Skeletal stem cells and controlled nanotopography

Stem Cell Engineering: Principles and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 247-258

  Dalby, Matthew J ^a   Oreffo, Richard O C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Filopodia; Mechanotransduction; Mesenchymal stem cell; Nanobioscience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889955943     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11865-4_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Vieu C, Carcenac F, Pepin A, Chen Y, Mejias M, Lebib A, et al. Electron beam lithography: resolution limits and applications. Appl Surf Sci. 2000;164:111-117.
2. Wilkinson CD. Making structures for cell engineering. Eur Cell Mater. 2004 Oct; 22(8):21-26.
3. Wilkinson CDW, Riehle M, Wood M, Gallagher J, Curtis ASG. The use of materials patterned on a nano-and micro-metric scale in cellular engineering. Mater Sci Eng. 2002;19:263-269.
4. Andersson AS, Backhed F, Von Euler A, Richter-Dahlfors A, Sutherland D, Kasemo B. Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. Biomaterials. 2003 Sep; 24(20):3427-3436.
5. Andersson AS, Brink J, Lidberg U, Sutherland DS. Influence of systematically varied nanoscale topography on the morphology of epithelial cells. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci. 2003;2(2):49-57.
6. Andersson AS, Olsson P, Lidberg U, Sutherland D. The effects of continuous and discontinuous groove edges on cell shape and alignment. Exp Cell Res. 2003 Aug. 1;288(1):177-188.
7. Denis FA, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS, Dufrene YF. Fabrication of nanostructured polymer surfaces using colloidal lithography and spin coating. Nanoletters. 2002;2:1419-1425.
8. Denis FA, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS, Gold J, Mustin C, Rouxhet PG, et al. Protein adsorption on model surfaces with controlled nanotopography and chemistry. Langmuir. 2002;18(3):819-828.
9. Affrossman S, Henn G, O'Neill SA, Pethrick RA, Stamm M. Surface topography and composition of deuterated polystyrene - poly (bromostyrene) blends. Macromolecules. 1996;29(14):5010-5016.
10. Affrossman S, Jerome R, O'Neill SA, Schmitt T, Stamm M. Surface structure of thin film blends of polystyrene and poly (n-butyl methacrylate). Colloid Polym Sci. 2000;278:993-999.
11. Affrossman S, O'Neill SA, Stamm M. Topography and surface composition of thin films of blends of polystyrene with brominated polystyrenes: effects of varying the degree of bromination and annealing. Macromolecules. 1998;31:6280-6288.
12. Affrossman S, Stamm M. The effect of molecular weight on the topography of thin films of blends of poly (4-bromostyrene) and polystyrene. Colloid Polym Sci. 2000;278:888-893.
13. Bianco P, Riminucci M, Gronthos S, Robey PG. Bone marrow stromal stem cells: nature, biology, and potential applications. Stem Cells. 2001;19(3):180-192.
14. Bianco P, Robey PG. Stem cells in tissue engineering. Nature. 2001;414:118-121.
15. Oreffo ROC. Growth factors for skeletal reconstruction and fracture repair. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2004;5(4):419-423.
16. Tare RS, Babister JC, Kanczler J, Oreffo RO. Skeletal stem cells: phenotype, biology and environmental niches informing tissue regeneration. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2008 Jun. 25;288(1-2):11-21.
17. Dawson JI, Oreffo RO. Bridging the regeneration gap: stem cells, biomaterials and clinical translation in bone tissue engineering. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008 May 15;473(2):124-131.
18. Yang X, Tare RS, Partridge KA, Roach HI, Clarke NM, Howdle SM, et al. Induction of human osteoprogenitor chemotaxis, proliferation, differentiation, and bone formation by osteoblast stimulating factor-1/pleiotrophin: osteoconductive biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Jan; 18(1):47-57.
19. Rose FR, Oreffo RO. Bone tissue engineering: hope vs hype. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002 Apr. 22;292(1):1-7.
20. Triffitt JT, Oreffo RO. Osteoblast lineage. In: Zaidi M, ed. Advances in organ biology: molecular and cellular biology of bone. Stamford: JAI Press; 1998, pp. 475-498.
21. Friedenstein AJ. Precursor cells of mechanocytes. Int Rev Cytol. 1976;47:327-359.
22. Mirmalek-Sani SH, Roach HI, Wilson DI, Hanley NA, Oreffo ROC. Characterisation of human fetal populations: a comparative model for skeletal and stem cell differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1292.
23. Locklin RM, Oreffo RO, Triffitt JT. Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in human skeletal cells in vitro by 5-azacytidine. Cell Biol Int. 1998;22(3):207-215.
24. Oreffo RO, Bord S, Triffitt JT. Skeletal progenitor cells and ageing human populations. Clin Sci (Lond). 1998 Jun; 94(5):549-555.
25. Oreffo RO, Triffitt JT. Future potentials for using osteogenic stem cells and biomaterials in orthopedics. Bone. 1999 Aug; 25(2 Suppl):5S-9S.
26. Gustafson T, Wolpert L. Studies on the cellular basis of morphogenesis in the sea urchin embryo. Directed movements of primary mesenchyme cells in normal and vegetalized larvae. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Jun; 24:64-79.
27. Clark P, Connolly P, Curtis AS, Dow JA, Wilkinson CD. Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1991 May; 99(Pt 1):73-77.
28. Wojciak-Stothard B, Madeja Z, Korohoda W, Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Activation of macrophage-like cells by multiple grooved substrata - topographical control of cell behavior. Cell Biol Int. 1995;19:485-490.
29. Rajnicek A, McCaig C. Guidance of CNS growth cones by substratum grooves and ridges: effects of inhibitors of the cytoskeleton, calcium channels and signal transduction pathways. J Cell Sci. 1997 Dec; 110(Pt 23):2915-2924.
30. Rajnicek A, Britland S, McCaig C. Contact guidance of CNS neurites on grooved quartz: influence of groove dimensions, neuronal age and cell type. J Cell Sci. 1997 Dec; 110(Pt 23):2905-2913.
31. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using SEM to image the interaction between 10 nm high nano-topography and fibroblast filopodia. Cell Biol Int. 2004;28(3):229-236.
32. Schmitz AA, Govek EE, Bottner B, Van Aelst L. Rho GTPases: signaling, migration, and invasion. Exp Cell Res. 2000 Nov. 25;261(1):1-12.
33. Jones GE, Allen WE, Ridley AJ. The Rho GTPases in macrophage motility and chemotaxis. Cell Adhes Commun. 1998;6(2-3):237-245.
34. Hart A, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC, Dalby MJ. Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Jun; 18(6):1211-1218. Epub 2007 Feb. 3.
35. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, Agheli H, Sutherland D, Affrossman S, et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials. 2006 May; 27(15):2980-2987.
36. Dalby MJ. Cellular response to low adhesion nanotopographies. Int J Nanomed. 2007;2(3):373-381.
37. Gallagher JO, McGhee KF, Wilkinson CDW, Riehle MO. Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci. 2002;1(1):24-28.
38. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Riehle MO, Wilkinson CD, Curtis AS. Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004 Oct; 36(10):2015-2025.
39. Dalby MJ, Biggs MJP, Gadegaard N, Kalna G, Wilkinson CDW, Curtis ASG. Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning. J Cell Biochem. 2007;100(2):326-338.
40. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, McMurray RJ, Affrossman S, Wilkinson CD, et al. Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Sep. 23;91(1):195-208.
41. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CD, Dalby MJ. Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: Characterization and quantification of S-phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates. J Orthop Res. 2007 Feb; 25(2):273-282.
42. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Watson J. Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland; 1994.
43. Cooper GM. Cell. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2000.
44. Burridge K, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M. Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996;12:463-518.
45. Amos LA, Amos WB. Molecules of the cytoskeleton. London: MacMillan; 1991.
46. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2002 Jul; 23(14):2945-2954.
47. Dalby MJ, Childs S, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJ, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. Biomaterials. 2003 Mar; 24(6):927-935.
48. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJ, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. Tissue Eng. 2002 Dec; 8(6):1099-1108.
49. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, Wilkinson CDW, Oreffo ROC. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1306-1315.
50. Wang N, Suo Z. Long-distance propagation of forces in a cell. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 Mar. 25;328(4):1133-1138.
51. Forgacs G. On the possible role of cytoskeletal filamentous networks in intracellular signaling: an approach based on percolation. J Cell Sci. 1995 Jun; 108(Pt 6):2131-2143.
52. Ingber DE, Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks. J Cell Sci. 2003 Apr. 15;116(Pt 8):1397-1408.
53. Ingber DE, Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci. 2003 Apr. 1;116(Pt 7):1157-1173.
54. Ingber DE. Mechanosensation through integrins: cells act locally but think globally. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003 Feb. 18;100(4):1472-1474.
55. Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997 Feb. 4;94(3):849-854.
56. Maniotis AJ, Bojanowski K, Ingber DE. Mechanical continuity and reversible chromosome disassembly within intact genomes removed from living cells. J Cell Biochem. 1997 Apr; 65(1):114-130.
57. Ingber DE. Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci. 1993 Mar; 104(Pt 3):613-627.
58. Charras GT, Horton MA. Single cell mechanotransduction and its modulation analyzed by atomic force microscope indentation. Biophys J. 2002 Jun; 82(6):2970-2981.
59. Dalby MJ. Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27(9):730-742.
60. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis AS. Use of nanotopography to study mechanotransduction in fibroblasts-methods and perspectives. Eur J Cell Biol. 2004 May; 83(4):159-169.
61. Heslop-Harrison JS. Comparative genome organization in plants: from sequence and markers to chromatin and chromosomes. Plant Cell. 2000 May; 12(5):617-636.
62. Heslop-Harrison JS, Leitch AR, Schwarzacher T. The physical organisation of interphase nuclei. In: Heslop-Harrison JS, Flavell RB, eds. The chromosome. Oxford: Bios; 1993, pp. 221-232.
63. Mosgoller W, Leitch AR, Brown JK, Heslop-Harrison JS. Chromosome arrangements in human fibroblasts at mitosis. Hum Genet. 1991 Nov; 88(1):27-33.
64. Foster HA, Bridger JM. The genome and the nucleus: a marriage made by evolution. Genome organisation and nuclear architecture. Chromosoma. 2005 Sep; 114(4):212-229.
65. Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr; 2(4):292-301.
66. Osborne CS, Chakalova L, Brown KE, Carter D, Horton A, Debrand E, et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat Genet. 2004 Oct; 36(10):1065-1071.
67. Bustamante C, Bryant Z, Smith SB. Ten years of tension: single-molecule DNA mechanics. Nature. 2003 Jan 23;421(6921):423-427.
68. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Herzyk P, Sutheraland DS, Agheli H, Wilkinson CDW, et al. Nanomechanotransduction and interphase nuclear organisation influence on genomic control. J Cell Biochem. 2007;102:1234-1244.
69. Curtis ASG, Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N. Cell signaling arising from nanotopography: implications for nanomedical devices. Nanomedicine. 2006;1(1):67-72.
70. Curtis ASG, Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N. Nanoimprinting onto cells. J R Soc Interface. 2006;3:393-398.
71. Dalby MJ, Berry CC, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis AS. Attempted endocytosis of nano-environment produced by colloidal lithography by human fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 2004 May 1;295(2):387-394.
72. Wood MA, Bagnaninchi P, Dalby MJ. The beta integrins and cytoskeletal nanoimprinting. Exp Cell Res. 2008 Feb. 15;314(4):927-935.
73. Balasundaram G, Webster TJ. Nanotechnology and biomaterials for orthopaedic medical applications. Nanomedicine. 2006;1(2):169-176.
74. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, McFarlane S, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ. Adhesion formation of primary human osteoblasts and the functional response of mesenchymal stem cells to 330 nm deep microgrooves. J R Soc Interface. 2008 Mar; 5(27):1231-1242.
75. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater. 2007 Dec; 6(12):997-1003.
76. Getzenberg RH. Nuclear matrix and the regulation of gene expression: tissue specificity. J Cell Biochem. 1994 May; 55(1):22-31.
77. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006 Aug. 25;126(4):677-689.
78. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell. 2004 Apr; 6(4):483-495.
79. Shafrir Y, Forgacs G. Mechanotransduction through the cytoskeleton. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002 Mar; 282(3):C479-C486.