Object Perception

Blackwell Handbook of Sensation and Perception

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 168-203

  Peterson, Mary A ^a  

^a The University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Contour segregation; Knowledge; Relationships; Research; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889387602     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470753477.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (204)

1. Battelli, L., Casco, C., & Sartori, G. (1997). Dissociation between contour-based and texture-based shape perception: A single case study. Visual Cognition, 4, 275-310.
2. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 141-162.
3. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for the hierarchical encoding of location hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
4. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1994). Parallel computation of symmetry, but not repetition in single visual objects. Visual Cognition, 1, 377-400.
5. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1995). Obligatory edge-assignment in vision: The role of figure-and part-segmentation in symmetry detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1323-1342.
6. Beck, J., Rosenfeld, A., & Ivry, R. (1990). Line segregation. Spatial Vision, 4, 75-101.
7. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
8. Ben-Av, M. B., & Sagi, D. (1995). Perceptual grouping by similarity and proximity: Experimental results can be predicted by intensity autocorrelations. Vision Research, 35, 853-866.
9. Biederman, I. (1985). Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 32, 29-73.
10. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
11. Biederman, I. (1995). Visual object recognition. In S. F. Kosslyn & D. N. Oshershon (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., pp. 121-165). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
13. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: A reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
14. Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64.
15. Binford, T. O. (1981). Inferring surfaces from images. Artificial Intelligence, 17, 205-244.
16. Bloom, P. (1996). Possible individuals in language and cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 90-94.
17. Bloom, P., & Girault, N. (in press). Psychological Science.
18. Boselie, F. (1994). Local and global factors in visual occlusion. Perception, 23, 517-528.
19. Boselie, F., & Leeuwenberg, E. (1986). A test of the minimum principle requires a perceptual coding system. Perception, 15, 331-354.
20. Braddick, O. (1992). Motion may be seen but not used. Current Biology, 2, 597-599.
21. Braun, J. (1993). Shape-from-shading is independent of visual attention and may be a 'texton.' Spatial Vision, 7, 311-322.
22. Braunstein, M. L, Hoffman, D. D., & Saidpour, A. (1989). Parts of visual objects: An experimental test of the minima rule. Perception, 18, 817-826.
23. Brown, J. M., & Weisstein, N. (1988). A spatial frequency effect on perceived depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 157-166.
24. Brown, J. M., Weisstein, N., & May, J. G. (1992). Visual search for simple volumetric shapes. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 40-48.
25. Bruno, N., Bertamini, M., & Domini, F. (1997). Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: Is there a mosaic stage? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1412-1426.
26. Bülthoff, H. H. (1991). Shape from X: Psychophysics and computation. In M. S. Landy & J. A. Movshon (Eds.), Computational models of visual processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
27. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1993). Evaluating object recognition theories by computer psychophysics. In T. A. Poggio & D. A. Glaser (Eds.), Exploring brain functions: Models in neuroscience (pp. 139-164. NY: Wiley.
28. Cassati, R., & Varzi, A. C. (1995). Holes and other superficialities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Cave, C. B., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1993). The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification. Perception, 22, 229-248.
30. Corballis, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95, 115-123.
31. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 71-118. San Diego: Academic Press.
32. Darwin, C. J., & Hukin, R. W. (1999). Auditory objects of attention: The role of interaural time differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 617-629.
33. Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1994). Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system. Nature, 371, 791-793.
34. Dresp, B., & Bonnet, C. (1993). Psychophysical measures of illusory form perception: Further evidence for local mechanisms. Vision Research, 33, 759-766.
35. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 448-456.
36. Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., & Rafal, R. D. (1992). Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature (London), 360, 73-75.
37. Driver, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1991). Can visual neglect operate in object-centered coordinates? An affirmative single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 475-496.
38. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 501-517.
39. Edelman, S., & Weinshall, D. (1991). A self-organizing multiple view representation of 3D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 209-219.
40. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
41. Egly, R., Rafal, R., Driver, J., & Starrveveld, Y. (1994). Covert orienting in the split brain reveals hemispheric specialization for object-based attention. Psychological Science, 5, 380-383.
42. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98, 335-351.
43. Eriksen, B. A., &. Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
44. Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in primate visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 1-47.
45. Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. (1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local "association field." Vision Research, 33, 175-193.
46. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
47. Fox, E. (1998). Perceptual grouping and visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1004-1021.
48. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 669-680.
49. Gibson, B. S., & Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 699-706.
50. Gibson, B. S., & Peterson, M. A. (1994). Does orientation-independent object recognition precede orientation-dependent recognition? Evidence from a cueing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 299-316.
51. Goldsmith, M. (1998). What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 27, 189-219.
52. Gordon, R. D., & Irwin, D. E. (1996). What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1260-1277.
53. Göttschaldt, K. (1926/1938). Gestalt factors and repetition (continued). In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trech, Tubner, and Co., Ltd.
54. Graham, N. V. S. (1989). Visual pattern analyzers. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Graham, N. V. S. (1992). Breaking the visual stimulus into parts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 55-60.
56. Grosof, D. H., Shapley, R. M., & Hawken, M. J. (1993). Macaque V1 neurons can signal illusory contours. Nature, 365, 550-552.
57. Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (1985). Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries and emergent segmentations. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 141-171.
58. Gurnsey, R., Humphrey, G. K., & Kapitan, P. (1992). Parallel discrimination of subjective contours defined by offset gratings. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 263-276.
59. Han, S., Humphreys, G., & Chen L. (1999a). Uniform connectedness and classical Gestalt principles of perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 661-674.
60. Han, S., Humphreys, G. W., & Chen L. (1999b). Parallel and competitive processes in hierarchical analysis: Perceptual grouping and encoding of closure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1411-1432.
61. Harms, L., & Bundeson, C. (1983). Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 11-19.
62. Hayward, W. G. (1998). Effects of outline shape in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 427-440.
63. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
64. He, Z. J., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering. Vision Research, 34, 151-162.
65. Heilman, K. M., & Van Den, A. (1980). Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology, 30, 327-330.
66. Henderson, J. M., & Anes, M. D. (1994). Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 826-839.
67. Hirsch, E. (1982). The concept of identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Hochberg, J. (1968). In the mind's eye. In R. N. Haber (Ed.), Contemporary theory and research in visual perception (pp. 309-331. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
69. Hochberg, J. (1971). Perception I: Color and shape. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.), Woodworth and Schlossberg's experimental psychology, (3rd ed., pp. 395-474). New York: Hold, Rinehart, & Winston.
70. Hochberg, J. (1978). Perception (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
71. Hochberg, J. (1980). Pictorial functions and perceptual structures. In M. A. Hagen (Ed.), The perception of pictures (Vol. 2, pp. 47-93). New York: Academic Press.
72. Hochberg, J. (1998). Gestalt theory and its legacy. In J. Hochberg (Ed.), Perception and cognition at century's end (pp. 253-306. New York: Academic Press.
73. Hochberg, J., and Peterson, M. A. (1993). Mental representations of occluded objects: Sequential disclosure and intentional construal. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 20, 805-820. (Monograph edition published in English in honor of Gaetano Kanizsa.)
74. Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1985). Parts of recognition. In S. Pinker (Ed.), Visual cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Hoffman, D. D., & Singh, M. (1997). Saliende of visual parts. Cognition, 63, 29-78.
76. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 166, 106-154.
77. Hummel, J., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
78. Humphrey, G. K., Symons, L. A., Herbert, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (1996). A neurological dissociation between shape from shading and shape from edges. Behavioral Brain Research, 76, 117-125.
79. Humphreys, G. W. (1981). Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 291-302.
80. Ittelson, W. (1996). Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 171-187.
81. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
82. Jolicoeur, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461-478.
83. Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of Cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84. Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature (London), 290, 91-97.
85. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61. New York: Academic Press.
86. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-215.
87. Kanizsa, G. (1987). Quasi-perceptual margins in homogeneously stimulated fields. In S. Petry & G. Meyer (Eds.), The perception of illusory contours (W. Gerbino, Trans.) (pp. 40-49. New York: Springer-Verlag.
88. Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1976). Convexity and symmetry in figure-ground organization. In M. Henle (Ed.), Vision and artifact. New York: Springer Publishing Co.
89. Kapadia, M. K., Ito, M., Gilbert, C. D., & Westheimer, G. (1995). Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys. Neuron, 15, 843-856.
90. Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.
91. Kellman, P. J., Yin, C., & Shipley, T.F. (1998). A common mechanism for illusory and occluded object completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 859-869.
92. Kennedy, J. M. (1973). Misunderstandings of figure and ground. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 14, 207-209.
93. Kennedy, J. M. (1974). A psychology of picture perception. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
94. Kimchi, R. (1994). The role of wholistic/configural properties versus global properties in visual form perception. Perception, 23, 489-504.
95. Kimchi, R. (1998). Uniform connectedness and grouping in the perceptual organization of hierarchical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
96. Kinsbourne, M., (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica, 33, 193-201.
97. Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (1995). Identifying objects from a haptic glance. Perception & Pychophysics, 57, 1111-1123.
98. Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (1999). The haptic glance: A route to rapid object identification and manipulation. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: Integration of theory and application. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
99. Kobatake, E., & Tanaka, K. (1994). Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71, 856-867.
100. Koffka, K. (1935) Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, Inc.
101. Köhler, W. (1929/1947) Gestalt psychology. New York: New American Library.
102. Kovács, I., & Julesz, B. (1994). Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes. Nature, 370, 25 August, 644-646.
103. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
104. Kurbat, M. (1994). Structural description theories: Is RBC/JIM a general purpose theory of human entry-level object recognition?. Perception, 23, 1339-1368.
105. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T, & Young, M. J. (1990). Psychophysical estimation of the human depth combination rule. Sensor Fusion III: 3-D perception and recognition. SPIE, 1383, 247-254.
106. Leonards, U., Singer, W., & Fahle, M. (1996). The influence of temporal phase differences on texture segmentation. Vision Research, 36, 2689-2697.
107. Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (1997). Effects of background knowledge on object categorization and part detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1153-1169.
108. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bueltoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994). Viewpoint dependent object recognition in monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
109. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
110. Lowe, D. (1985). Perceptual organization and visual recognition. Boston: Kluwer.
111. Lowe, D. (1987). Three-dimensional object recognition from single two-dimensional images. Artificial intelligence, 31, 355-395.
112. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
113. Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., & Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475-501.
114. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
115. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 200, 269-291.
116. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
117. McClelland, J. L. (1985). Putting knowledge in its place: A scheme for programming parallel processing structures on the fly. Cognitive Science, 9, 113-146.
118. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
119. Moore, C., & Cavanagh, P. (1998). Recovery of 3D volume from 2-tone images of novel objects. Cognition, 67, 45-71.
120. Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 339-352.
121. Moore, M. G. (1930). Gestalt vs. experience. American Journal of Psychology, 42, 543-455.
122. Mozer, M. C., Zemel, R. S., Behrmann, M., & Williams, C. K. (1992). Learning to segment images using dynamic feature binding. Neural Computation, 4, 650-665.
123. Mumford, D., Kosslyn, S. M., Hillger, L. A., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1987). Discriminating figure from ground: The role of edge detection and region-growing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 84, 7354-7358.
124. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.
125. O'Shea, R. P., Blackburn, S. G., & Ono, H. (1994). Contrast as a depth cue. Vision Research, 34, 1595-1604.
126. Palmer, S., & Rock, I. (1994a). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
127. Parker, A. J., Cumming, B. G., Johnston, E. B., & Hurlbert, A. C. (1995). Multiple cues for threedimensional shape. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 351-364. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
128. Perrett, D., Smith, P., Potter, D., Mistlin, A., Head, A., Milner, A., & Jeeves, M. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, [Biol], 223, 293-317.
129. Peterhans, E., & von der Heydt, R. (1989). Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 1749-1763.
130. Peterson, M. A. (1994a). Shape recognition can and does occur before figure-ground organization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 105-111.
131. Peterson, M. A. (1994b). The proper placement of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 509-514.
132. Peterson, M. A. (1999). What's in a stage name? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 276-286.
133. Peterson, M. A., de Gelder, B., Rapcsak, S. Z., Gerhardstein, P. C., & Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C. (2000). Object memory effects on figure assignment: Conscious object recognition is not necessary or sufficient. Vision Research, 40, 1549-1567.
134. Peterson, M. A., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (under review). Effects of region-centered attention and object memory on figure assignment.
135. Peterson, M. A., Gerhardstein, P., Mennemeier, M., & Rapcsak, S. V. (1998). Object-centered attentional biases and object recognition contributions to scene segmentation in right hemisphereand left hemisphere-damaged patients. Psychobiology, 26, 557-570.
136. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1993). Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground organization in three-dimensional displays. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 383-429.
137. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994a). Must shape recognition follow figure-ground organization? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 5, 253-259.
138. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994b). Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 551-564.
139. Peterson, M. A., Harvey, E. H., & Weidenbacher, H. L. (1991). Shape recognition inputs to figureground organization: Which route counts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 1075-1089.
140. Peterson, M. A., & Hector, J. E. (1996, November). Evidence for the piecemeal nature of pre-depth object recognition processes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.
141. Peterson, M. A., & Hochberg, J. (1983). Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 183-193.
142. Peterson, M. A., & Hochberg, J. (1989). Necessary considerations for a theory of form perception: A theoretical and empirical reply to Boselie and Leeuwenberg. Perception, 18, 105-119.
143. Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., Bloom, P., & Garrett, M. F. (1996). Space and language. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 553-577. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
144. Poggio, T., & Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
145. Pomerantz, J. R., & Kubovy, M. (1986). Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization: Simplicity and likelihood principles. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and performance, volume II: Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 36:1-46). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
146. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 23-25.
147. Prazdny, K. (1983). Illusory contours are not caused by simultaneous brightness contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 403-404.
148. Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 797-828.
149. Prinzmetal, W. (1981). Principles of feature integration in visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 330-340.
150. Prinzmetal, W. (1995). Visual feature integration in a world of objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 90-94.
151. Ramachandran, V. S. (1988). Perception of shape from shading. Nature (London), 331, 163-166.
152. Rensink, R., & Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
153. Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1987). A case of integrative visual agnosia. Brain, 110, 1431-1462.
154. Robertson, L. C. (1998). Visuospatial attention and cognitive function: Their role in object perception. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
155. Rock, I. (1987). A problem-solving approach to illusory contours. In S. Petry & G. Meyer (Eds.), The perception of illusory contours (pp. 462-70. New York: Springer-Verlag.
156. Rock, I., & Brosgole, L. (1964). Grouping based on phenomenal proximity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 531-538.
157. Rock, I., Linnett, C. M., Grant, P., & Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502-534.
158. Rubin, E. (1958). Figure and ground. In D. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Ed. and Trans.), Readings in perception (pp. 35-101). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. (Original work published 1915.)
159. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests of and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
160. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
161. Saiki, J., & Hummel, J. (1998). Connectedness and the integration of parts with relations in shape perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 227-251.
162. Schyns, P., Goldstone, R. L., & Thilbaut, J-P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 1-54.
163. Sekuler, A. B. (1994). Local and global minima in visual completion: Effects of symmetry and orientation. Perception, 23, 529-545.
164. Sekuler, A. B., & Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
165. Solms, M., Turnbull, O. H., Kaplan-Solms, K., & Miller, P. (1998). Rotated drawing: The range of performance and anatomical correlates in a series of 16 patients. Brain & Cognition, 38, 358-368.
166. Spelke, E. S. (1988). Where perceiving ends and thinking begins: The apprehension of objects in infancy. In A. Yonas (Ed.), Perceptual development in infancy: The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 197-234). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
167. Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29-56.
168. Spelke, E. S., Gutheil, G., & Van de Walle, G. (1995). The development of object perception. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds), Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 2, 2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
169. Stevens, K. A., & Brooks, A. (1988). The concave cusp as determiner of figure-ground. Perception, 17, 35-42.
170. Sun, J., & Perona, P. (1997). Shading and stereo in early perception of shape and reflectance. Perception, 26, 519-529.
171. Suzuki, S., Peterson, M. A., Moscovitch, M., & Berhmann, M. (under review). Identification of one-part and two-part volumetric objects: Selective deficits in coding spatial arrangement of part in visual object agnosia.
172. Tanaka, J. W., & Presnell, L. M. (1999). Color diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1140-1153.
173. Tanaka, K. (1993). Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science, 262, 685-688.
174. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
175. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). Image-based recognition in man, monkey, and machine. Cognition, 67, 1-20.
176. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
177. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
178. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially-directed attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 492-504.
179. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual atten tion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
180. Tittle, J. S., Norman, J. F., Perotti, V. J., & Phillips, F. (1997). The perception of scale-dependent and scale-independent surface structure from binocular disparity, texture, and shading. Perception, 26, 147-166.
181. Tononi, G., Sporns, O., & Edelman, G. M. (1991). Modeling perceptual grouping and figureground segregation by means of active reentrant connections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 129-133.
182. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
183. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
184. Treisman, A., Kahneman, D., & Burkell, J. (1983) Perceptual objects and the costs of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 527-532.
185. Turnbull, O. H., & McCarthy, R. A. (1996). When is a view unusual? A single case study of orientation-dependent visual agnosia. Brain Research Bulletin, 40, 497-503.
186. Ullman, S. (1990). Three-dimensional object recognition. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 50, 1243-1258.
187. Vecera, S. P., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1998). Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: An interactive account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 441-462.
188. Vecera, S. P., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2000). A reply to Peterson. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
189. von der Heydt, R., & Peterhans, E. (1989). Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 1731-1748.
190. Wallach, H., & Slaughter, V. (1988). The role of memory in perceiving subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 101-106.
191. Warrington, E. K. (1982). Neuoropsychological studies of object recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 298, 15-33.
192. Watson, S. E., & Kramer, A. F. (1999). Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 31-49.
193. Westheimer, G. (1999). Gestalt theory reconfigured: Max Wertheimer's anticipation of recent developments in visual neuroscience. Perception, 18, 5-15.
194. Wiggins, D. (1980). Sameness and substance. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
195. Witkin, A. P., & Tenenbaum, J. M. (1983). On the role of structure in vision. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision. NY: Academic Press.
196. Wojciulik, E., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Implicit but not explicit feature binding in a Balint's patient. Visual Cognition, 5, 157-181.
197. Wolfe, J. M., & Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43.
198. Wong, E., & Weisstein, N. (1983). Sharp targets are detected better against a figure, and blurred targets are detected better against a background. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 194-202.
199. Woodworth, E. G. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
200. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-171.
201. Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G.D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45-76. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
202. Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Oxford: Blackwell.
203. Zemel, R. S., Behrmann, M., Mozer, M. C., & Bavelier, D. (under review). Experience-dependent perceptual grouping and object-based attention.
204. Zipser, K., Lamme, V. A. F., & Schiller, P. H. (1996). Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 7376-7389.