Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 22-31

  Sevinç, Berdan Aydin ^a   Hanley, Luke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Antimicrobial; Biofilm; Dental craniofacial material; Nanomaterials nanophase; ZnO

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ANTI-BACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; BACTERIAL BIOFILM; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIAL POPULATION; BIOFILM FORMATION; BIOFILM GROWTH; CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY; DENTAL/CRANIOFACIAL MATERIAL; DIRECT CONTACT INHIBITION; INHIBITORY ACTIVITY; MICROSCOPY DEMONSTRATED; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; RESIN-BASED DENTAL COMPOSITES; SECONDARY CARIES; SINGLE-SPECIES MODELS; THIRD GENERATION; VIABLE COUNT; ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES; ZNO;

BACTERIA; BACTERIOLOGY; BIOFILMS; BIOFILTERS; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; NANOPARTICLES; RESINS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ZINC; ZINC OXIDE;

DENTAL COMPOSITES;

DENTAL ALLOY; NANOPARTICLE; ZINC OXIDE;

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BIOFILM; CONTACT INHIBITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; NONHUMAN; STREPTOCOCCUS SOBRINUS; TOOTH FILLING;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOFILMS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; NANOPARTICLES; POLYURETHANES; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 77954103832     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31620     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Zalkind MM, Keisar O, Ever-Hadani P, Grinberg R, Sela MN. Accumulation of Streptococcus mutans on light-cured composites and amalgam: An in vitro study. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:187-190.
2. Beyth N, Domb AJ, Weiss E. An in vitro quantitative antibacterial analysis of amalgam and composite resins. J Dent 2007;35: 201-206.
3. Günyakti N, Gür G, Misirligil A. In vivo adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on amalgam and composite restorative materials. Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg 1990;17:83-86.
4. Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:48-53.
5. Hahn R, Weiger R, Netuschil L, Brüch M. Microbial accumulation and vitality on different restorative materials. Dent Mater 1993;9: 312-316.
6. Sousa RP, Zanin IC, Lima JP, Vasconcelos SM, Melo MA, Beltrão HC, Rodrigues LK. In situ effects of restorative materials on dental biofilm and enamel demineralisation. J Dent 2009;37:44-51.
7. Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, Bell TJ, Healy A, Mark B, McBirnie R, Osborne-Smith KL. One-year retrospective clinical evaluation of hybrid composite restorations placed in United Kingdom general practices. Quintess Inter 2001;32:293-298.
8. Imazato S, Ebi N, Takahashi Y, Kaneko T, Ebisu S, Russell RRB. Antibacterial activity of bactericide-immobilized filler for resin-based restoratives. Biomater 2003;24:3605-3609.
9. Leung D, Spratt DA, Pratten J, Gulabivala K, Mordan NJ, Young AM. Chlorhexidine-releasing methacrylate dental composite materials. Biomater 2005;26:7145-7153.
10. Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA, Kerper S. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of restorative materials combined with chlorhexidines. J Oral Rehab 1983;10:373-381. (Pubitemid 14240342)
11. Kawashita M, Tsuneyama S, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Kozuka H, Yamamoto K. Antibacterial silver-containing silica glass prepared by sol-gel method. Biomater 2000;21:393-398. (Pubitemid 30035469)
12. 2 filler on oral streptococci. Dent Mater 1996;12:227-229.
13. Syafiuddin T, Hisamitsu H, Toko T, Igarashi T, Goto N, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T. In vitro inhibition of caries around a resin composite restoration containing antibacterial filler. Biomaterials 1997;18: 1051-1057.
14. Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995;6:302-318.
15. Kelley JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75: 18-32. (Pubitemid 126654378)
16. Bowen RL, Cleek GW. A new series of X-ray-opaque reinforcing fillers for composite materials. J Dent Res 1972;51:177-182.
17. Fang M, Chen J-H, Xu X-L, Yang P-H, Hildebrand HF. Antibacterial activities of inorganic agents on six bacteria associated with oral infections by two susceptibility tests. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006;27:513-517. (Pubitemid 43767082)
18. 2 and ZnO water suspensions. Water Sci Technol 2006;54:327-334.
19. Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KD, Manna AC. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008;279:71-76. (Pubitemid 350308551)
20. de Soet JJ, van Loveren C, Lammens AJ, Pavicić MJ, Homburg CH, ten Cate JM, de Graaff J. Differences in cariogenicity between fresh isolates of Streptococcus sobrinus and Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 1991;25:116-122.
21. Grönroos L, Mättö J, Saarela M, Luoma AR, Luoma H, Jousimies-Somer H, Pyhälä L, Asikainen S, Alaluusua S. Chlorhexidine susceptibilities of mutans streptococcal serotypes and ribotypes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:894-898.
22. Kolenbrander PE, Andersen RN, Blehert DS, Egland PG, Foster JS, Palmer RJ. Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002;66:486-505.
23. Takenaka S, Trivedi HM, Corbin A, Pitts B, Stewart PS. Direct visualization of spatial and temporal patterns of antimicrobial action within model oral biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74: 1869-1875. (Pubitemid 351400142)
24. Guggenheim B, Giertsen E, Schupbach P, Shapiro S. Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque. J Dent Res 2001;80:363-370. (Pubitemid 32501339)
25. Stoimenov PK, Klinger RL, Marchin GL, Klabunde KJ. Metal oxide nanoparticles as bactericidal agents. Langmuir 2002;18: 6679-6686. (Pubitemid 35383306)
26. Hernández-Sierra JF, Ruiz F, Pena DC, Martínez- Gutiérrez F, Martínez AE, Guillén Ade J, Tapia-Pérez H, Castañón GM. The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans to nanoparticles of silver, zinc oxide, and gold. Nanomedic 2008;4:237-240.
27. Reddy KM, Feris K, Bell J, Wingett DG, Hanley C, Punnoose A. Selective toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. Appl Phys Lett 2007;90:213902.
28. 2 thin film under weak UV light illumination. Environ Sci Technol 2003;37:4785-4789.
29. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Amer Dent Assoc 2003;134: 1382-1390.
30. Türkün LS, Celik EU. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: A two-year clinical trial. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:399-405.
31. Imazato S, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y, McCabe JF, Russell RR. Incorporation of bacterial inhibitor into resin composite. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1437-1443.
32. Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Bahir R, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans. Biomater 2006;27:3995-4002.
33. Zhou G, Li Y, Xiao W, Zhang L, Zuo Y, Xue J, Jansen JA. Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activities of a novel nanohydroxyapatite/ zinc oxide complex. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008; 85:929-937.
34. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Povey M, York D. Investigation into the antibacterial behavior of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J Nanopart Res 2007;9:479-489. (Pubitemid 46742856)
35. Devulapalle KS, Mooser G. Subsite specificity of the active site of glucosyltransferases from Streptococcus sobrinus. J Biol Chem 1994;269:11967-11971. (Pubitemid 24196689)
36. Paunio IK. The effect of certain cations and anions on the alkaline phosphomonoesterase activities in human dental plaque. Acta Odontol Scand 1970;28:399-415.
37. Wunder D, Bowen W. Action of agents on glucosyltransferases from Streptococcus mutans in solution and adsorbed to experimental pellicle. Arch Oral Biol 1999;44:203-214. (Pubitemid 29144071)
38. He G, Pearce EI, Sissons CH. Inhibitory effect of ZnCl(2) on glycolysis in human oral microbes. Arch Oral Biol 2002;47:117-129.
39. Giertsen E, Scheie AA, Rölla G. Inhibition of plaque formation and plaque acidogenicity by zinc and chlorhexidine combinations. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:541-550. (Pubitemid 19004663)
40. Eisenberg AD, Young DA, Fan-Hsu J, Spitz LM. Interactions of sanguinarine and zinc on oral Streptococci and Actinomyces species. Caries Res 1991;25:185-190.
41. LeChevallier MW, Cawthon CD, Lee RG. Inactivation of biofilm bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988;54:2492-2499.
42. Conrady DG, Brescia CC, Horii K, Weiss AA, Hassett DJ, Herr AB. A zinc-dependent adhesion module is responsible for intercellular adhesion in staphylococcal biofilms. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:19456-19461.