Graphical argumentation and design cognition

Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 267-300

  Buckingham Shum, Simon J ^a   MacLean, Allan ^b   Bellotti, Victoria M E ^c   Hammond, Nick V ^d  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b XEROX CORPORATION   (United States)

^c APPLE INC   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

GRAPHICAL ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0031335604     PISSN: 07370024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci1203_2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arango, G., Bruneau, L., Cloarec, J.-F., & Feroldi, A. (1991). A tool shell for tracking design decisions. IEEE Software, March, 75-83.
2. Selvin, A. (1997). An issue-based hypertext approach to collaborative process redesign (Technical Memorandum TM 97-0007). White Plains, NY: NYNEX Science & Technology.
3. Shum, S. (1991). Cognitive dimensions of design rationale. In D. Diaper & N. V. Hammond (Eds.), People and computers VI: Proceedings of HCI'91 (pp. 331-344). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Shum, S., MacLean, A., Forder, J., & Hammond, N. V. (1993). Summarizing the evolution of design concepts within a design rationale framework. Adjunct Proceedings of the InterCHI'93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 43-44. New York: ACM. Available ftp://kmi.open.ac.uk/pub/simonb/interchi93.ps
5. Sjöberg, C., & Timpka, T. (1995). Inside multidisciplinary design in medical informatics: Experiences from the use of an argumentative design method. Proceedings of the MEDINFO'95 Tri-annual World Conference in Medical Informatics. Amsterdam: North Holland. Available http://www.mrc-apu.cam.ac.uk/amodeus/ abstracts/cp/cp76.html
6. Smolensky, P., Bell, B., Fox, B., King, R., & Lewis, C. (1987). Constraint-based hypertext for argumentation. Proceedings of the Hypertext'87 Conference, 215-245. New York: ACM.
7. Streitz, N., Hanneman, J., & Thüring, M. (1989). From ideas and arguments to hyperdocuments: Travelling through activity spaces. Proceedings of the Hypertext'89 Conference, 343-364. New York: ACM.
8. Stutt, A., & Motta, E. (1995). Recording the design decisions of knowledge engineers to facilitate re-use of design models. Proceedings 9th Banff Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science.
9. Tang, J. C. (1989). Listing, drawing and gesturing in design: A study of the use of shared workspaces by design teams (Technical Report SSL 89-3). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
10. Tang, J. C. (1991). Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 2, 143-160.
11. Also in S. Greenberg (Ed.) Computer supported cooperative work and groupware (pp. 11-28). London: Academic Press, 1991.
12. Tang, J. C., & Minneman, S. L. (1990). VideoDraw: A video interface for collaborative drawing. Proceedings of the CHI'90 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 313-320. New York: ACM.
13. Tang, J. C. & Minneman, S. L. (1991). VideoWhiteboard: Video shadows to support remote collaboration. Proceedings of the CHI'91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 315-322. New York: ACM.
14. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. VanLehn, K. (1985). Theory reform caused by an argumentation tool (Technical Report ISL-11). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
16. Vanwelkenhuysen, J. (1995). Embedding non-functional requirements analyses in conceptual knowledge systems designs. Proceedings of the 9th Banff Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, 1-15. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary, Department of Computer Science.