Rationale-based software engineering

Rationale-Based Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-316

  Burge, Janet E ^a   Carroll, John M ^b   McCall, Raymond ^c   Mistrik, Ivan ^d  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d Independent Consultant   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; DECISION MAKING; SOFTWARE TESTING;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DESIGN RATIONALE; QUALITY OF SOFTWARES; REQUIREMENTS DEFINITION; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLES;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84889788824     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77583-6     Document Type: Book

References (424)

1. Abbattista F, Lanubile F, Mastelloni G, Visaggio G (1994) An experiment on the effect of design recording on impact analysis. In: Müller A, Georges A (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE Computer Society, pp 253-259
2. Agrawal H, Horgan JR (1990) Dynamic program slicing. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1990 Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, White Plains, New York, pp 246-256
3. Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M, King I, Angel S, Jacobson M (1977) A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Alford, MW, Lawson JT (1979) Software Requirements Engineering Methodology (Development). RADC-TR-79-168, US Air Force, Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AFB, New York, NY
5. Ali-Babar M, Gorton I, Kitchenham BA (2006) A framework for supporting architecture knowledge and rationale management. In: Dutoit AH, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering. Springer, pp 237-254
6. Ali-Babar M, Gorton I (2007) A tool for managing software architecture knowledge, In: the Workshop on the Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge at the International Conference on Software Engineering, Minnesota.
7. Ambler SW (1998) Software Process Patterns, Cambridge University Press and Reasoning (KR2002). pp 375-384
8. Andréka H, Ryan M, Schobbens PY (2002) Operators and laws for combining preference relations. J Logic Comput 12(1):13-53
9. ANSI/IEEE (1987) ANSI/IEEE Standard for Software Unit Testing, ANSI/IEEE Std 1008-1987
10. Antón AI, Dempster JH, Siege DF (2000) Deriving goals from a use case based requirements specification for an electronic commerce system. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ), Stockholm, Sweden, pp 10-19
11. Antón AI, Potts C (2001) Functional paleontology: system evolution as the user sees it. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, Canada, pp 421-430
12. Antón, AI, Potts C (1998) The use of goals to surface requirements for evolving systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th international Conference on Software Engineering. pp 157-166.
13. Antoniol G, Canfora G, De Lucia A, Casazza G (2000) Information retrieval models for recovering traceability links between code and documentation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance. pp 40-51
14. Arrow KJ (1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn, Wiley, New York
15. th International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering, Singapore, pp 180-189
16. Baker ER (2001) Which way, SQA?. IEEE Softw 18(1):16-18
17. Bañares-Alcántara R, King MP, Ballinger G (1995) Egide: a design support system for conceptual chemical process design. In: AI System Support for Conceptual Design: Proc. of the 1995 Lancaster International Workshop on Engineering Design, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 138-152
18. Baniassad E L A, Murphy GC, Schwanninger C (2003) Design pattern rationale graphs: Linking design to source. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2005), May 3-10, pp 352-362
19. nd edn. Addison-Wesley, NY
20. Bass L, Clements P, Nord RL, Stafford J (2006) Capturing and using rationale for a software architecture. In: Dutoit AH, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer, pp 255-272
21. Beck K (1999) Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Addison-Wesley, NY
22. Beck K (2002) Test-Driven Development: By Example, Addison-Wesley, NY
23. Beck K, Andres C (2005) Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd edn, Addison Wesley, Boston
24. Bennett KH, Rajlich VT (2000) Software maintenance and evolution: A roadmap. In: Finkelstein, A (ed) The Future of Software Engineering, 22nd ICSE. Limerick, Ireland, pp 73-87
25. th International Conference on Software Engineering, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp 85-103
26. Biggerstaff TJ, Mitbander BG, Webster D (1993) The concept assignment problem in program understanding. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering. Baltimore, Maryland, pp 482-498
27. Blackorby C, Donaldson D, Mongin P (2000) Social aggregation without the expected-utility hypothesis. UBC Department of Economics Discussion Paper no. 00-18
28. Blevins D (2001) Overview of the Enterprise JavaBeans component model. In: Councill B, Heineman G (eds) Component-based Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, pp 589-606
29. Boehm B (1979) Software engineering: R&D trends and defence needs. Research Direction in Software Technology, Wegner P. (ed) MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 1-9
30. Boehm B (1986) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. In: ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 11(4):22-42
31. Boehm B (2006a) A view of 20th and 21st century software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 28th international Conference on Software Engineering, Shanghai, China, pp 12-29
32. Boehm B (2006b) Value-based software engineering: overview and agenda. In: Biffl S, Arum A, Boehm B, Erdogmus H, Grunbacher P (eds) Value-Based Software Engineering, Springer, pp 3-14
33. rd International Conference on the Software Process, Reston, VA, pp 59-68
34. Boehm B, Bose P, Horowitz E, Lee MJ (1995) Software requirements negotiation and renegotiation aids. In: Proceedings of the 17th international Conference on Software Engineering. Seattle, Washington, pp 128-142
35. Boehm B, Brown J, Kaspar H, Lipow M, MacLeod G, Merrit M (1979) Characteristics of Software Quality. TRW Series of Software Technology vol 1. North-Holland
36. Boehm B, Egyed A (1998) Software requirements negotiation: some lessons learned. In: Proceedings of the 20th international Conference on Software Engineering. Kyoto, Japan, IEEE Computer Society, pp 503-506
37. Boehm B, In H (1996) Identifying quality-requirement conflicts. IEEE Software. 13(2):25-35
38. Boehm B, Kitapci H (2006) The WinWin approach: using a requirements negotiation tool for rationale capture and use. In: Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer, pp 173-190
39. Boehm B, Ross R (1989) Theory W software project management: principles and examples. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 15(7):902-916
40. Boehm BW, Brown JR, Lipow M (1976) Quantitative evaluation of software quality. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering. San Francisco, California, pp 592-605
41. Boehm B, Bose P, Horowitz E, Lee MJ (1995) Software requirements negotiation and renegotiation aids: A Theory-W based spiral approach. In: Proceedings ICSE-17 (International Conference on Software Engineering), pp 243-253 IEEE Computer Society
42. Bohner SA, Arnold RS (1996) An introduction to software change impact analysis. In: Bohner SA, Arnold RS (eds) Software Change Impact Analysis. IEEE Computer Society, pp 1-28
43. Booth R (2002) Social contraction and belief negotiation. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2002), pp 375-384
44. st European Workshop Software Architecture (EWSA 04), Springer, pp 194-199
45. th Conference on Knowledge Based Software Engineering. Boston, MA, pp 105-113
46. Bose P (1998) Change analysis in an architectural model: A design rationale based approach. In: Proceedings ISAW3 (International Software Architecture Workshop), Orlando, Florida, pp 5-8
47. Bozheva T, Gallo M (2006) Defining Agile Patterns. In: Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer, pp 373-390
48. Brooks FP (1995) The mythical man-month. Anniversary Edition, 2nd edn Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
49. Bruegge B, Dutoit AH (2004) Object-Oriented Software Engineering Using UML, Patterns, and Java. 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, NJ
50. Bruegge B, Dutoit A (2000) Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Conquering Complex and Changing Systems, Prentice Hall, NJ
51. th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, Sheffield, UK, July 2007. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 4604:29-44.
52. Buckingham Shum S, Hammond N (1994) Argumentation-based design rationale: What use at what cost? Int J of Human-Computer Studies, 40(4), 603-652
53. Buckingham Shum S, MacLean A, Bellotti V M E, Hammond NV (1997) Graphical Argumentation and Design Cognition, Human-Comput Interact. 12(3):267-300
54. Buckingham Shum S, Selvin AM, Sierhuis M, Conklin EJ, Haley CB, Nuseibeh B (2006) Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale: 15 years on from gIBIS and QOC. In: AH, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, pp 111-132
55. Budgen D (2003) Software design, 2nd edn Addison-Wesley, Harlow, England
56. Burge J, Brown DC (2002) Integrating design rationale with a process model, In: Workshop on Design Process Modeling. Artificial Intelligence in Design'02. Cambridge, UK
57. Burge JE (2005) Software Engineering Using design RATionale. Ph. D. thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
58. Burge JE, Brown DC (2000) Inferencing over design rationale. In: Artificial Intelligence in Design'00, Gero J (ed) Kluwer Academic, pp 611-629
59. Burge JE, Brown DC (2006) Rationale-based support for software maintenance. In: Dutoit AH, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer, Germany, pp 273-296
60. Burge JE, Brown DC (2007) Supporting requirements traceability with rationale, GTC'07: International Symposium on Grand Challenges in Traceability, March 2007, Slade, KY
61. Burge JE, Brown DC (2003) Rationale support for maintenance of large scale systems. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Evolution of Large-Scale Industrial Software Applications (ELISA), ICSM'03, Amsterdam, Netherlands
62. Burge JE, Brown DC (2004) An integrated approach for software design checking using rationale. In: Design Computing and Cognition'04, Gero J (ed) Kluwer Academic, pp 557-576
63. Burge JE, Cross V, Kiper J, Maynard-Zhang P, Cornford S (2006) Enhanced design checking involving constraints, collaboration, and assumptions. In: Gero J (ed) Proceedings of the Conference on Design, Computing, and Cognition. Eindhoven Netherlands, pp 655-674
64. Burnstein I (2003). Practical Software Testing, Springer Professional Computing
65. Canfora G, Casazza G, De Lucia A (2000) A Design rationale based environment for cooperative maintenance. Int J Soft Eng Know Eng 10(5):627-645
66. Canfora G, Cerulo L (2006) Fine grained indexing of software repositories to support impact analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, Shanghai, China, pp 105-111
67. Capilla R, Nava F, Duenas JC (2007) Modeling and documenting the evolution of architectural design decisions. In: the Proceedings of the Workshop on Sharing and Reusing Archtectural Knowledge at the International Conference of Software Engineering (ICSE), Minneapolis, Minnesota
68. Capilla R, Nava F, Pérez S, Dueñas JC (2006) A web-based tool for managing architectural design decisions. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Sharing and Reusing Architectural Knowledge. ACM Digital Library. Softw Eng Notes 31 (5)
69. Carroll J (2000) Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interaction, MIT press, Cambridge, MA
70. Carroll J, Rosson MB (1996) Deliberated evolution: stalking the View Matcher in design space. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds) Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 107-145
71. Carroll JM, Rosson M (1992) Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Trans Infor Syst 10(2):181-212
72. Carroll JM, Rosson MB, Chin G Jr, Koenemann J (1998) Requirements development in scenario-based design. IEEE Trans Soft Eng. 24(12):1156-1170
73. Carroll JM, Mack, RL (1985) Metaphor, computing systems, and active learning. Int J of Man-Machine Stud, 22:39-58
74. Carroll JM (1995) Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development. New York: Wiley
75. Carroll JM, Alpert SR, Karat J, Van Deusen, MD, Rosson MB (1994) Capturing design history and rationale in multimedia narratives. In: Proceedings of CHI'94: Human Factors in Computing Systems. Boston. New York: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, pp 192-197
76. Carroll JM, Rosson MB, Convertino G, Ganoe C (2006) Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interac Comput, 18:21-46
77. Chaib-Draa B, Dignum F (2002) Trends in agent communications language. Comput Intel, 18(2):89-101
78. Chapin N (2000) Software maintenance types-a fresh view. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, San Jose, CA, pp 247-252
79. Charette RN (1996) Large-scale project management is risk management. IEEE Soft 13(4):110-117
80. Chaudron M R V, Groote JF, Van Hee KM, Hemerik C, Somers L J A M, Verhoeff T (2004) Software Engineering Reference Framework. Technical Report CS-Report 04-039, Computer Science Reports, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
81. Chernak Y (2001) Validating and improving test-case effectiveness. IEEE Soft 18(1):81-86
82. Chewar CM, Bachetti E, McCrickard DS, Booker J (2005) Automating a design reuse facility with critical parameters: lessons learned in developing the LINK-UP System. In: Jacob R, Limbourg Q, Vanderderonckt J (eds) Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces IV. Kluwer Academic, pp 235-246
83. Chung L, Nixon B, Yu E (1996) Dealing with change: an approach using nonfunctional requirements. Requirements Eng 1(4):238-260
84. Chung L, Nixon BA (1995) Dealing with non functional requirements: three experimental studies of a process-oriented approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 25-37
85. Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E, Mylopoulos J (2000) Non-functional requirements in software engineering, Kluwer Academic
86. Chung L, Yu E (1998) Achieving system-wide architectural qualities. In: Proceedings of the OMG-DARPAMCC Workshop on Compositional Software Architectures
87. Cimitile A, Lanubile F, Visaggio G (1992) Traceability based on design decisions. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Software Maintenance, Orlando, Florida, pp 309-317
88. Clapp J (1993) Getting started on software metrics. IEEE Soft 10(1):189-109, 117
89. Clark A (1987) From folk psychology to naïve psychology. Cogn Sci 11:139-154
90. Cleland-Huang J, Settimi R, Ben Khadra O, Berezhan E, Christina S (2005) Goal centric traceability for managing non-functional requirements. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, St Louis, pp 362-371
91. Clemen RT, Reilly T (2001) Making Hard Decisions. Duxbury, Forest Grove, CA
92. Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1999) Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis, Risk Analy 19:187-203
93. Clements P, Bachmann, Bass L, Garlan, Ivers J, Little R, Nord R, Stafford J (2002) Documenting software architecture: Views and beyond, Addison-Wesley
94. Clements P, Northrop L (2002) Software Product Lines Practices and Patterns, Addison-Wesley
95. CMMI Product Team (2006) CMMI For Development. Version 1.2. CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008
96. CMU (2002) Quality measures taxonomy http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/ taxonomies/view-qm.html
97. Coleman JS (1990) The Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
98. Conklin EJ, Burgess-Yakemovic KC (1996) A process-oriented approach to design rationale. In: Moran T, Carroll J (eds) Design Rationale Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 393-427
99. Conklin J, Begeman M (1988) gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion, ACM Trans on Office Inform Syst, 6(4):303-331
100. Conklin J, Burgess-Yakemovic K (1995) A process-oriented approach to design rationale. In: Design rationale concepts, techniques, and use, Moran T, Carroll J (eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 293-428
101. Conklin J, Burgess-Yakemovic K (1991) A process-oriented approach to design rationale, Human-Computer Interaction, 6:357-291
102. Connolly T, Jessup L, Valacich J (1990) Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Manage Sci 36(6):689-703
103. Councill B, Heineman G (2001) Definition of a software component and its elements. In: Councill B, Heineman G (eds) Component-Based Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, pp 5-20
104. Crosby ME, Scholtz J, Wiedenbeck S (2002) The roles beacons play in comprehension for novice and expert programmers. In: Kuljis K, Baldwin L, Scoble R (eds) Proceedings of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Brunel University, pp 58-73
105. Cross N (2003) Evidence from protocol and other formal studies of design activity. In: Eastman C, McCracken M, Newstetter W (eds), Knowing and Learning to Design: Cognitive Perspectives in Design Education, Amsterdam: Elsevier
106. Curtis B, Krasner H, Iscoe N (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun ACM 31(11):1268-1287
107. Cysneiros LM, Leite J C S P (2001) Using UML to reflect non-functional requirements. In: Proceedings of the 11th CASCON, November, IBM Canada, Toronto, pp 202-216
108. Cysneiros LM, Leite J C S P (2004) Nonfunctional requirements: from elicitation to conceptual models. IEEE Trans on Softw Eng, 30(5):328-350
109. Darimont R, Delor E, Massonet P, Van Lamsweerde A (1997) GRAIL/KAOS: an environment for goal-driven requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering. ACM, New York, NY, pp 612-613
110. De Boer RC, Farenhorst R, Clerc V, Van Der Ven JS, Lago P, Van Vliet H (2006) A model for structuring software architecture project memories, In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Learning Software Organizations
111. De Grace P, Stahl LH (1998) Wicked problems, righteous solutions: a catalogue of software engineering paradigms, Yourdon
112. De Kleer J (1986) An assumption-based truth maintenance system. Artif Intell 28(2):127-162
113. De La Garza J, Alcantara P (1997) Using parameter dependency network to represent design rationale. J Comput Civil Eng 2(2):102-112
114. De Marco T, Lister TR (1999) Peopleware: Productive projects and teams, 2nd edn, New York: Dorset House
115. Demeyer S, Ducasse S, Nierstrasz O (2003) Object-Oriented Reengineering Patterns, Morgan Kaufmann
116. Department of Defense (2002) Mandatory Procedures for Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPS) and Major Automated Information System (MAIS), DoD 5000.2-R
117. Devanbu P, Brachman R, Selfridge P, Ballard B (1991) Lassie: a knowledgebased software information system. In: Commun ACM 34(5):34-49
118. Dick J (2005) Design traceability. IEEE Softw 22(6):14-16
119. Dijkstra EW (1972) The humble programmer. Communications of the ACM 15(10):859-866
120. Dijsktra EW (1989) On the cruelty of really teaching computer science. Commun ACM 32(12):1398-1404
121. Do H, Rothermel G, Kinneer A (2006) Prioritizing JUnit test cases: An empirical assessment and cost-benefits analysis. Empir Softw Eng 11:33-70
122. Domeshek E, Kolodner JL (1996) The Designers' Muse: Providing Experience to Aid Conceptual Design of Complex Artifacts. In Maher ML and Pu P (eds), Issues and Applications of Case-Based Reasoning to Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, pp 11-38
123. Doyle J (1979) A truth maintenance system. Artif Intell 12(3):231-272
124. Druffel LE, Buxton JN (1980) Requirements for an Ada programming support environment: Rationale for Stoneman, In: Proceedings COMPSAC Chicago, pp 66-72
125. Dutoit AH, Paech B (2000) Supporting Evolution: Using Rationale in Use Case Driven Software Development, Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ'2000), Stockholm, Sweden
126. Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (eds) (2006a) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg
127. Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (2006b) Rationale management in software engineering: Concepts and techniques. In: Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer-Verlag, pp 1-48
128. Egyed A, Grunbacher P (2004) Identifying requirements conflicts and cooperation: How quality attributes and automated traceability can help. IEEE Software. 21(6):50-58
129. EIA (1998) Electronic Industries Alliance. Systems Engineering Capability Model (EIA/IS-731). Washington, DC
130. Eick S (1998) Maintenance of large systems. In: Stasko J, Dominigue J, Brown M, Price B (eds) Software Visualization: Programming as a Multimedia Experience. The MIT Press, pp 315-328
131. Eickelmann NS, Ruffolo F, Baik J, Anant A (2002) An Empirical Study of Modifying the Fagan Inspection Process and the Resulting Main Effects and Interaction Effects Among Defects Found, Effort Required, Rate of Preparation and Inspection, Number of Team Members and Product 1st Pass Quality. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual NASA Goddard Software Engineering Workshop (Sew-27'02), pp 58-64
132. Erdogmus H, Favaro J, Halling M (2006) Valuation of software initiatives under uncertainty: concepts, issues, and techniques. In: Biffl S, Aurum A, Boehm B, Erdogmus H, Grunbacher P (eds) Value-Based Software Engineering, Springer, pp 39-66
133. Ewald T (2001) Overview of COM+, In: Councill B, Heineman G (eds) Component-based Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, pp 573-588
134. Fabian A, Wahid S, Bhatia S, McCrickard DS (2006) Creating an Interactive Learning Environment with Reusable HCI Knowledge. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia/Hypermedia and Educational Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA'06), Orlando FL, June, pp 2314-2322
135. Falessi D, Beker M, Cantone G (2006) Design decision rationale: experiences and steps ahead towards systematic use. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Sharing and Reuse of Architectural Knowledge, Torino, Italy
136. Favaro J (1996) When the pursuit of quality destroys value. IEEE Soft 13(3):93-95
137. Filman RE (1998) Achieving ilities. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Compositional Software Architectures, Monterey, CA, USA
138. Finkelstein A, Kramer J (2000) Software engineering: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, ICSE 2000, Limerick, Ireland, pp 3-22
139. Finkelstein AC, Gabbay D, Hunter A, Kramer J, Nuseibeh B (1994) Inconsistency handling in multiperspective specifications. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 20(8):569-578
140. Fischer G, Morch A (1988) CRACK: A critiquing approach to cooperative kitchen design. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Montreal, Canada), ACM Press, New York, pp 176-185
141. Fischer G, Henninger S, Redmiles D (1991) Cognitive tools for locating and comprehending software objects for reuse. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, Austin, Texas, pp 318-328
142. Fischer G, Lemke A, McCall R, Morch A (1996) Making argumentation serve design. In: Moran T, Carroll J (eds) Design Rationale Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 267-294
143. Fischer G, McCall R, Morch A (1989) JANUS: Integrating hypertext with a knowledge-based design. In: Proceedings of Hypertext'89, pp 105-117
144. Fisher R, Ury W (1981) Getting to Yes. Houghton-Mifflin
145. Fitzpatrick G (2003) The locales framework: understanding and designing for wicked problems. Fitzpatrick G, Series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol 1, Springer Verlag, New York
146. Fowler M, Beck K, Brant J, Opdyke W, Roberts D (1999) Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, Addison-Wesley
147. Fowler M (2003) UML distilled, 3rd edn, New York: Addison-Wesley.
148. Fox J, Das S (2000) Safe and Sound Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications, AAAI Press
149. France RB, Ghosh S, Dinh-Trong T, Solberg A (2006) Model-driven development using UML 2.0: Promises and pitfalls. Computer 39(2):59-66
150. Frankl P, Hamlet D, Littlewood B, Strigini L (1997) Choosing a testing method to deliver reliability. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, pp 68-78
151. Fuggetta A (2000) Software process: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, pp 25-34
152. Gallagher KB, Lyle JR (1991) Using program slicing in software maintenance. In: IEEE Trans Softw Eng 17(8):751-761
153. Gamma E, Helm R, Johnson R, Vlissides J (1995) Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
154. Gannod G, Burge J, Urban S (2007) Issues in the design of flexible and dynamic service-oriented systems. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Systems Development in SOA Environments. Co-located with ICSE, Minneapolis, MN.
155. Gibson VR, Senn JA (1989) System structure and software maintenance performance. Commun ACM 32(3):347-358
156. Gilboa I, Samet D, Schmeidler D (2004) Utilitarian aggregation of beliefs and tastes. J Polit Econ 112(4):932-938
157. Godfrey M, Tu Q (2002) Tracking structural evolution using origin analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, Orlando, Florida, pp 117-119
158. Goldenson DR, Gibson DL (2003) Demonstrating the impact and benefits of CMMI: an update and preliminary results. CMU/SEI-2003-SR-009
159. rd International Workshop on Software Architecture, Orlando, Florida, pp 45-48
160. Gotel O, Finkelstein A (1994) An analysis of the requirements traceability problem. In: Proceedings of the 1st Int. Conf. on Requirements Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 94-101
161. Gruber TR, Russell DM (1996) Generative design rationale: beyond the record and reply paradigm, In: Moran T, Carroll J (eds) Design Rationale Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 323-349
162. Grudin J (1988) Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. Proceedings of the CSCW'88 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, New York, pp 85-93
163. Grudin J (1996) Evaluating opportunities for design capture In: Moran T, Carroll J (eds) Design Rationale Concepts, Techniques, and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 453-470
164. Grudin J (1994) Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Commun ACM 37(1):92-105
165. Grünbacher P, Boehm B (2001) EasyWinWin: a groupware-supported methodology for requirements negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Software Engineering Conference. Vienna, Austria, ACM Press, pp 320-321
166. Grundy J, Hosking J, Mugridge R (1998) Inconsistency management for multipleview software development environments. In: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 24(11):960-981
167. Guindon R (1990) Knowledge Exploited by Experts During Software System Design, Int J Man-Machine Stud 33:279-304
168. Hagge L, Houdek F, Lappe K, Paech B (2006) Using patterns for sharing requirements engineering process rationales. In: Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer, pp 409-426
169. Hall T, Rainer A, Baddoo N, Beecham S (2001) An empirical study of maintenance issues within process improvement programmes in the software industry. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Software Maintenance. Florence, Italy, pp 422-430
170. Harrold MJ (2000) Testing: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering. Limerick, Ireland, pp 61-72
171. Harsanyi J (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal coparisions of utility. J Polit Econ 63:309-321
172. Hayes JH, Dekhtyar A, Sundaram SK (2005) Improving after-the-fact tracing and mapping: supporting software quality predictions. IEEE Softw 22(6):30-37
173. Haynes, S (2006) Three studies of design rationale as explanation, Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 53-71
174. Herbsleb JD (1999) Metaphorical representation in collaborative software engineering. ACM Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration Conference: WACC 99. San Francisco, New York: ACM, pp 117-126
175. Hild M, Jeffrey R, Risse M (1998) Preference aggregation after Harsanyi. In: Salles M, Weymark J (eds) Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
176. Hirsch M (2002) Making RUP agile. In: OOPSLA 2002 Practitioners Reports, Seattle, Washington, ACM, New York, NY
177. Hofmann HF, Lehner F (2001) Requirements engineering as a success factor in software projects. IEEE Softw 18(4):58-66
178. Hordijk W, Wieringa R (2006) Reusable rationale blocks: improving quality and efficiency of design choices. In: Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale management in software engineering, Springer, pp 353-371
179. Hudlicka E (1997) Summary of knowledge elicitation techniques for requirements analysis. Course Material for Human Computer Interaction, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
180. Hull MC, Jackson K, Dick J (2002) Requirements Engineering. Springer-Verlag. London, UK
181. Humphrey W (1995) A Discipline for Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
182. Humphrey W (2000) The Personal Software Process. CMU/SEI-2000-TR-022
183. IEEE (1990) IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology. IEEE Std 610.12-1990
184. IEEE (1993) IEEE Std 610.12-1990. IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. IEEE
185. IEEE (1998) IEEE Standard for Software Maintenance. IEEE Std 1219-1998
186. IEEE (2000) IEEE Std 1471-2000. Recommended Practice for Architectural Descriptions of Software-Intensive Systems, IEEE
187. IEEE (2004a) Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) 2004 edn, IEEE
188. IEEE (2004b) IEEE standard for software verification and validation. IEEE Std 1012-2004
189. IEEE/EIA (1996) Software life cycle processes. ISO/IEC 12207.0-1996
190. Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J (1999) The Unified Software Development Process, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co
191. th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2007), Nagoya, Japan, 5-7 December 2007, IEEE Computer Society
192. Jensen RW, Tonies CC (1979) Software Engineering. Prentice Hall, NJ
193. Jung H, Kim S, Chung C (2004) Measuring software product quality: a survey of ISO/IEC 9126. IEEE Softw, 21(5):88-92
194. Juristo N, Moreno AM, Strigel W (2006) Guest editors' introduction: Software testing practices in industry. IEEE Softw 23(4):19-21
195. Kahn H (1962) Thinking about the unthinkable, New York: Horizon
196. Kahneman D, Tversky A (2000) Choices, Values, and Frames, New York: Cambridge University Press
197. Kajiko-Mattsson M (2001) The state of documentation practice within corrective maintenance. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp 354-363
198. Karacapilidis N, Papadias D (2001) Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system. Inform Syst, 26(4):259-277
199. Karat J, Carroll JM, Alpert SR, Rosson MB (1995) Evaluating a multimedia history system as support for collaborative design. In: Nordby K, Helmersen P, Gilmore D, Arnesen S (eds) Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT'95 Lillehammer, Norway, London: Chapman and Hall, pp 346-353
200. Karau SJ, Williams KD (1993) Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J Personality Soc Psychol 65(4):681-706
201. Karlsson J, Ryan K (1997) A cost-value approach to prioritizing requirements. IEEE Softw 14(5):67-74
202. Kazman R, Asundi J, Klein M (2003) Quantifying the value of architecture design decisions: lessons from the field, Proceedings ICSE-25 (International Conference on Software Engineering), Portland, OR: IEEE Computer Society, pp 557-562
203. Kelly T, Littman J (2001) Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America's Leading Design Firm. New York: Doubleday
204. @ Kimelman D, Rosenburg B, Roth T (1998) Visualization of dynamics in real world software systems. In: Stasko J, Dominigue J, Brown M, Price B (eds) Software Visualization: Programming as a Multimedia Experience. The MIT Press, pp 293-314
205. King J M P, Bañares-Alcántara R (1997) Extending the scope and use of design rationale records. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 11:155-167
206. Kirschner PA, Buckingham Shum SJ, Carr CS (eds) (2003) Visualizing Argumentation. London: Springer
207. Kitchenham B, Linkman S (1998) Validation, verification, and testing: Diversity rules. IEEE Softw. 15(4):46-49
208. Kitchenham BA, Travassos GH, Von Mayhauser A, Niessink F, Schneidewind NF, Singer J, Takada S, Vehvilainen R, Yang, H (1999) Towards an ontology of software maintenance, J Softw Maintenance: Res Practice 11:365-389
209. Klein GA (1998) Source of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
210. Klein GA (1997a) Developing expertise in decision making. Thinking and Reasoning 3(4):337-352
211. Klein M (1997b) An exception handling approach to enhancing consistency, completeness and correctness in collaborative requirements capture. Concurrent Eng Res Appl 5(1):37-46
212. Klein M, Kazman R (1999) Attribute-Based Architectural Styles. CMU/SEI-99-TR-022. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA
213. Kleppe J, Warmer J, Bast W (2003) MDA explained, the model driven architecture: practice and promise, Addison-Wesley
214. Knodel J, Muthig D (2006) The role of rationale in the design of product line architectures - a case study from industry. In: Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrík I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Springer, pp 297-312
215. Knuth DE (1992) Literate programming. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information, CSLI Lecture Notes, no. 27
216. Ko AJ, Aung H, Myers BA (2005) Eliciting design requirements for maintenanceoriented IDEs: a detailed study of corrective and perfective maintenance tasks. In: Proceedings of the 27th international Conference on Software Engineering. St. Louis, MO, pp 126-135
217. Kolodner J (1993) Case-based reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California
218. Kontio J (1996) A case study in applying a systematic method for COTS selection In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering. Berlin, Germany, pp 201-209
219. Koschke R, Quante J (2005) On dynamic feature location. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM international Conference on Automated Software Engineering. Long Beach, CA, pp 86-95
220. Kraut RE, Streeter LA (1995) Coordination in software development, Communications of the ACM, 38(3), 69-81
221. Kraut RE (2003) Applying social psychological theory to the problems of group work. In J. M. Carroll (ed), HCI Models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann, pp 325-356
222. Kruchten P (1999) The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Addison-Wesley
223. Kunz W, Rittel H W J (1970) Issues as elements of information systems, Working Paper 131, Center for Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley
224. Kuusela J, Savolainen J (2000) Requirements engineering for product families. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, pp 61-69
225. Lai VS, Wong BK, Cheung W (2002) Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection, Eur J Oper Res 137:134-144
226. Lam W, Shankararaman V (1999) Requirements change: a dissection of management issues. In: Proceedings of the 25th Euromicro Conference, p. 2244
227. Lammers S (1986) Programmers at Work. Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington.
228. Lanza M (2001) The evolution matrix: recovering software evolution using software visualization techniques. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution. Vienna, Austria, pp 37-42
229. Larman C (2004) Agile and Iterative Development: A Manager's Guide, Addison-Wesley, New York
230. Larman C, Basili VR (2003) Iterative and incremental development: A brief history, IEEE Computer, IEEE, pp 47-56
231. Latane B, Bourgeois, MJ (2001) Dynamic social impact and the consolidation, clustering, correlation, and continuing diversity of culture. In: Hogg MA, Tindale RS (eds) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
232. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press
233. Lave J (1988) Cognition in practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press
234. Law J, Rothermel G (2003) Whole program Path-Based dynamic impact analysis. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, Oregon, pp 308-318
235. Lawson B (1979) Cognitive Strategies in Architectural Design. Ergonomics 22(1):59-68
236. Leavitt HJ (1951) Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 46:38-50.
237. Lee J (1990) SIBYL: A tool for managing group decision rationale. Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, ACM, New York, pp 79-92
238. Lee J (1991) Extending the Potts and Bruns model for recording design rationale. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, Austin, TX, pp 114-125
239. Lee J, Lai KY (1996) What's in design rationale? In: Moran T, Carroll J (eds) Design Rationale Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 21-51
240. Lee J (1990) SIBYL: A qualitative design management system, In: Winston PH, Shellard, S (eds) Artificial Intelligence at MIT: Expanding frontiers, pp. 104-133, Cambridge MA: MIT Press
241. Lehman MM (1996) Laws of software evolution revisited. In: Montangero C (ed.) Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 1149. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 108-124
242. Lehman MM (2005) The role and impact of assumptions in software development, maintenance, and evolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Software Evolvability. Budapest, Hungary, pp 3-14
243. Lehman MM, Frenández-Ramil J (2006) The role and impact of assumptions in software engineering and its products. In: Dutoit AH, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (eds) Rationale Management in Software Engineering. Springer, Germany, pp 311-328
244. Lewis C, Rieman J, Bells B (1996) Problem-centered design for expressiveness. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds) Design Rationale, Concepts, Techniques and Use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 147-184
245. Lewis JA, Henry SA, Kafura DG, Schulman RS (1991) An empirical study of the object-oriented paradigm and software reuse. In: Proceedings of OOPSLA, pp 184-196
246. Lientz BP, Swanson, EB (1988) Software maintenance management. Addison-Wesley
247. Lindquist C (2005) Fixing the requirements mess. CIO Magazine. 15 November, http://www.cio.com/archive/111505/require.html
248. Liskov, Guttag (1986) Abstraction and specification in program development, MIT Press, Cambridge
249. Lloyd P, Scott P (1994) Discovering the design problem. Des Stud 15(2):125-140
250. Lougher R, Rodden T (1993) Group support for the recording and sharing of maintenance rationale. Softw Eng J 8(6):295-306
251. Lozano-Tello A, Gomez-Perez A (2002) BAREMO: How to choose the appropriate software component using the analytic hierarchy process. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp 781-788
252. Mackay WE, Ratzer AV, Janecek P (2000) Video artifacts for design: Bridging the gap between abstraction and detail. In: ACM DIS 2000: Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Brooklyn, New York, New York: ACM, pp 72-82
253. MacLean A, Young RM, Bellotti V M E, Moran T (1996) Questions, Options and Criteria. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds) Design Rationale, Concepts, Techniques and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 53-106
254. MacLean A, Young RM, Bellotti V M E, Moran T (1991) Questions, Options and Criteria: Elements of design space analysis. J Human-Comput Interact 6:201-250
255. MacLean A, Young RM, Moran TP (1989) Design rationale: the argument behind the artifact. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: wings for the mind. ACM Press, pp 247-252
256. Madsen KH (1994) A guide to metaphorical design. Commun ACM 37(12):57-62
257. Maletic JI, Marcus A (2001) Supporting program comprehension using semantic and structural information. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. Toronto, Canada, pp 103-112
258. Mannion M, Keepence B, Kaindl H, Wheadon J (1999) Reusing single system requirements from application family requirements. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering. Limerick, Ireland, pp 453-462
259. Manola F (1999) Providing Systematic Properties (Ilities) and Quality of Service in Component-Based Systems. Technical report, Object Services and Consulting, Inc
260. Martin J (1991) Rapid Application Development. Macmillan, NY
261. Matena V, Hapner M (1999) Enterprise JavaBeans specification. v1.1. Sun Microsystems, java.sun. com/products/ejb/docs.html
262. nd edition, Prentice-Hall
263. Maynard-Ried II P, Shoham Y (2001) Belief fusion: aggregating pedigreed belief states. Journal of Logic, Language and Information. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10:183-209
264. McAndrews DR (2000) The Team Software Process (TSPSM): An Overview and Preliminary Results of Using Disciplined Practices. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TR-015
265. McCall R (1979a) On the structure and use of issue systems in design, Doctoral Dissertation 1978, University of California, Berkeley, University Microfilms
266. McCall R (1979b) Final Report for Project STIEC (Scientific and Technical Information in the European Community), Studiengruppe für Systemforschung, Heidelberg
267. McCall R (1986) Issue-Serve Systems: A Descriptive Theory of Design, In: Design Methods and Theories, vol 20, no 3, DMG, San Luis Obispo, pp 443-458
268. McCall R (1991) PHI: a conceptual foundation for design hypermedia. Des Stud 1:30-41
269. McCall R, Bennett P, Johnson E (1994) An overview of the Phidias II HyperCAD system", In: Proceedings of the 1994 Conference of The Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture. A. Harfmann, M. Fraser (eds), Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, pp. 63-74
270. McCall R, Johnson E (1997) Using argumentative agents to catalyze and support collaboration in design. Autom Constr 6(4):299-309
271. McCall R, Bennett P, D'Oronzio P, Ostwald J, Shipman F, Wallace N (1990) Phidias: A PHI-Based Design Environment Integrating CAD Graphics into Dynamic Hypertext. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Hypertext (ECHT 1990)
272. McCall R, Bennett P, D'Oronzio P, Oswald J, Shipman FM III, Wallace N (1992) PHIDIAS: Integrating CAD graphics into dynamic hypertext. In: Streitz N, Rizk A, André J (eds) Hypertext: Concepts, Systems and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 152-165
273. McCall R, Mistrik I, Schuler W (1981) An Integrated Information and Communication System for Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Seventh International CODATA Conference. Pergamon, London
274. McCall R, Mistrik I (2005) Capture of software requirements and rationale through collaborative software development. Requirements Engineering for Sociotechnical Systems, Mate JL and Silva A (eds) Information Science, Hershey, PA, pp 303-317
275. McKerlie D, MacLean A (1993) QOC in action (abstract): using design rationale to support design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Amsterdam, The Netherlands ACM, New York, NY, pp 519
276. Mehta A, Heineman GT (2002) Evolving legacy system features into fine-grained components. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering. Orlando, Florida, pp 417-427
277. Mellor SJ, Clark AN, Futagami T (2003) Guest editors' introduction: Modeldriven development. IEEE Softw 20(5):14-18
278. Mens K, Mens T, Wermelinger M (2002) Supporting software evolution with intentional software views. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution. Orlando, Florida, pp 138-142
279. Mens T, Demeyer S (2001) Future trends in software evolution metrics. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, Vienna, Austria, pp 83-86
280. Meyer T, Ghose AK, Chopra S (2001). Multi-agent context-based merging. In: Proceedings of Common Sense 2001: The Fifth Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, New York, USA, May 2001
281. Meyer B (1997) Object-Oriented Software Construction, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall
282. Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb JD (2002) Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 11(3):209-346
283. Mohamed A, Ruhe G, Eberlein A (2005) Decision support for customization of the COTS selection process. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Models and Processes for the Evaluation of COTS Components (MPEC'05). 27th International Conference on Software Engineering. St. Louis, Missouri, pp 1-4
284. Mongin P (1998) The paradox of the Bayesian experts and state-dependent utility theory. J Math Econ 29(3):331-361
285. Morisio M, Seaman C, Parra A, Basili VR, Condon S, Kraft S (2000) Investigating and improving a COTS-Based software development process. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering. Limerick, Ireland, pp. 32-41
286. Myer B (1988) Object Oriented Software Construction, Prentice Hall
287. Myers KL, Zumel NB, Garcia PE (1999) Automated capture of rationale for the detailed design process. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-99), AAAI, Menlo Park, CA, pp 876-883
288. Narayanan NH, Kolodner JL (1995) Case libraries in support of design education: the DesignMuse Experiences, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE Press
289. Nentwich C, Emmerich W, Finkelstein A, Ellmer E (2003) Flexible consistency checking. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 12(1):28-63
290. Newman MW, Landay JA (2000) Sitemaps, Storyboards, and Specifications: A Sketch of Web Site Design Practice. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems: DIS 2000. New York, NY. pp 263-274, August 17-19, 2000
291. Ng TH, Cheung SC, Chan WK, Yu YT (2006) Toward effective deployment of design patterns for software extension: a case study. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Software Quality. Shanghai, China, pp 51-56
292. Ngo-The A, Ruhe G. (2005) Decision Support in Requirements Engineering, In: Arum A, Wohlin C (eds) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements. Springer, pp 267-286
293. Nierstrasz O, Ducasse S, Grba T (2005) The story of moose: an agile reengineering environment. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Software Engineering Conference Held Jointly with 13th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal, pp 1-10
294. Nuseibeh B (1997) Ariane 5 Who Dunnit? IEEE Softw 14(3):15-16
295. Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook S (2000) Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering. Limerick, Ireland, pp 35-46
296. Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook S, Russo A (2000) Leveraging Inconsistency in Software Development. Computer 33(4):24-29
297. Oberto R (2002) FAIR/DART Option #2. Advanced Projects Design Team. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory
298. Object Management Group (2000) The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification Version 2.4
299. Oinas-Kukkonen H (1988) Evaluating the usefulness of design rationale in CASE. Eur J Inform Syst, 7(3):185-191
300. OMG (2005a) UML Object Constraint Language (OCL) Specification. v2.0. The Object Modeling Group
301. OMG (2005b) UML Superstructure. v2.1.1, The Object Modeling Group
302. Ossher H, Tarr P (1999) Multi-dimensional Separation of Concerns in Hyperspace, Tech. Report RC 21453(96717), IBM, TJ Watson Research Center, NY
303. Overhage S (2004) UnSCom: A standardized framework for the specification of software components. In: Weske M, Liggesmeyer P (eds) Object-Oriented and Internet-Based Technologies, 5th Annual International Conference on Object-Oriented and Internet-Based Technologies, Concepts, and Applications for a Networked World. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) 3263, Springer, pp 169-184
304. Parnas DL, Clements PC (1986) A Rational Design Process: How and why to fake it. IEEE Trans Softw Eng SE-12(2):251-257
305. Parsons S (2001) Qualitative Methods for Reasoning under Uncertainty, MIT Press
306. Parsons S, Hunter A (1998) A review of uncertainty handling formalisms. In: Hunter A, Parsons S (eds) Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 1455. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 8-37
307. Patterson DA (2005) 20th Century vs. 21st Century C&C: The SPUR Manifesto, The President's Letter, Communications of the ACM, Vol 48, No 3, pp 15-16
308. Paulk MC, Curtis B, Chrissis MB, Weber CV (1993) Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. CMU/SEI-93-TR-024
309. Payne C, Allgood CF, Chewar CM, Holbrook C, McCrickard DS (2003) Generalizing Interface Design Knowledge: Lessons Learned from Developing a Claims Library. IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI 2003), Las Vegas, pp 362-369
310. Pelled L, Eisenhardt K, Xin K (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin Sci Q 44:1-28
311. Peña-Mora F, Sriram D, Logcher R (1995) Design rationale for computersupported conflict mitigation. ASCE J Comput in Civil Eng 9(1):57-72
312. Peña-Mora F, Vadhavkar S (1997) Augmenting design patterns with design rationale. Artif Intell Eng Des, Anal Manuf 11(2):93-108
313. th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 735-742
314. Pigoski TM (1996) Practical Software Maintenance. Wiley
315. PMBOK (2003) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Project Management Institute Standards Committee, IEEE Std 1490-2003
316. Pollice G, Augustine L, Lowe C, Madhur J (2003) Software Development for Small Teams: a Rup-Centric Approach. Addison Wesley Longman
317. Potts C (1996) Supporting software design: integrating design methods and design rationale. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds) Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp 295-321
318. Potts C, Bruns (1988) Recording the reasons for design decisions, In: Proceedings of the 10th International conference on software engineering, Singapore, pp 418-427
319. Potts C (1989) A generic model for representing design methods, Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Software Eng., Pittsburgh, IEEE Comp. Soc. Press
320. Potts C, Takahashi K, Anton A (1994) Inquiry-based requirements analysis, IEEE Softw 11(2):21-32
321. Prechelt L, Unger B, Tichy WF, Brössler P, Votta LG (2001) A controlled experiment in maintenance comparing design patterns to simpler solutions. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 27(12):1134-1144
322. Price B, Baecker R, Small I (1998) An introduction to software visualization. In: Stasko J, Dominigue J, Brown M, Price B (eds) Software Visualization: Programming as a Multimedia Experience. The MIT Press, pp 3-27
323. Queille J, Voidrot J, Wilde N, Munro M (1994) The impact analysis task in software maintenance: a model and a case study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, Victoria, BC, pp 234-242
324. Rajlich V (2006) Changing the software paradigm. Commun ACM 49(8):67-70
325. Ramesh B, Dhar V (1992) Supporting systems development by capturing deliberations during requirements engineering, IEEE Trans Softw Eng 18(6), 498-510
326. Ramesh B, Dhar V (1994) Representing and maintaining process knowledge for large-scale systems development, EEE Expert 9(2):54-60
327. Ramires J, Antunes P, Respício A (2005) Software requirements negotiation using the software quality function deployment. In: Fuks H, Lukosch S, Salgado A (eds) Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 3706, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, pp 308-324
328. Ramler R, Biffl S, Grunbacher P (2006) Value-based management of software testing. In: Biffl S, Aurum A, Boehm B, Erdogmus H, Grunbacher P (eds) Value-Based Software Engineering, Springer
329. Randal B, Buxton JN (1970) Software engineering techniques: A report on a conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, NATO
330. Rasmussen J (1974) The human data processor as a system component: Bits and pieces of a model. Riso-M-1722. Roskilde, Denmark: Danish Atomic Energy Commission
331. Raymond E (2001) The Cathedral and the Bazaar. Revised Edition. O'Reilly
332. Redwine S, Riddle W (1985). Software technology maturation, In: Proc. of the 8th ICSE, pp 189-200
333. Reeves B, Shipman FM III (1992) Supporting communication between designers with artifact-centered evolving information spaces In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, November 1-4, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pp 394-401
334. Reiss SP (2002) Constraining software evolution. In: Proceedings of the International conference on Software maintenance, Montreal, Quebec Canada, pp 162-171
335. Reiss SP, Kennedy CM, Wooldridge T, Krishnamurthi S (2003) CLIME: an environment for constrained evolution demonstration description. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering. Portland, Oregon, pp 818-819
336. Reitman WR (1965) Cognition and Thought.: An Information Processing Approach. New York: Wiley
337. Réquilé-Romanczuk A, Cechich A, Dourgnon-Hanoune A, Mielnik J (2005) Towards a knowledge-based framework for COTS component identification. In: Proceedings of the Second international Workshop on Models and Processes for the Evaluation of Off-the-Shelf Components. St. Louis, Missouri, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 1-4
338. Riesbeck C, Schank R (1989) Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ
339. Rittel H (1980) APIS: A concept for an argumentative planning information system. Working paper 324, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley
340. Rittel H, Weber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4:155-169
341. Rittel H (1972a) On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the first and second generations. Bedriftsokonomen, Norway, 8:390-396
342. Rittel H. (1972b) Son of Rittelthink, DMG Newsletter 3-10 Berkeley: University of California.
343. Robillard MP (2005) Automatic generation of suggestions for program investigation. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Software Engineering Conference Held Jointly with 13th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal, pp 11-20
344. Roman G (1985) A taxonomy of current issues in requirements engineering. Computer, 18(4):14-22
345. Rosson MB, Alpert SA (1990) The cognitive consequences of object-oriented design. Human-Computer Interaction, 5:345-379
346. Rosson MB, Carroll JM (1996) The reuse of uses in Smalltalk programming. ACM Trans Computer-Human Inter, 3(3):219-253
347. Rothermel G, Elbaum S (2003) Putting Your Best Tests Forward. IEEE Softw 20(5):74-77
348. Royce WW (1970) Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques. In: Proceedings of IEEE WESTCON, Los Angeles, California, pp 1-9
349. Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York
350. Saiedian H, Dale R (2000) Requirements engineering: making the connection between the software developer and customer. Inform Softw Technol 42:419-428
351. Schmid K (2002) A comprehensive product line scoping approach and its validation. In: Proceedings of ICSE. Orlando, Florida, pp 593-603
352. Schmidt DC (2006) Guest editor's introduction. Model-Driven Engineering. Computer 39(2):25-31
353. Schmidt DC, Buschmann F (2003) Patterns, frameworks, and middleware: their synergistic relationships. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering. Portland, Oregon, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 694-704
354. Schneider K (2006) Rationale as a by-product, In: Rationale Management in Software Engineering, Dutoit A, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (eds) Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 91-109
355. Schön D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York
356. Schultz DJ (1979) A case study in system integration using the Build approach. In: Proceedings of the 1979 Annual Conference. pp 143-151
357. Scriven M (1967) The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler R, Gagne R, Scriven M (eds) Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, Rand McNally, pp 39-83
358. SEI (1997) Integrated Product Development Capability Maturity Model, Draft Version 0.98. Pittsburgh, PA: Enterprise Process Improvement Collaboration and Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
359. Shafer G (1976) A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
360. Sharp H, Finkelstein A, Galal G (1999) Stakeholder Identification in the Requirements Engineering Process. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp 387
361. Shipman FM III, McCall R (1994) Supporting knowledge-base evolution with incremental formalization. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, pp 285-291
362. Shipman F, McCall R (1997) Integrating different perspectives on design rationale: Supporting the emergence of design rationale from design communication, Artif Intell Eng Des, Anal, Manuf 11(2):141-154
363. Shipman FM III, Marshall CC (1999a) Formality considered harmful: Experiences, emerging themes, and directions on the use of formal representations in interactive systems. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8(3):333-352
364. Shipman FM III, Marshall CC (1999b) Spatial hypertext: An alternative to navigational and semantic links. ACM Comput Surv 31(4):1-5
365. Siff M, Reps T (1999) Identifying modules via concept analysis. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 25(6):749-768
366. Sim S, Duffy A (1994) A new perspective to design intent and design rationale. In: Workshop Notes for Representing and Using Design Rationale. Artificial Intelligence in Design. pp 4-12
367. Simon HA (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley
368. Singer J (1998) Practices of software maintenance. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'98). Bethesda, Maryland, USA, pp 139-145
369. Smith RP, Tjandra P (1998) Experimental observation of iteration in engineering design. Res Eng Des 10(2):107-117
370. Sneed H (1995) Planning the reengineering of legacy systems. IEEE Softw. 12(1):24-34
371. Sneed HM (2001) Impact analysis of maintenance tasks for a distributed objectoriented system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, Florence, Italy, pp 180-189
372. Software Engineering Coordinating Committee (2004) Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK), IEEE Computer Society
373. Sommerville I (2007) Software Engineering. 8th edn, Addison Wesley
374. Spanoudakis G, Zisman A (2001) Inconsistency management in software engineering: survey and open research issues. In: Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 1, World Scientific, pp 329-380
375. Srivastava A, Thiagarajan J (2002) Effectively prioritizing tests in development environment. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. Roma, Italy, pp 97-106
376. Stahl T, Volter M (2006) Model-driven software development, Wiley, NY
377. Stark GE, Oman P, Skillicorn A, Ameele A (1999) An examination of the effects of requirements changes on software maintenance releases. J Softw Maintenance 11(5):293-309
378. Stobie K (2005) Too darned big to test. Queue 3(1):30-37
379. Stone M (1961) The linear opinion pool. Ann Math Stat 32:1339-1342
380. Subramaniam GV (2000) Object model resurrection - an object oriented maintenance activity. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering. Limerick, Ireland, pp 324-333
381. Subramanian N, Chung L (2001) Software architecture adaptability: an NFR approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution. Vienna, Austria, pp 52-61
382. Subramanian N, Chung L (2002) Tool support for engineering adaptability into software architecture. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution. Orlando, Florida, pp 86-96
383. Sutcliffe AG, Carroll JM (1999) Designing claims for reuse in interactive systems design. Int J Human-Comput Stud 50(3):213-241
384. th Annual IEEE Int. Conf. and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS'05), pp 135-144
385. Tang A, Jin Y, Han J (2005a) A rationale-based architecture model for design traceability and reasoning. J Sys Softw 80:918-934
386. Tang A, Jin Y, Han J, Nicholson A (2005b) Predicting change impact in architecture design with Bayesian Belief Networks. In: proceedings of the 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, pp 67-76
387. Tang A, Babar M, Gorton I, Han J (2006) A survey of architecture design rationale. J Sys Softw 79:1792-1804
388. Tarr P, Clarke LA (1998) Consistency management for complex applications. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, pp 230-239
389. Taylor RN, Van Der Hoek A (2007) Software Design and Architecture: The once and future focus of software engineering. In: 2007 Future of Software Engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering. Minneapolis, MN, pp 226-243
390. Thayer RH, Dorfman M (1990) Introduction, issues, and terminology. In: Thayer RH, Dorfman M (eds) System and Software Requirements Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1st edn, pp 1-3
391. Thelin T, Runeson P, Wohlin C (2003) An experimental comparison of usagebased and checklist-based reading. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 29(8):687-702.
392. Tip F (1995) A survey of program slicing techniques. J Prog Lang 3(3):121-189
393. Tonella P, Antoniol G (1999) Object oriented design pattern inference. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp 230-238
394. Toulmin S (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
395. Turner M, Budgen D, Brereton P (2003) Turning software into a service. IEEE Comput 36(10):38-44
396. Tyree J, Akerman A (2005) Architecture decisions: Demystifying architecture. IEEE Softw 22(2):19-27
397. th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, pp 249-263
398. Van Lamsweerde A (2003) From system goals to software architecture. In: Bernardo M, Inverardi P (eds) Formal Methods for Software Architectures, Springer-Verlag
399. th International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp 4-8
400. Van Lamsweerde A, Letier E (2000) Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng Special Issue on Exception Handling 26(10):978-1005
401. Vetschera R (2006) Preference-based decision support in software engineering. In: Biffl S, Aurum A, Boehm B, Erdogmus H, Grunbacher P (eds) Value-Based Software Engineering, Springer, pp 67-89
402. Vincenti W (1990) What engineers know and how they know it. John Hopkins University Press
403. Voas JM, Miller KW (1995) Software testability: the new verification. IEEE Softw 12(3):17-28
404. Von Mayrhauser A, Vans AM (1994) Comprehension processes during large scale maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering. Sorrento, Italy, pp 39-48
405. Wahid S, Smith J. L, Berry B, Chewar CM, McCrickard, DS (2004) Visualization of Design Knowledge Component Relationships to Facilitate Reuse. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI'04), Las Vegas NV, November, pp 414-419.
406. Walker RJ, Holmes R, Hedgeland I, Kapur P, Smith A (2006) A lightweight approach to technical risk estimation via probabilistic impact analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, Shanghai, China, pp 98-104
407. Wallin P, Fröberg A, Axelsson A (2007) Making decisions in integration of automotive software and electronics: A method based on ATAM and AHP, In: Proceedings SEAS'07 (Fourth International Workshop on Software Engineering for Automotive Systems), IEEE Computer Society, pp 5
408. Wang L, Tan KC (2005) Software testing for safety-critical applications. IEEE Instrum Measure Mag 8(2):38-47
409. Wang N, Schmidt D, O'Ryan C (2001) Overview of the CORBA component model. In: Councill B, Heineman G (eds) Component-Based Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, pp 557-571
410. Wang X, Xiong G (2001) Design rationale as part of corporate technical memory, In: International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tucson, AZ: 3:1904-1908
411. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA
412. Weiser M (1981) Program slicing. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Software Engineering, San Diego, California, pp 439-449
413. Weizenbaum, J (1966) ELIZA-A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Comm ACM 9(1):36-35
414. Wellman MP (1990) Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic networks. Artif Intell 44:257-303
415. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press
416. Whitehead J (2007) Collaboration in Software Engineering: A Roadmap. In: 2007 Future of Software Engineering, International Conference on Software Engineering. Minneapolis, MN, pp. 214-225
417. Whittaker S, Schwarz H (1995) Back to the Future: Pen and Paper Technology Supports Complex Group Coordination, In Proceedings of ACM CHI'95Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 495-502
418. Workshop on Multi-Dimensional Separation of Concerns, International Conference on Software Engineering 2000, http://www.research.ibm.com/hyperspace/ workshops/icse2000
419. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8:338-353
420. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3-28
421. Zhu L, Gorton I (2007) UML profiles for design decisions and non-functional requirements. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Sharing and Reusing of Architectural Knowledge, at the International Conference of Software Engineering (ICSE), Minneapolis, Minnesota.
422. Zimmermann T, Weisgerber P, Diehl S, Zeller A (2004) Mining version histories to guide software changes. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 563-572
423. Zimring CM, Do ED, Domeshek ED, Kolodner JL (1995) Supporting case-study use in design education: A computational case-based design aid for architecture. In: Mohsen JP (ed.) Computing in Civil Engineering: Proceedings of the Second Congress. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp 1635-1642
424. Ziv H, Richardson DJ, Klosch R (1996) The uncertainty principle in software engineering. Technical Report UCI-TR-96-33, University of California, Irvine