Dealing with change: An approach using non-functional requirements

Requirements Engineering

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 238-260

  Chung, Lawrence ^a   Nixon, Brian A ^b   Yu, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042056235     PISSN: 09473602     EISSN: 1432010X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01587102     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Jarke M, Pohl K. Requirements engineering in the year 2001: On (virtually) managing a changing reality. Workshop on system requirements: analysis, management, and exploitation, Schloß Dagstuhl, Saarland, Germany, 4-7 October 1994
2. Curtis B, Krasner H, Iscoe N. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun ACM 1988; 31(11): 1268-1287
3. 2b. Green S. Goal-driven approaches to requirements engineering. Tech Rep 94/9, Department of Computing, University of the West of England, 1994
4. Chung KL. Representing and using non-functional requirements: a process-oriented approach. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, June 1993. Also Technical Report DKBS-TR93-1
5. Mylopoulos J, Chung L, Nixon B. Representing and using non-functional requirements: a process-oriented approach. IEEE Trans Software Eng (special issue on knowledge representation and reasoning in software development) 1992; 18(6): 483-497
6. Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E, Mylopoulos J. Non-functional requirements in software engineering. Forthcoming monograph, 1997
7. The Barclays code of business banking. Barclays Bank, London, 1992
8. The Barclays code of business banking. Barclays Bank, London, 1993
9. Loucopoulos P, Karakostas V. System requirements engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995
10. Annual review and summary financial statement. Barclays Bank, London, 1993
11. Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E. Using quality requirements to drive software development. Workshop on research issues in the intersection between software engineering and artificial intelligence, Sorrento, Italy, May 1994
12. Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E. Using quality requirements to systematically develop quality software. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on software quality, McLean, VA, 3-5 October 1994
13. Nixon BA. Performance requirements for information systems. PhD thesis draft, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, March 1997
14. Simon HA. The sciences of the artificial (2nd edn). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981
15. Nilsson N. Problem-solving methods in artificial intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York
16. Chung L. Representation and utilization of non-functional requirements for information system design. In: Anderson R, Bubenko Jr JA, Sølvberg A (eds). Advanced information systems engineering. Proceedings of the third international conference, CAiSE '91. Trondheim, Norway, 13-15 May 1991. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991, pp 5-30
17. Chung L. Dealing with security requirements during the development of information systems. In: Rolland C, Bodat F, Cauvet C (eds). Advanced information systems engineering. Proceedings of the fifth international conference, CAiSE '93, Paris, 8-11 June 1993. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993, pp 234-251
18. Nixon B. Implementation of information systems design specifications: a performance perspective. In Kanellakis P, Schmidt JW (eds). Database programming languages: bulk types and persistent data - The third international workshop, August 1991, Nafplion, Greece. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992, pp 149-168
19. Nixon BA. Dealing with performance requirements during the development of information systems. Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, San Diego, CA, 4-6 January 1993. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1992, pp 42-49
20. Nixon BA. Representing and using performance requirements during the development of information systems. In: Jarke M, Bubenko J, Jeffery K (eds). Advances in database technology - EDBT '94, proceedings of the fourth international conference on extending database technology, Cambridge, UK. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994, pp 187-200
21. European Communities. Information technology security education criteria, provisional harmonised criteria, Version 1.2, June 1991, Luxembourg
22. Smith CU. Performance engineering of software systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990
23. McCabe TJ, Schulmeyer GG. The Pareto principle applied to software quality assurance. In: Schulmeyer GG, McManus JI (eds). Handbook of software quality assurance. Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York, 1987, pp 178-210
24. Juran JM, Gryna Jr FM, Bingham Jr RS (eds). Quality control handbook (3rd Edn). McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979
25. Report and accounts. Barclays Bank, London, 1993
26. Chung L, Nixon BA. Dealing with non-functional requirements: three experimental studies of a process-oriented approach. Proceedings of the 17th ICSE, Seattle, WA, April 1995, pp 25-37
27. Nixon BA, Chung KL, Lauzon D, Borgida A, Mylopoulos J, Stanley M. Design of a compiler for a semantic data model. In: Schmidt JW, Thanos C (eds). Founda-tions of knowledge base management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989, pp 293-343
28. Hyslop WE Performance prediction of relational database management systems. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1991
29. Mylopoulos J, Borgida A, Jarke M, Koubarakis M. Telos: representing knowledge about information systems. ACM Trans Inform Syst 1990; 8: 325-362
30. Kramer BM. RepBrowser tool and documentation, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1995
31. Stanley MT. Telos sh tool and documentation. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1995
32. Jarke M (ed). ConceptBase V3.1 User Manual. University of Passau, 1992
33. Yu E. Modelling strategic relationships for process reengineering. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1995. Also Technical Report DKBS-TR-94-6
34. Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E. Using non-functional requirements to systematically select among alternatives in architectural design. Proceedings of the first international workshop on architectures for software systems, Seattle, Washington, April 1995, pp 31-43
35. Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E. Using non-functional requirements to systematically support change. Proceedings of the second international symposium on requirements engineering, York, 27-29 March 1995, pp 132-139
36. Lehman MM, Belady LA. Program evolution: processes of software change. Academic Press, London, 1985
37. Harker SDP, Eason KD, Dobson JE. The change and evolution of requirements as a challenge to the practice of software engineering. Proceedings of the IEEE International symposium on requirements engineering, San Diego, CA, 4-6 January 1993. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1992, pp 266-272
38. Madhavji N. Panel on 'impact of environmental evolution on requirements change'. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Annapolis, MD, 6-10 January 1997, pp 98-99
39. Lee J. Extending the Potts and Bruns model for recording design rationale. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, Austin, TX, May 1991, pp 114-125
40. Potts C, Bruns G. Recording the reasons for design decisions. Proceedings of the 10th ICSE, 1988, pp 418-427
41. Pohl K. A process centered requirements engineering environment. PhD dissertation, Informatik V, RWTH-Aachen, Germany, February 1995
42. Pohl K. Process-centered requirements engineering. Wiley/Research Studies Press, New York, 1996
43. Sutcliffe A. A conceptual framework for requirements engineering. Requirements Eng 1996; 1(3): 170-189
44. Gotel OCZ, Finkelstein ACW. An analysis of the requirements traceability problem. Proceedings of the international conference on requirements engineering, Colorado Springs, 1994
45. Basili VR, Rombach HD. The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Trans Software Eng 1988; 14(6): 758-773
46. Coleman D, Ash D, Lowther B, Oman P. Using metrics to evaluate software system maintainability. IEEE Comput 1994; 27(8)
47. Coombes AC, McDermid JA. Using qualitative physics in requirements specification of safety critical systems: a potential AI user's perspective. Workshop on Research Issues in the Intersection Between Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, Sorrento, Italy, May 1994
48. Artif Intell J (Special issue on qualitative reasoning) 1984; 24(1-3)
49. Fickas S. Desert island column. Automated Software Eng 1994; 1(1): 141-146
50. Jarke M, Mylopoulos J, Schmidt JW, Vassiliou Y. DAIDA: an environment for evolving information systems. ACM Trans Inform Syst 1992; 10(1): 1-50
51. 49b. Chung KL, Katalagarianos P, Marakakis M, Mertikas M, Mylopoulos J, Vassiliou Y. From information system requirements to designs: a mapping framework. Inform Syst 1991; 16(4): 429-461
52. Jarke M, Rose T. Managing knowledge about information system evolution. Proceedings of SIGMOD '88, Chicago, May 1988, pp 303-311
53. Rolland C. Modeling the evolution of artifacts. Proceedings of the international conference on requirements engineering, Colorado Springs, CO, April 1994
54. Yu E. Modelling Organizations for information systems requirements engineering. Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, San Diego, CA, 4-6 January 1993. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1992, pp 34-41
55. Yu ESK, Mylopoulos J. Understanding 'Why' in software process modelling, analysis, and design. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on software engineering, Sorrento, Italy, May 1994, pp 159-168
56. Yu E. Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the third IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, Annapolis, MD, 6-10 January 1997, pp 226-235
57. Greenspan SJ, Mylopoulos J, Borgida A. Capturing more world knowledge in the requirements specification. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering, 1982, pp 225-234
58. Greenspan S, Mylopoulos J, Borgida A. On formal requirements modeling languages: RML revisited. Proceedings of the 16th ICSE, Sorrento, Italy, May 1994, pp 135-147
59. Mylopoulos J, Borgida A, Yu E. Representing software engineering knowledge. Automated Software Engineering 1997; 4(3) to appear
60. Yu E, Mylopoulos J. From E-R to 'A-R': modelling strategic actor relationships for business process reengineering. Int J Intell Coop Inform Syst 1995; 4(2,3): 1995, 125-144
61. Yu E, Mylopoulos J, Lesperance Y. AI models for business process reengineering. IEEE Expert 1996; 16-23