Making decisions in integration of automotive software and electronics: A method based on ATAM and AHP

Proceedings - ICSE 2007 Workshops: Fourth International Workshop on Software Engineering for Automotive Systems, SEAS'07

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Wallin, Peter ^a   Fröberg, Joakim ^b   Axelsson, Jakob ^c  

^a MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b VOLVO AERO CORPORATION   (Sweden)

^c VOLVO CAR CORPORATION   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; COMPUTER CONTROL; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DECISION MAKING; INTEGRATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ARCHITECTURE TRADEOFF ANALYSIS METHOD (ATAM); AUTOMATIC GEARBOX; IN-VEHICLE AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS;

AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING;

EID: 36248952589     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SEAS.2007.7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. SAE J1939 Standard - The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Truck and Bus Control and Communications Subcommittee, SAE J1939 Standards Collection, 2004 Available at: http://www.sae.org/products/j1939.htm.
2. M. Barbacci, P. Clements, A. Lattanze, L. Northrop, and W. Wood. Using the architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM) to evaluate the software architecture for a product line of avionics systems: A case study. Technical note, CMU/SEI-2003-TN-012, 2003.
3. J. K. Bergey and M. J. Fisher. Use of the architecture trade-off analysis method (ATAM) in the acquisition of software-intensive systems. Tecnical note, CMU/SEI-2001-TN-009, 2001.
4. J. Fröberg and M. Åkerholm. Integration of electronic components in heavy vehicles: A study of integration in three cases. In Proceedings from Systems Engineering/Test and Evaluation Conference, Melbourne, 25-27 September 2006, Melbourne, September 2006.
5. R. Kazman, M. Klein, and P. Clements. ATAM: Method for architecutre evaluation. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, CMU/SEI-2000-TR-004.
6. A. Möller, M. Åkerholm, J. Fröberg, and M. Nolin. Industrial grading of quality requirements for automotive software component technologies. In Embedded Real-Time Systems Implementation Workshop in conjunction with the 26th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2005 Miami, USA, December 2005.
7. A. Möller, J. Fröberg, and M. Nolin. Industrial requirements on component technologies for embedded systems. In International Symposium on Component-based Software Engineering (CBSE7), Edinburgh, Scotland, May 2004. Springer Verlag.
8. J. W. Ra. Chainwise paired comparison. Decision Sciences, 30(2):581-599, 1999.
9. G. C. Roper-Lowe and J. A. Sharp. The analytic hierarchy process and its application to an information technology decision. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(1):49-59, jan 1990.
10. T. Saaty. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
11. L. Zhu, A. Aurum, I. Gorton, and R. Jeffery. Tradeoff and sensitivity analysis in software architecture evaluation using analytic hierarchy process. Software Quality Control, 13(4):357-375, 2005.