Requirements engineering for product families

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 61-69

  Kuusela, Juha ^a   Savolainen, Juha ^a  

^a NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPECIFICATIONS;

PRODUCT FAMILIES; PRODUCT LINE; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES;

REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

EID: 0033697175     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: None    
DOI: 10.1145/337180.337189     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Morris D., Evans G., Green P., Theaker C., Object Oriented Computer Systems Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996, pp. 96-97.
2. Davis A., Software Requirements - Objects, Functions, and States, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1993, pp. 178- 179.
3. Barbacci M., Klein M., Weinstock C., Principles for Evaluation the Quality Attributes of a Software Architecture, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-96-TR-036, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, March 1997.
4. Barbacci M., Carriere J., Feiler P., Kazman R., Klein M:, Lipson H., Longstaff T., Weinstock C., Steps in an Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method: Quality Attribute Models and Analysis, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-97-TR-029, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, May 1998.
5. Kazman R., et.al., The Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-97-TR-029, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, May 1998.
6. Sommerville I., Software Engineering, Addison-Wesley, 1995, pp. 130-134
7. Kang K., Cohen S., Hess J., Novak W., Peterson S., Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-90-TR-021, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, November 1990.
8. Jackson M., Software Requirements & Specification - a lexicon of practise, principles and prejedices, ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, 1995, pp. 98-100.
9. IEEE Recommended Best Practice for Software Requirements Specifications, IEEE Standard 830-1998, IEEE, 1998
10. Ran A., Kuusela J., "Design Decision Trees," in Proceedings of the Eight International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, IEEE Computer Society Press, March 1996, pp. 172-175.
11. Karhinen A., Kuusela J., "Structuring Design Decisions for Evolution," in Development and Evolution of Software Architectures for Product Families, Springer-Verlag, February 1998, pp. 223-234.
12. Cohen S., Stanley J., Peterson W., Krut R., Application of Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis to the Army Movement Control Domain, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-91 -TR-028, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, June1992.
13. Chung L., Gross D., Yu E., "Architectural Design to Meet Stakeholder Requirements," in Software Architecture, P. Donohoe (Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, pp. 545-564.
14. Chung L., Nixon B., Yu E., "Using Non-Functional Requirements to Systematically Select Among Alternatives in Architectural Design," in Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems, D. Garlan (Ed.), Carnegie Mellon University, April 1995, pp. 31-43.
15. Alonso A., Leon G., Duenas J., de la Puente J., "Framework for Documenting Design Decisions in Product Families Development," in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Engineering Complex Computer Systems, IEEE Computer Society Press, September 1997, pp. 206-211.
16. Mazur G., "QFD for Small Business - A Shortcut through the Maze of Matrices," in Proceedings of the Sixth Symphosium on Quality Function Deployment, QFD Institute, June 1994.
17. Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) for Non-Federal Applications, Advisory Circular, 150/5220-16B, 1995, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).