An in vivo investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements as orthodontic bonding agents

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 403-409

  Choo, Soo Ching ^c   Ireland, A J ^a   Sherriff, M ^b  

^a ROYAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3M MULTI CURE; 3M MULTI-CURE; ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FUJI ORTHO LC; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; EQUIPMENT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK; STATISTICS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MOLAR; ODDS RATIO; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; TOOTH MOVEMENT;

EID: 0035431397     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/23.4.403     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Altman D G 1991 Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London
2. Ashcraft D B, Staley R N, Jakobsen J R 1997 Fluoride release and shear bond strengths of three light-cured glass poly(alkenoate) cements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 111: 260-265
3. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B 1998 Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 1: wetting with water. Clinical Orthodontic Research 1: 29-36
4. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B 1999 Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2: bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva. Clinical Orthodontic Research 2: 186-193
5. Choo S C, Ireland A J, Sherriff M 2001 An ex vivo investigation into the use of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements as orthodontic bonding agents. European Journal of Orthodontics 23: 243-252
6. Cook P A 1990 Direct bonding with glass poly(alkenoate) cement. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 8: 509-511
7. Cook P A, Youngson C C 1988 An in vitro study of the bond strength of a glass poly(alkenoate) cement in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. British Journal of Orthodontics 15: 247-253
8. Copenhover D J 1986 In vitro comparison of glass ionomer cement's ability to inhibit decalcification under orthodontic bands. American Journal of Orthodontics 89: 528 (Abstract)
9. Fajen V B, Duncanson M G Jr, Nanda R S, Currier G F, Angolkar P V 1990 An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass poly(alkenoate) cements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97: 316-322
10. Fricker J P 1992 A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 101: 381-384
11. Fricker J P 1994 A 12-month clinical evaluation of a light-activated glass poly(alkenoate) cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 105: 502-505
12. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G 1991 Fluoride release from glass poly(alkenoate) cement in vivo and in vitro. Swedish Dental Journal 15: 253-258
13. Lovius B B J, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A 1987 A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18-month period. British Journal of Orthodontics 14: 11-20
14. Messersmith M L, Devine S M, Zionic A E 1997 Effects of tooth surface preparation on the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cements. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 31: 503-509
15. Millett D T, Nunn J H, Welbury R R, Gordon P H 1999 Decalcification in relation to brackets bonded with glass ionomer cement or a resin adhesive. Angle Orthodontist 69: 65-70
16. Mount G J (ed.) 1990 Description of glass-ionomer cements. In: An atlas of glass-ionomer cements: a clinician's guide. Harper and Row, Philadelphia, pp. 1-24
17. Øen J O, Gjerdet N R, Wisth P J 1991 Glass poly(alkenoate) cements used as bonding materials for metal orthodontic brackets. An in vitro study. European Journal of Orthodontics 13: 187-191
18. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke R S, Silverman M 1995 A new light-cured glass poly(alkenoate) cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 108: 231-236
19. Wilson A D, Kent B E 1972 A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass poly(alkenoate) cement. British Dental Journal 132: 133-135
20. Wong T C C, Bryant R W 1985 Glass poly(alkenoate) cements: dispensing and strength. Australian Dental Journal 30: 336-340
21. Zachrisson B U 1977 A post treatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics 71: 173-189