Rotated drawing: The range of performance and anatomical correlates in a series of 16 patients

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 358-368

  Solms, Mark ^a,d   Turnbull, Oliver H ^b   Kaplan Solms, Karen ^a   Miller, Percy ^c  

^a ST BARTHOLOMEW S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^d ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN DISEASE; BRAIN INJURY; CHILD; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DRAWING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

EID: 0032437417     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1998.1032     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Appelle, S. 1972. Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The 'oblique effect' in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266-278.
2. Aubert, H. 1861. Eine scheinbar bestehende Drehung von Objekten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach Rechts und Links. Archiv fur Pathologie, Anatomie, und Physiologie, 20, 381-383.
3. Biederman, I. 1987. Recognition-by-Components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. Bornstein, M. 1982. Perceptual anisotropies in infancy: Ontogenetic origins and implications of inequalities in spatial vision. Advances in Child Development, 16, 77-123.
5. Charles, N., Froment, C., Rode, G., Vighetto, A., Turgman, F., Trillet, M., & Aimard, G. 1992. Vertigo and upside down vision due to an infarct in the territory of the medial branch of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery caused by dissection of a vertebral artery. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 55, 188-189.
6. Damasio, A., & Damasio, H. 1989. Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Farah, M. J., & Ratcliff, G. 1994. Neuropsychology of high-level vision. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. 1992. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, (15)1, 20-25.
9. Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
10. Mehler, M. 1988. Complete visual inversion in vertebrobasilar ischaemic disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 51, 1236-1237.
11. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. 1993. Visual pathways to perception and action. Progress in Brain Research, 95, 317-337.
12. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. 1995. The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, N. M., Thompson, W. L., Chabris, C. F., Rauch, S. L., & Anderson, A. K. 1994. Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints: A PET investigation. Brain, 117, 1055-1071.
14. Kosslyn, S. M., Flynn, R. A., Amsterdam, J. B., & Wang, G. 1990. Components of high-level vision: A cognitive neuroscience analysis and accounts of neurological syndromes. Cognition, 34, 203-277.
15. Osterrieth, P. 1944. Le test de copie d'une figure complexe. Archives de Psychologie, 30, 206-353.
16. Pillon, B. 1981. Troubles visuo-constructifs et methodes de compensation: Resultats de 85 patients atteints de lesions cerebrales. Neuropsychologia, 19, 375-383.
17. Regard, M., & Landis, T. 1984. Transient global amnesia: Neuropsychological dysfunction during attack and recovery in two 'pure' cases. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 47, 668-672.
18. Rey, A. 1941. L'examen psychologique. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 112-164.
19. Rey, A. 1964. L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
20. Solms, M. 1997. The neuropsychology of dreams: A clinico-anatomical study. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Solms, M., Kaplan-Solms, K., Saling, M., & Miller, P. 1988. Inverted vision after frontal lobe disease. Cortex, 24, 499-509.
22. Stracciari, A., Guarino, M., Ciucci, G., & Pazzaglia, P. 1993. Acute upside down reversal of vision in vertebrobasilar ischaemia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 56, 423.
23. Taylor, L. 1969. Localization of cerebral lesions by psychological testing. Clinical Neurosurgery, 16, 269-287.
24. Teuber, H-L., & Mishkin, M. 1954. Judgement of visual and postural vertical after brain-injury. Journal of Psychology, 38, 161-175.
25. Turnbull, O. H., Laws, K. R., & McCarthy, R. A. 1995. Object recognition without knowledge of object orientation. Cortex, 31, 387-395.
26. Turnbull, O. H. 1996. Rotated drawing and object recognition. Brain and Cognition, 32(2), 120-124.
27. Turnbull, O. H., Beschin, N., & Della Sala, S. 1997a. Agnosia for object orientation: Implications for theories of object recognition. Neuropsychologia, 35, 153-163.
28. Turnbull, O. H., Carey, D. P., & McCarthy, R. A. 1997b. The neuropsychology of object constancy. Journal of the International Neuropsychology Society, 3, 288-298.
29. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. 1982. Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Walsh, K. 1985. Understanding brain damage: A primer of neuropsychological evaluation. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.