scott, J. (1993, December 8). The latest parenting debate. The Los Angeles Times, pp. E1, E6.
58. Sheldon, J. P., Pfeffer, C. A., Jayaratne, T. E., Feldbaum, M., & Petty, E. M. (in press). Beliefs about the etiology of homosexuality and about the ramifications of discovering its possible genetic origin. Journal of Homosexuality.
59. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. Smedley, A., & Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real. American Psychologist, 60, 16-26.
61. Stein, E. (1999). The mismeasure of desire: The science, theory and ethics of sexual orientation. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Tygart, C. E. (2000). Genetic causation attribution and public support of gay rights. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 259-275.
63. Verkuyten, M. (2003). Discourses about ethnic group (de-)essentialism: Oppressive and progressive aspects. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 371-391.
64. Watson, T., & Shapiro, J. P. (1995, November 13). Is there a 'gay gene'? U.S. News and World Report, pp. 93-96.
65. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
66. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
67. Yang, A. S. (1997). The polls-trends: Attitudes toward homosexuality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 477-507.
68. Yzerbyt, V., Estrada, C., Corneille, O., Seron, E., & Demoulin, S. (2004). Subjective essentialism in action: Self-anchoring and social control as consequences of fundamental social divides. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception (pp. 101-124). New York: Psychology Press.
69. Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (2004). Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism: Introduction and overview. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception (pp. 1-22). New York: Psychology Press.
70. Yzerbyt, V., & Rogier, A. (2001). Blame it on the group: Entitativity, subjective essentialism, and social attribution. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 103-134). New York: Cambridge University Press.