Personalized models of search satisfaction

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2009-2018

  Hassan, Ahmed ^a   White, Ryen W ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Personalized search satisfaction; Satisfaction models; User cohorts

Indexed keywords

PERSONALIZED MODEL; PERSONALIZED SEARCH; QUERY REFINEMENT; SATISFACTION MODEL; SEARCH SYSTEM; STUDY AND APPLICATIONS; USER COHORTS; USER SATISFACTION;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

SEARCH ENGINES;

EID: 84889571816     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2505515.2505681     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. M. Ageev, Q. Guo, D. Lagun, and E. Agichtein. (2011). Find it if you can: a game for modeling different types of web search success using interaction data. Proc. SIGIR, 345-354.
2. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S.T. Dumais. (2006). Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. Proc. SIGIR, 19-26.
3. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, S.T. Dumais, and R. Ragno. (2006). Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences. Proc. SIGIR, 3-10
4. A. Aula, R.M. Khan, and Z. Guan. (2010). How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult? Proc. SIGCHI, 35-44.
5. C. Chelba and A. Acero. (2004). Adaptation of maximum entropy capitalizer: little data can help a lot. Proc. EMNLP.
6. C.W. Cleverdon. (1960). ASLIB Cranfield research project on the comparative efficiency of indexing systems. ASLIB Proceedings, XII, 421-431.
7. M. Cole, J. Gwizdka, C. Liu, R., Bierig, N.J. Belkin, and X. Zhang. (2011). Task and user effects on reading patterns in information search. Inter. with Comp., 23: 346-362.
8. H. Daumé III (2007). Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. Proc. ACL, 256-263.
9. A. Diriye, R.W. White, G. Buscher, and S.T. Dumais. (2012). Leaving so soon? Understanding and predicting web search abandonment. Proc. CIKM, 1025-1034.
10. D. Downey, S. Dumais, D. Liebling, and E. Horvitz (2008). Understanding the relationship between searchers' queries and information goals. Proc. CIKM, 449-458.
11. B.S. Everitt. (1992). The Analysis of Contingency Tables. Chapman and Hall, London.
12. H.A. Feild, J. Allan, and R. Jones. (2010). Predicting searcher frustration. Proc. SIGIR, 34-41.
13. S. Fox, K. Karnawat, M. Mydland, S. Dumais, and T. White. (2005). Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM TOIS, 23.
14. Q. Guo, R.W. White, Y. Zhang, B. Anderson, and S. Dumais. (2011). Why searchers switch: understanding and predicting engine switching rationales. Proc. SIGIR, 335-344.
15. A. Hassan, R. Jones, and K.L. Klinkner. (2010). Beyond DCG: user behavior as a predictor of a successful search. Proc. WSDM, 221-230.
16. A. Hassan, Y. Song, and L.-W. He. (2011). A task level metric for measuring web search satisfaction and its application on improving relevance estimation. Proc. CIKM, 125-134.
17. A. Hassan. (2012). A semi-supervised approach to modeling web search satisfaction. Proc. SIGIR, 275-284.
18. C. Hölscher and G. Strube. (2000). Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. Proc. WWW, 337-346
19. S.B. Huffman and M. Hochster. (2007). How well does result relevance predict session satisfaction? Proc. SIGIR, 567-574
20. K. Järvelin and J. Kekalainen. (2002). Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM TOIS, 20(4): 422-446.
21. T. Joachims. (2002). Optimizing search engines using click-through data. Proc. SIGKDD, 132-142.
22. R. Jones and K. Klinkner. (2008). Beyond the session timeout: Automatic hierarchical segmentation of search topics in query logs. Proc. CIKM, 699-708.
23. D. Kelly and N. Belkin. (2004). Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects. Proc. SIGIR, 377-384.
24. D. Kelly and J. Teevan. (2003). Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2).
25. R. Kohavi, R. Longbotham, D. Sommerfield, and R.M. Henne. (2009). Controlled experiments on the web: survey and practical guide. Data Min. Know. Disc., 18(1): 140-181.
26. B. Piwowarski, G. Dupret, and R. Jones. (2009). Mining user web search activity with layered bayesian networks or how to capture a click in its context. Proc. WSDM, 162-171.
27. F. Radlinski, M. Kurup, and T. Joachims. (2008). How does clickthrough data reflect retrieval quality? CIKM, 43-52.
28. P. Serdyukov, G. Dupret, and N. Craswell. (2013). WSCD2013: Workshop on web search click data 2013. Proc. WSDM, 787-788.
29. X. Shen, S. Dumais, and E. Horvitz (2005). Analysis of topic dynamics in web search. Proc. WWW, 1102-1103.
30. E. Voorhees and D. Harman. (2005). TREC: Experiment and Evaluation in Information Retrieval. MIT Press.
31. I. Weber and C. Castillo (2010). The demographics of Web search. Proc. SIGIR, 523-530.
32. R.W. White and S. Dumais. (2009). Characterizing and predicting search engine switching behavior. Proc. CIKM, 87-96
33. R.W. White and J. Huang. (2010). Assessing the scenic route: measuring the value of search trails in web logs. Proc. SIGIR, 587-594.
34. R.W. White and D. Morris. (2007). Investigating the querying and browsing behavior of advanced search engine users. Proc. SIGIR, 255-262.