Prevention and treatment of demineralisation during fixed appliance therapy: A review of current methods and future applications

British Dental Journal

Volumn 215, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 505-511

  Chambers, C ^a,b   Stewart, S ^c   Su, B ^a   Sandy, J ^a   Ireland, A ^a  

^a BRISTOL DENTAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c MUSGROVE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BIOMATERIAL; FLUORIDE; GLASS IONOMER;

ADVERSE EFFECTS; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKET; PROCEDURES; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL CARIES; FLUORIDES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION; TOOTH REMINERALIZATION;

EID: 84888366354     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1094     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Lovrov S, Hertrich K, Hirschfelder U. Enamel demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment-incidence and correlation to various oral-hygiene parameters. J Orofac Orthop 2007; 68: 353-363.
2. Balenseifen W, Madonia J V. Study of dental plaque in orthodontic patients. J Dent Res 1970; 49: 320-324.
3. Øgaard B. White spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: mechanisms and fluoride preventive aspects. Semin Orthod 2008; 14: 183-193.
4. Lundstrom F, Krasse B. Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli frequency in orthodontic patients: the effect of chlorhexidine treatments. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 109-116.
5. Sukontapatipark W, El-Agroudi M A, Selliseth N J, Thunold K, Selvig K A. Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 475-484.
6. Øgaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances andenamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94: 68-73.
7. Gorelick L, Geiger A M, Gwinnett A J. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 93-98.
8. Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-year-olds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treated persons 5 years after treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 423-427.
9. Artun J, Brobakken B O. Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multibanded appliances. Eur J Orthod 1987; 8: 229-234.
10. Banks P A, Chadwick S M, Asher-McDade C, Wright J L. Fluoride releasing elastomerics -a prospective controlled trial. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 401-407.
11. Nield-Gehrig J S, Willmann D E. Foundations of periodontics for the dental hygienist. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.
12. Periasamy S, Paul E. Kolenbrander P E. Mutualistic biofilm communities develop with porphyromonas gingivalis and initial, early, and late colonizers of enamel. J Bacteriol 2009; 191: 6804-6811.
13. Sari E, Birinci I. Microbiological evaluation of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouth rinse in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 881-884.
14. McDonnell G, Denver Russell A. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12: 147-179.
15. Marsh P D. Contemporary perspective on plaque control. Br Dent J 2012; 212: 601-606.
16. ten Cate J M. Contemporary perspective on the use of fluoride products in caries prevention. Br Dent J 2013; 214: 161-167.
17. Haugejorden O, Lervik T, Birkeland J M, Jorkjend L. An 11-year follow-up study of dental caries after discontinuation of school-based fluoride programmes. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 257-263.
18. Department of Health. Delivering better oral health: an evidence-based toolkit for prevention. 2nd ed. London: DH, 2009.
19. Benson P E, Parkin N, Millett D T, Dyer F, Vine S, Shah A. Fluorides for the prevention of white spots on teeth during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD003809.
20. Stecksén-Blicks C, Renfors G, Oscarson N G, Bergstrand F, Twetman S. Caries-preventive effectiveness of a fluoride varnish: a randomized controlled trial in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances. Caries Res 2007; 41: 455-459.
21. Kitasako Y, Sadr A, Hamba H, Ikeda M, Tagami J. Gum containing calcium fluoride reinforces enamel subsurface lesions in situ. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 370-375.
22. Puig Silla M, Montiel Company J M, Almerich Silla J M. Use of chlorhexidine varnishes in preventing and treating periodontal disease: a review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13: E257-260.
23. Mohammadi Z, Abbott P V. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 288-302.
24. Ogaard B, Larsson E, Henriksson T, Birkhed D, Bishara S E. Effects of combined aapplication of antimicrobial and fluoride varnishes in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120: 28-35.
25. Attin R, Ilse A, Werner C, Wiegand A, Attin T. Antimicrobial effectiveness of a highly concentrated Chlorohexidine varnish treatment in teenagers with fixed orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 1022-1027.
26. Tewtman S, Persson L G. Interdental caries incidence and progression in relation to mutans streptococci suppression after chlorohexidine-thymol varnish treatments in school children. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57: 144-148.
27. Madlena M, Vitalyos G, Marton S, Nagy G. The effect of chlorohexidine varnish on bacterial levels in plaque and saliva during orthodontic treatment. J Clin Dent 2000; 11: 42-46.
28. Marcusson A, Norevall L I, Persson M. White spot reduction when using glass ionomer cement for bonding in orthodontics: a longitudinal and comparative study. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 233-242.
29. Wiltshire W A. Shear bond strengths of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 106: 127-130.
30. Rix D, Foley T F, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 36-42.
31. Chitnis D, Dunn W J, Gonzales D A. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 330.
32. Owens Jr S E, Miller B H. A comparison of shear bond strengths of three visible light-cured orthodontic sdhesives. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 352-356.
33. Newman G V, Newman R A, Sengupta A K. Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 256-262.
34. Choo S C, Ireland A J, Sherriff M. An in vivo investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements as orthodontic bonding agents. Eur J Orthod 2001 23: 403-409.
35. Cheng H Y, Chen C H, Li C L, Tsai H H, Chou T H, Wang W N. Bond strength of orthodontic light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 180-184.
36. Bishara S E, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren J J. Effect of antimicrobial monomer-containing adhesive on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 397-299.
37. Millett D T, McCluskey L A, McAuley F, Creanor S L, Newell J, Love J. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 233-240
38. Spencera C G, Campbell P M, Buschang P H, Cai J, Honeyman A L. Antimicrobial effects of zinc oxide in an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod 2009; 79:317-322
39. Ahluwalia P, Chopra S, Thomas A M. Strength characteristics and marginal sealing ability of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012; 30: 41-46.
40. Tinsley D, O'Dwyerr J J, Benson P E. Fluoridated elastomerics: in vivo versus in vitro fluoride release. J Orthod 2003; 30: 317-322.
41. Banks P A, Chadwick S M, Asher-McDade C, Wright J L. Fluoride-releasing elastomerics; a prospective controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 401-407.
42. Mattick C R, Mitchell L, Chadwick S M, Wright J. Fluoride-releasing elastomeric modules reduce decalcification: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthod 2001; 28: 217-219.
43. Storie D J, Regennitter F, von Fraunhofer J A. Characteristics of a fluoride-releasing elastomeric chain. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 199-209.
44. Wiltshire W A. Determination of fluoride from fluoride-releasing elastomeric ligature ties. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 383-387.
45. Toumba K J, Al-Ibrahim N S, Curzon M E. A review of slow-release fluoride devices. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009; 10: 175-182.
46. Ryu H S, Bae I H, Lee K G et al. Antibacterial effect of silver-platinum coating for orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 151-157.
47. Fan C, Chu L, Rawls H R, Norling B K, Cardenas H L, Whang K. Development of an antimicrobial resin-a pilot study. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 322-328.
48. Imazato S, Ebi N, Takahashi Y, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell R R. Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3605-3609.
49. Al-Musallam T, Evans C, Drummond J, Matasa C, Wu C. Antimicrobial properties of an orthodontic adhesive combined with cetylpyridinium chloride. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 245-251.
50. Paschos E, Kurochkina N, Huth K C, Hansson C S, Rudzki-Janson I. Failure rate of brackets bonded with antimicrobial and fluoride-releasing, self-etching primer and the effect on prevention of enamel demineralization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 613-620.
51. 2 photocatalytic film through cold spray. Appl Surf Sci 2008; 254: 3979-3982.
52. Yu J, Yu H, Cheng B, Zhao X, Zhang Q J. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of mesoporous anatase TiO2 nanofibres by a hydrothermal method. J Photoch Photobio A 2006; 182: 121-127.
53. Suketa N, Sawase T, Kitaura H et al. An antibacterial surface on dental implants, based on the photocatalytic bactericidal effect. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 105-111.
54. Shah A G, Shetty P C, Ramachandra C S, Bhat N S, Laxmikanth S M. In vitro assessment of photocatalytic titanium oxide surface modified stainless steel orthodontic brackets for antiadherent and antibacterial properties against Lactobacillus acidophilus. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 1028-1035.
55. 2 coated orthodontic brackets against S. Mutans and C. Albicans Biotechnol Bioproc E 2010; 15: 680-685.
56. Chun M J, Shim E, Kho E H et al. Surface modification of orthodontic wires with photocatalytic titanium oxide for its antiadherent and antibacterial properties. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 483-488.
57. Welch K, Cai Y, Engqvist H, Strømme M. Dental adhesives with bioactive and on-demand bactericidal properties. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 491-499.
58. Zhanga Z L, Wanc M, Ma Y L. Enhanced photovoltaic effect of TiO2-based composite ZnFe2O4/TiO2. J Photoch Photobio A 2012; 233: 15-19.
59. Liu S X, Qu Z P, Han X W, Sun C L. A mechanism for enhanced photocatalytic activity of silver-loaded titanium dioxide. Catalysis Today 2004; 9395: 877-884.
60. Sevinc B A, Hanley L. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticle. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 94: 22-31.
61. Xia Y, Zhang F M, Xie H F, Gu N. Nanoparticle-reinforced resin-based dental composites. J Dent 2008; 36: 450-455.
62. Szepes A, Farkas Z, Kovács J, Szabó-Révész P, Ulrich J et al. Freeze casting technique in the development of solid drug delivery systems. Chem Eng Process 2007; 46: 230-238.
63. Silverstone L M, Hicks M J, Featherstone M J. Dynamic factors affecting lesion initiation and progression in human dental enamel. Part 1, the dynamic nature of enamel caries, Quintessence Int 1988; 19: 683-711.
64. ten Cate J M. Review on fluoride, with special emphasis on calcium and fluoride mechanisms in caries prevention. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105: 461-465.
65. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demieralisation. Part 2: prevention and treatment of lesions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93: 123-128.
66. O'reilly M M, Featherstone J B. Demineralisation and remineralisation around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 92: 33-40.
67. Manning R H, Edgar W M, Amalamanyi E. Effects of chewing gums sweetened with sorbitol or a sorbitol/xylitol mixture on the remineralisation of human enamel lesions in situ. Caries Res 1992; 26: 104-109.
68. Arends J, Christofferson J, Petersson L G. Influence of xylitol on demineralisation of enamel. Caries Res 1984; 18: 403-413.
69. Reynolds E C, Riley P F, Storey E. Phosphoprotein inhibition of hydroxyapatite dissolution. Calcified Tissue Int 1982; 34(Suppl 2): s52-56.
70. Reynolds E C. Remineralisation of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide stabilized calcium phosphate solutions. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1587-1595.
71. Cochrane S, Saranthan F, Cai K J, Cross E C, Reynolds N J. Subsurface lesion remineralisation with casein phosphopeptide stabilized solutions of calcium, phosphate and flouride. Caries Res 2008; 42: 88-97.
72. Reynold E C, Cai F, Shen P, Walker G. Retention in plaque and remineralisation of enamel lesions by various forms of calcium in a mouthrinse or sugar free chewing gum. J Dent Res 2003; 83: 206-211.
73. Morgan M V, Adams G G, Bailey D L, Tsao C E, Reynolds EC. CPP-ACP gum slows progression and enhances regression of dental caries. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 2445.