Amodal Completion of Partly Occluded Surfaces: Is There a Mosaic Stage?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 1412-1426

  Bruno, Nicola ^a   Bertamini, Marco ^b   Domini, Fulvio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c Università di Trieste ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 0031254519     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1412     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, B. L., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Toward a general theory of stereopsis: Binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion Psychological Review, 101, 414-445.
2. Arend, L. E., & Goldstein, R. (1987). Simultaneous constancy, lightness, and brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 2281-2285.
3. Behrman, M., Zemel, R., & Mozer, M. C. (1994, November). Object-based attention and occlusion. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
4. Bruno, N., & Gerbino, W. (1987). Amodal completion and illusory figures. In S. Petry & G. Meyer (Eds.), The perception of illusory contours (pp. 220-222). New York: Springer.
5. Bush, L. K., Hess, U., & Wolford, G. (1993). Transformations for within-subjects designs: A Monte Carlo investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 566-579.
6. Chang, C., Chatterjee, S., & Kube, P. R. (1991). On an analysis of static occlusion in stereo vision. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, CH2983-5, 722-723.
7. Epstein, W. (1963). Attitudes of judgment and the size-distance invariance Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 78-83.
8. Geiger, D., Ladendorf, B., & Yuille, A. (1992). Occlusions and binocular stereo. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, 3, 425-433.
9. Gerbino, W. (1981). Il ruolo della completezza fenomenica nel riconoscimento tachistoscopico. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 8, 437-452.
10. Gerbino, W., & Salmaso, D. (1987). The effect of amodal completion on visual matching. Acta Psychologies, 65, 25-46.
11. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Gilinsky, A. S. (1955). The effect of attitude upon the perception of size American Journal of Psychology, 68, 173-192.
14. Grossberg, S. (1987). Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: II. Binocular theory. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 117-158.
15. Grossberg, S. (1994). Boundary, brightness, and depth interactions during preattentive representation and attentive recognition of figure and ground. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 20, 771-804.
16. Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (1985). Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 141-171.
17. Kanizsa, G. (1985). Seeing and thinking. Acta Psychologica, 59, 23-33.
18. Kanizsa, G. (1988). Comunicare per immagini: Problemi di lettura percettiva. In L. Cassanelli (Ed.), Linguaggi visivi, storia dell'arte, psicologia della percezione (pp. 11-39). Rome: Multierafica Editrice.
19. Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 167-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Lennie, P., Trevarthen, C., Van Essen, D., & Wässle, H. (1990). Parallel processing of visual information. In L. Spillman & J. S. Werner (Eds.), Visual perception: The neurophysiological foundations (pp. 103-128). New York: Academic Press.
21. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 476-490.
22. Metzger, W. (1941). Psychologie. Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkoppf Verlag.
23. Michotte, A., Thinès, G., & Crabbé, G. (1967). Les complements amodaux des structures perceptives. Louvain, Belgium: Publications Universitaires.
24. Minguzzi, G. (1987). Anomalous figures and the tendency to continuation. In S. Petry & G. E. Meyer (Eds.), The perception of illusory contours (pp. 11-75). New York: Springer.
25. Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (1990). Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research, 11, 1811-1825.
26. Natsoulas, T. (1990). The tunnel effect, Gibson's perception theory, and reflective seeing. Psychological Research, 54, 160-174.
27. Ramachandran, V. S. (1985). The neurobiology of perception. Perception, 14, 97-103.
28. Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Rock, I., & McDermott, W. (1964). The perception of visual angle. Acta Psychologica, 22, 119-134.
30. Sekuler, A. B., & Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
31. Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Real word occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 30, 69-80.
32. Shimojo, S., Silverman, G. H., & Nakayama, K. (1989). Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion. Vision Research, 29, 619-626.
33. Thompson, W. B., & Whillock, R. P. (1988). Occlusion-sensitive matching. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, CH2664-1, 285-289.
34. Toh, P., & Forrest, A. K. (1990). Occlusion detection in early vision. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, CH2934-8, 126-132.
35. Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1993). Information processing models generating lognormally distributed reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 513-525.
36. Wagemans, J., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1988). The effects of kinetic occlusion and categorization on amodal completion: A comment on Gerbino and Salmaso (1987). Acta Psychologica, 72, 281-293.