A Comparative Clinical Trial of a Compomer and a Resin Adhesive for Orthodontic Bonding

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 233-240

  Millett, D T ^a   McCluskey, L A ^a   McAuley, F ^a   Creanor, S L ^a   Newell, J ^b   Love, J ^b  

^a GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Compomer; Decalcification; Resin adhesive; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; COMPOMER; DYRACT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; RIGHT-ON; SILICATE;

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RIGHT ON; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; COMPOMERS; DENTAL BONDING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHACRYLATES; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESIN CEMENTS; SEX FACTORS; SILICATES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION;

EID: 0034200949     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling material to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34: 849-853.
2. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments. Progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:901-912.
3. Zachrisson BU. A post-treatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:173-189.
4. Mizrahi E. Orthodontic bands and directly bonded brackets: a review of clinical failure rate. J Dent. 1983;1:231-236.
5. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:476-483.
6. Newman GV. A post-treatment survey of direct bonding of metal brackets. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:197-206.
7. Millett DT, Gordon PH. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a no-mix resin adhesive (Right-On). Eur J Orthod. 1994;16: 203-211.
8. Lovius BB, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light-activated bonding material over an 18-month period. Br J Orthod. 1987;16:11-20.
9. O'Brien KD, Read MJF, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:348-351.
10. Cooper RB, Goss M, Hamula W. Direct bonding with light-cured adhesive precoated brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:477-479.
11. Ash S, Hay N. Adhesive pre-coated brackets: a comparative clinical study. Br J Orthod. 1996;23:325-329.
12. Thompson RE, Way DC. Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:282-295.
13. Brown CRL, Way DC. Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:663-671.
14. Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding using filled and unfilled resins using various clean up techniques. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:269-283.
15. Øgaard B, Rolla G, Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:68-73.
16. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: an overview. Br J Orthod. 1992;19:199-205.
17. Hotz P, McLean JW, Sced I, Wilson AD. The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates. Br Dent J. 1977; 142:41-47.
18. Millett DT, McCabe JF. Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement: a review. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:385-399.
19. Ostman-Andersson E, Marcusson A, Horstedt P. Comparative SEM studies of the enamel surfaces after debonding following the use of glass ionomer cement and acrylic resin for bracket bonding. Swed Dent J. 1993;7:139-146.
20. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J. 1991;15:253-258.
21. Creanor SL, Carruthers LMC, Saunders WP, Strang R, Foye RH. Fluoride uptake and release characteristics of glass ionomer cements. Caries Res. 1994;28:322-328.
22. Marcusson A, Norevall L-I, Persson M. White spot reduction when using glass ionomer cement for bonding in orthodontics: a longitudinal and comparative study. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:233-242.
23. McCabe JF. Resin modified glass ionomers. Biomaterials. 1998; 19:521-527.
24. Eberhard H, Hirschfelder U, Sindel J. Compomers - a new bracket bonding generation in orthodontics? J Orofacial Orthop. 1997; 58:62-69.
25. Verbeeck RMH, DeMaejer EAP, Marks LAM, DeMoor RJG, DeWitte AMJC, Trimpeneers LM. Fluoride release process of (resin-modified) glass-ionomer cements versus (polyacid-modified) composite resins. Biomaterials. 1998;19:509-519.
26. Forsten L. Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomer and related materials and its clinical effect Biomaterials. 1998;19:503-508.
27. Chung CK, Millett DT, Creanor SL, Gilmour WH, Foye RH. Fluoride release and cariostatic ability of a compomer and a resin modified glass ionomer cement used for orthodontic bonding. J Dent. 1998;26:533-538.
28. Rock WP, Abdullah MSB. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light-cured orthodontic adhesives. J Dent. 1997;25:243-249.
29. Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 1999;69: 58-64.
30. Haydar B, Sartkaya S, Cehreh ZC. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:458-462.
31. Miller RA. A light-cured hybrid compomer for bonding to impacted canines. J Clin Orthod. 1996;30:331-333.
32. Silness P, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964;2:121-135.
33. Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett G, Griswold PG. The effect of a fluoride programme on white spot formation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:29-37.
34. Woolson R, O'Gorman T. A comparison of several tests for paired censored data. Stat Med. 1992;11:193-208.
35. Segal MR. Regression lines for censored data. Biometrics. 1988; 44:35-47.
36. Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis - Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1997.
37. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
38. Norevall L-I, Marcusson A, Persson M. A clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared to acrylic resin. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:373-384.
39. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: An in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:463-469.
40. Miller JR, Mancl L, Arbuckle G, Baldwin J, Phillips RW. A three-year clinical trial using a glass ionomer cement for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:309-312.
41. Fricker JP. A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-cured glass polyakenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:502-5.
42. Millett DT, Nunn JH, Welbury RR, Gordon PH. Decalcification in relation of brackets bonded with glass ionomer cement or a resin adhesive. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:65-70.
43. Primosch RE, Weatherall JA, Strong M. Distribution of retention of salivary fluoride from a sodium fluoride tablet following various intra-oral dissolution methods. J Dent Res. 1986;65:1001-1005.
44. Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Fluoride concentration in plaque adjacent to orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Caries Res. 1993;27:51-54.
45. Millett DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, Robertson M, Love J. A clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:351-356.
46. Marks LAM, Weerheijm KL, van Amerohgen WE, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Dyract versus Tytin class 11 restorations in primary molars: 36 months' evaluation. Caries Res. 1999;33:387-392.
47. Underwood M, Rawls R, Zimmerman B. Clinical evaluation of a fluoride-exchanging resin as an orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;86:93-99.
48. Sonis A, Snell W. An evaluation of a fluoride-releasing visible-light activated system for orthodontic bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:423-427.
49. Mitchell L. An investigation into the effects of a fluoride-releasing adhesive on the prevalence of enamel changes with directly bonded orthodontic attachments. Br J Orthod. 1992;19:207-214.
50. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:231-236.