Augmenting design patterns with design rationale

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 93-108

  Peña Mora, Feniosky ^a   Vadhavkar, Sanjeev ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

Component Based Software; Design Patterns; Design Rationale; Product Process Modeling; Software Reusability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; DECISION MAKING; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; PRODUCT DESIGN;

SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0031125329     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s089006040000189x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bradley, S., & Agogino, A. (1991). Design capture and information management for concurrent design Int J Systems Automation: Res. and Appl. 1(2), pp 117-141.
2. Casotto, A., Newton, A., & Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (1990). Design Management based on Design Traces. 27th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, 136-141.
3. Conklin, J., & Begeman, M. (1988). gIBIS: A Hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Inf. Syst. 6(4), 303-331.
4. Favela, J., Wong, A., & Chakravarthy, A. (1993). Supporting collaborative engineering design. Eng. Computers 9(4), 125-132.
5. Fischer, G., McCall, R., & Morch, A. (1989). Design environments for constructive and argumentative design. Proc. CHI '89, pp. 269-276. Austin, Texas.
6. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1994). Design patterns. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
7. Ganeshan, R., Finger, S., & Garrett, J. (1991). Representing and reasoning with design intent. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '91 (Gero, J., Ed.). Kluwer, London, England.
8. Garcia, A., & Howard, H. (1992). Acquiring design knowledge through design decision justification. AI EDAM 6(1), 59-71.
9. Gruber, T., Tenenbaum, J., & Webber, J. (1992). Toward a knowledge medium for collaborative product development. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '92, (Gero, J., Ed.), pp. 413-432. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, England.
10. Isakowitz, T., & Kauffman, R. (1996). Supporting search for reusable software objects. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22(6), 407-424.
11. Kim, T. (1994). OODesigner FAQ. Pusan University of Foreign Studies, Pusan, Korea.
12. Kim, W., & Lochovsky, F. (1989). Object-oriented concepts, databases and applications. ACM and Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
13. Klein, M. (1992). DRCS: An integrated system for capture of designs and their rationale. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '92 (Gero, J., Ed.) pp. 393-412. Kluwer, London, England.
14. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case based reasoning. Morgan-Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.
15. Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. (1970). Issues as Elements of Information Systems. Institute of Urban and Regional Development Working Paper 131, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
16. Lee, J. (1990). SIBYL: A qualitative decision management system. In Artificial Intelligence at MIT Expanding Frontiers, (Winston, P., & Shellard, S.,Eds.),Chap. 5,pp. 104-133. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Lu, S., Klein, M., & Baskin, A. (1990). Towards a theory of conflict resolution in cooperative design. Proc. Twenty-Third Ann. Int. Conf. On System Sciences, pp. 41-50. IEEE Press, New York.
18. Lubars, M. (1991). The ROSE-2 strategies for supporting high-level software design reuse. In Automating Software Design, (Hahn, F., Ed.). pp. 184-190. AAAI Press anil The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Luqi, & Royce, W. (1992). Status Report: Computer-Aided Prototyping. IEEE Software 19(5), 77-81.
20. Nierstrasz, O. (1993). Composing active objects. In Research Directions in Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming, (Agha, G., Wegner, P., & Yonezawa, A., Eds.), pp. 151-171. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Peña-Mora, F. (1994). Design rationale for computer supported conflict mitigation during the design-construction process of large-scale civil engineering systems. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
22. Peña-Mora, F., Sriram, D., & Logcher, R. (1995a). Conflict mitigation system for collaborative engineering. AI EDAM 9(2), 101-124.
23. Pefia-Mora, F., Sriram, D., & Logcher, R. (1995b). Designrationale for computer supported conflict mitigation. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 9(1), 57-72.
24. Peña-Mora, F., & Vadhavkar, S. (1996). Design rationale and design patterns in reusable software design. In Artificial Intelligence in Design '96, (Gero, J., Ed.), (pp. 251-268). Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, England.
25. Potts, C., & Bruns, G. (1988). Recording the reasons for design decisions. Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Software Eng., 418-427.
26. Rossignac, J., Borrel, P., & Nackman, L. (1988). Interactive design with sequences of parameterized transformations. In Intelligent CAD Systems 2: Implementational Issues. (Akman, V., ten Hagen, P J.W., & Veerkamp, V.), pp. 93-125. Springer-Verlag, New York.
27. Rurnbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-oriented modeling and design. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
28. Schmidt, D. (1995). Experience using design patterns to develop reusable object-oriented communication software. Communications of the ACM 38; 65-74.
29. Shaw, M. (1990). Towards higher level of abstractions for software systems. Data and Knowledge Eng. 5, 119-128.
30. Shum, S.B. (1996). Designing argumentation as design rationale. In The Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, (Kent, A., & Williams, J.G., Eds.), pp. 2-8. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
31. Smith, D. (1990). KIDS: A semi-automatic program development system. IEEE Transactions on Software Eng. 16, 1024-1043.
32. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
33. Weide, B., Edwards, S., Heym, W., Long, T., & Ogden, W. (1996). Characterizing observability and controllability of software components. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Software Reuse, 62-71.