Predicting searcher frustration

SIGIR 2010 Proceedings - 33rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 34-41

  Feild, Henry ^a   Allan, James ^a   Jones, Rosie ^b  

^a The Manning College of Information and Computer Sciences   (United States)

^b YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Emotional sensors; Query logs; Searcher frustration; User modeling

Indexed keywords

EMOTIONAL SENSORS; INFORMATION SEEKING; PHYSICAL SENSORS; QUERY LOGS; SEARCH STRATEGIES; SEARCHER FRUSTRATION; USER MODELING; USER STUDY;

FORECASTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MODELS; SEARCH ENGINES; SENSORS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 77956041878     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1835449.1835458     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. A. Al-Maskari, M. Sanderson, and P. Clough. The relationship between IR effectiveness measures and user satisfaction. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 773-774, 2007.
2. D. Bilal and J. Kirby. Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users. Info. Proc. and Mngt., 38(5):649-670, 2002.
3. I. Ceaparu, J. Lazar, K. Bessiere, J. Robinson, and B. Shnei-derman. Determining Causes and Severity of End-User Frustration. Intl. J. of HCI, 17(3):333-356, 2004.
4. D. G. Cooper, I. Arroyo, B. P. Woolf, K. Muldner, W. Burleson, and R. Christopherson. Sensor model student self concept in the classroom. In Proc. of UMAP, pages 30-41, June 2009.
5. S. D'Mello, R. Picard, and A. Graesser. Toward an affect-sensitive AutoTutor. IEEE Intel. Sys., pages 53-61, 2007.
6. D. Downey, S. Dumais, and E. Horvitz. Models of searching and browsing: languages, studies, and applications. In Proc. of ICAI, pages 2740-2747, 2007.
7. A. Druin, E. Foss, L. Hatley, E. Golub, M. L. Guha, J. Fails, and H. Hutchinson. How children search the internet with keyword interfaces. In Proc. of IDC, pages 89-96, 2009.
8. S. Fox, K. Karnawat, M. Mydland, S. Dumais, and T. White. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Trans. on Info. Sys., 23(2):147-168, 2005.
9. A. Hassan, R. Jones, and K. L. Klinkner. Beyond DCG: User behavior as a predictor of a successful search. In Proc. of WSDM, pages 221-230, 2010.
10. S. Huffman and M. Hochster. How well does result relevance predict session satisfaction? In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 567-574, 2007.
11. A. Kapoor, W. Burleson, and R. Picard. Automatic prediction of frustration. Intl. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (8):724-736, 2007.
12. C. C. Kuhlthau. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. JASIST, 42(5):361-371, 1991.
13. D. J. Lawrie. Language models for hierarchical summarization. PhD thesis, 2003.
14. M. Smucker, J. Allan, and B. Carterette. A comparison of statistical significance tests for information retrieval evaluation. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 623-632, 2007.
15. R. White, J. Jose, and I. Ruthven. An implicit feedback approach for interactive information retrieval. Info. Proc. and Mngt., 42(1):166-190, 2006. (Pubitemid 41119083)
16. R. W. White and S. T. Dumais. Characterizing and predicting search engine switching behavior. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 87-96, 2009.
17. I. Xie and C. Cool. Understanding help seeking within the context of searching digital libraries. JASIST, 60(3):477-494, 2009.