Salience of visual parts

Cognition

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 29-78

  Hoffman, Donald D ^a   Singh, Manish ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 0031112555     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00791-3     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Attneave, F. (1971). Multistability in perception. Scientific American, 225(6), 63-71.
2. Bahnsen, P. (1928). Eine untersuchung ueber Symmetrie und asymmetrie bei visuellen wahrnehmungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 108, 355-361.
3. Baylis, G.C., & Driver, J. (1995a). One-sided edge assignment in vision. 1. Figure-ground segmentation and attention to objects. Current Directions in Psychological Silence, 4, 140-146.
4. Baylis, G.C., & Driver, J. (1995b). Obligatory edge assignment in vision: The role of figure and part segmentation in symmetry detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1323-1342.
5. Bennett, B.M., & Hoffman, D.D. (1987). Shape decompositions for visual shape recognition: The role of transversality. In W.A. Richards & S. Ullman (Eds.), Image understanding (pp. 215-256). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Beusmans, J., Hoffman, D.D., & Bennett, B.M. (1987). Description of solid shape and its inference from occluding contours Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 4, 1155-1167.
7. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
8. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E.E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
9. Binford, T.O. (1971, December). Visual perception by computer. IEEE Systems Science and Cybernetics Conference, Miami, FL.
10. Blake, A. (1984). Reconstructing a visible surface. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference 1984 (pp. 362-365). Los Altos, CA: AAAI Press.
11. Blake, A., & Zisserman, A. (1986). Invariant surface reconstruction using weak continuity constraints In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 62-67). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
12. Blake, A., & Zisserman, A. (1987). Visual reconstruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Bower, G.H., & Glass, A.L. (1976). Structural units and the redintegrative power of picture fragments Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 456-466.
14. Brady, M., & Asada, H. (1984). Smoothed local symmetries and their implementation. International Journal of Robotics Research, 3, 36-61.
15. Braunstein, M.L., Hoffman, D.D., & Saidpour, A. (1989). Parts of visual objects: An experimental test of the minima rule. Perception, 18, 817-826.
16. Brooks, R.A. (1981). Symbolic reasoning among 3-D models and 2-D images. Artificial Intelligence, 17, 205-244.
17. Cave, C.B., & Kosslyn, S.M. (1993). The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification. Perception, 22, 229-248.
18. Cornilleau-Peres, V, & Droulez, J. (1989). Visual perception of surface curvature: Psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 351-364.
19. Dickinson, S.J., Pentland, A.P., & Rosenfeld, A. (1992). From volumes to views: An approach to 3D object recognition. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing: Image Understanding, 55(2), 130-154.
20. Do Carmo, M. (1976). Differential geometry of curves and surfaces Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Driver, J., & Baylis, G.C. (1995). One-sided edge assignment in vision. 2. Part decomposition, shape description, and attention to objects Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 201-206.
22. Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (1991). Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings Psychological Review, 98, 335-351.
23. Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (1992). A model for the rapid interpretation of line drawings in early vision. In D. Brogan (Ed.), Visual search II (pp. 73-89). London: Taylor and Francis.
24. Enns, J.T., & Rensink, R.A. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
25. Crimson, W.E.L. (1981). From images to surfaces: A computational study of the human early visual system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26. Guillemin, V., & Pollack, A. (1974). Differential topology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. Guzman, A. (1971). Analysis of curved line drawings using context and global information. In Machine intelligence (Vol. 6). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
28. Halmos, P.R. (1950). Measure theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. Hochberg, J. (1964). Perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30. Hoffman, D.D. (1983a). Representing shapes for visual recognition. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
31. Hoffman, D.D. (1983b). The interpretation of visual illusions. Scientific American, 249(6), 154-162.
32. Hoffman, D.D., & Richards, W.A. (1982). Representing smooth plane curves for recognition: Implications for figure-ground reversal. Proceedings of the National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (pp. 5-8). Los Altos, CA: Kaufmann.
33. Hoffman, D.D., & Richards, WA. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96.
34. Kanisza, G., & Gerbino, W. (1976). Convexity and symmetry in figure-ground organization. In M. Henle (Ed.), Art and artefacts (pp. 25-32). New York: Springer.
35. Kimia, B.B., Tannenbaum, A.R., & Zucker, S.W. (1990). Toward a computational theory of shape: An overview. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 427, 402-407.
36. Kimia, B.B., Tannenbaum, A.R., & Zucker, S.W. (1991). Entropy scale-space (pp. 333-344). New York: Plenum Press.
37. Kimia, B.B., Tannenbaum, A.R., & Zucker, S.W. (1992). The shape triangle: Parts, protrusions, and bends (Tech. Rep. No. TR-92-15). Montreal: McGill University Research Center for Intelligent Machines.
38. Koenderink, J.J. (1984). The structure of images Biological Cybernetics, 50, 363-370.
39. Koenderink, J.J. (1986). Optic flow. Vision Research, 26, 161-179.
40. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
41. Kurbat, M.A. (1994). Structural description theories Is RBC/JIM a general-purpose theory of human entry-level object recognition? Perception, 23, 1339-1368.
42. Leyton, M. (1987). Symmetry-curvature duality. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 38, 327-341.
43. Leyton, M. (1988). A process grammar for shape. Artificial Intelligence, 34, 213-247.
44. Leyton, M. (1989). Inferring causal history from shape. Cognitive Science, 13, 357-387.
45. Leyton, M. (1992). Symmetry, causality, mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Lowe, D. (1985). Perceptual organization and visual recognition. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
47. Marr, D. (1977). Analysis of occluding contour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 197, 441-475.
48. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman Press.
49. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H.K. (1978). Representation and recognition of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 200, 269-294.
50. Marroquin, J. (1985). Probabilistic solution of inverse problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
51. Norman, J.F., & Lappin, J.S. (1992). The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 386-396.
52. Norman, J.F., & Todd, J.T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 279-291.
53. Palmer, S.E. (1975). Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory cognitive interaction. In D.A. Norman & D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 279-307). San Francisco: Freeman.
54. Palmer, S.E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 441-474.
55. Parent, P., & Zucker, S.W. (1989). Trace inference, curvature consistency, and curve detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 823-839.
56. Pentland, A.P. (1986). Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form. Artificial Intelligence, 28, 293-331.
57. Peterson, M.A., & Gibson, B.S. (1993). Shape recognition inputs to figure ground organization in three-dimensional displays. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 383-429.
58. Reed, S.K. (1974). Structural descriptions and the limitations of visual images Memory and Cognition, 2, 329-336.
59. Richards, W.A., & Hoffman, D.D. (1985). Codon constraints on dosed 2D shapes. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31, 156-177.
60. Richards, WA., Dawson, B., & Whittington, D. (1986). Encoding contour shape by curvature extrema. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 3, 1483-1489.
61. Richards, W.A., Koenderink, J., & Hoffman, D.D. (1987). Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 4, 1168-1175.
62. Roberts, L.G. (1965). Machine perception of three-dimensional solids In J.T. Tippett et al. (Eds.), Optical and electrooptical information processing (pp. 211-277). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Rogers, B.J. (1986). The perception of surface curvature from disparity and motion parallax cues. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 27, 181.
64. Rogers, B.J., & Cagenello, R. (1989). Disparity curvature and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Nature, 339, 135-137.
65. Rogers, B.J., & Collett, T.S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 697-717.
66. Rogers, B.J., & Graham, M.E. (1983). Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Science, 221, 1409-1411.
67. Rubin, E. (1958). Figure and ground. In D.C. Beardslee (Ed.), Readings in perception (pp. 194-203). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. (Reprinted from Visuell wahrgenommene figuren, 1915, Copenhagen: Gyldenalske Boghandel).
68. Saidpour, A., & Braunstein, M.L. (1994). Curvature and depth judgments of the same simulated shape from motion parallax and structure from motion. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 35, 1316.
69. Siddiqi, K., & Kimia, B.B. (1995). Parts of visual form: Computational aspects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17, 239-251.
70. Siddiqi, K., Tresness, K.J., & Kimia, B.B. (1996). Parts of visual form: Psychophysical aspects. Perception, 25, 399-424.
71. Singh, M., Seyranian, G., & Hoffman, D.D. (1996). Cuts for parsing visual shapes. University of California, Irvine. Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences Memo, 96-33.
72. Stevens, K.A., & Brookes, A. (1988). The concave cusp as a determiner of figure-ground. Perception, 17, 35-42.
73. Sutherland, N.S. (1968). Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 171, 297-317.
74. Terzopoulos, D. (1984). Multi-level computation of visual surface representation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
75. Terzopoulos, D. (1986). Integrating visual information from multiple sources. In A.P. Pentland (Ed.), From pixels to predicates: Recent advances in computational vision (pp. 111-142). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
76. Terzopoulos, D., Witkin, A., & Kass, M. (1987). Symmetry-seeking modelsand 3D object reconstruction. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 211-221.
77. Triesman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
78. Todd, J.T. (1984). The perception of three-dimensional structure from rigid and nonrigid motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 97-103.
79. Todd, J.T., & Norman, J.F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 509-523.
80. Todd, J.T., Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J., and Kappers, A.M.L. (1996). Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance, 22, 695-706.
81. Tversky, B., & Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 169-193.
82. Waltz, D. (1975). Generating semantic descriptions from drawings of scenes with shadows. In P. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 19-91). New York: McGraw-Hill.
83. Weiss, I. (1990). Shape reconstruction on a varying mesh. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12, 345-362.
84. Wenderoth, P. (1994). The salience of vertical symmetry. Perception, 23, 221-236.
85. Wilson, H.R., & Richards, WA. (1985). Discrimination of contour curvature: Data and theory. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 2(7), 1191-1198.
86. Wilson, H.R., & Richards, WA. (1989). Mechanism of contour curvature discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A, 6(1), 1006-1115.
87. Winston, P.A. (1975). Learning structural descriptions from examples. In P.H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 157-209). New York: McGraw-Hill.
88. Witkin, A.P. (1983). Scale-space filtering. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Karlsruhe, pp. 1019-1021.
89. Witkin, A.P., & Tenenbaum, J.M. (1983). On the role of structure in vision. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 481-543). New York: Academic Press.
90. Wolfe, J.M., Yee, A., & Friedman-Hill, S.R. (1992). Curvature is a basic feature for visual search tasks. Perception, 21, 465-480.